The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanozoomer s60 slide scanner

Manufactured by Hamamatsu Photonics
Sourced in Japan, United States

The NanoZoomer S60 is a high-performance slide scanner designed for digitizing glass slides. It captures high-resolution images of specimens with a maximum scanning area of 60 x 90 mm. The device features a fixed optical system, allowing for consistent, reliable image quality.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

28 protocols using nanozoomer s60 slide scanner

1

Characterization of Murine Tuberculosis Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the mice infected with a CFU of 2000 or below were weighed and sacrificed on day 30 post-inoculation. We referred to a previous study and developed a clinical score method to calculate the severity of disease progression [26 (link)]. The mice were scored in terms of general behavior, feeding habits, and weight gain or loss. Animals reaching a clinical score of ≥4.0 were at the time point that followed by the time of death. The weight of each lung and spleen was measured, and organ coefficient was obtained by using the following formula: organ coefficient = organ weight (g)/mouse weight (g) [27 (link)]. Blood was obtained ante-mortem from eye route and serum was collected after clotting. The blood serum samples were stored at −80 °C until further experiment. The same lobe of the lung from each study group was fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections of ~5 μm thickness were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) for histological examination and for the detection of acid-fast bacilli, respectively [28 (link)]. The digital images of the whole slide were acquired by Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S60 slide scanner and its viewing platform (NDP Viewer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morphometric Analysis of Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Right lungs were inflated with 4% buffered formalin to 25 cm of fixative pressure. Non-inflated left lungs were immersion fixed. Lungs were paraffin embedded and sectioned at 5 µm and stained with H&E, Masson-Goldner-Trichrome and AB-PAS. Images were captured with a NanoZoomer S60 Slidescanner (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) at a magnification of 40×. Airway regions were determined from proximal-to-distal distances and airway branching, as determined by longitudinal sections of lung lobes at the level of the main axial airway, as previously described [55 (link)]. Degenerative cells were identified by morphologic criteria such as swollen cells with vacuolized cytoplasm and pycnotic nucleus in H&E stained lung sections. Numeric cell densities were determined using NDP.view2 software version 2.7.52 (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan), as previously described [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tissue Sectioning and H&E Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen tissues were embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound and cryo-sectioned at 25 μm on PEN-membrane slides and fixed in 70% ethanol for 5 min. Fixed tissue sections were rinsed twice with 1X PBS, stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and photo-recorded using a Nanozoomer S60 Slide scanner (Hamamatsu). Crypts of interest were marked using the NDP.View2 software (Hamamatsu) for subsequent laser-capture microdissection (LCM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Lung Cell Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung tissue was fixed with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5-μm thick sections, and adhered to charged slides. Sections were deparaffinized in Fisherbrand CitriSolv (Fisher Scientific), hydrated, and heat-treated with antigen unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories). Immunostaining was performed with MUC5AC mAb and anti-CLCA1 antibody as described above and rabbit anti-MUC5B antibody (Abcam ab87276). Primary antibodies were detected with secondary antibodies labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (ThermoFisher Scientific) or Alexa Fluor 555 (ThermoFisher Scientific) followed by DAPI counterstaining. Slides were imaged by immunofluorescent microscopy using an Olympus BX51, and staining was quantified using a NanoZoomer S60 slide scanner (Hamamatsu) and ImageJ software version 1.53v (NIH, Bethesda, MD; https://imagej.net/ij/index.html) as described previously (32 (link)–34 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Tissue Processing and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature compound, and frozen histological sections were cut at 30 µm, mounted on polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) slides and fixed in 70% ethanol for 5 min, followed by two washes with PBS for 1 min each. Slides were manually stained in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using a conventional staining protocol. A subset of samples (PD44594c–h and PD44589f) were fixed in PAXgene Tissue FIX (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fixed tissue samples were embedded in paraffin using a Tissue-Tek tissue-processing machine (Sakura). No formalin was used in the preparation, storage, fixation or processing of samples. Processed tissue blocks were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned to 10-µm thickness and mounted onto PEN slides (Leica). Tissue slides were stained using a standard H&E protocol. Slides were temporarily coverslipped and scanned on a NanoZoomer S60 Slide Scanner (Hamamatsu); images were viewed using NDP.View2 software (Hamamatsu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Interstitial Macrophage Cellularity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane fragments were fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution for embedding in paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were cut and stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) or prepared for BMP-2 immunostaining and CD68 CD206 immunofluorescence analysis. A pathological histologist examined all HES-stained sections. All immuno-stained sections on glass slides were digitized with a Nanozoomer S60 slide scanner (Hamamatsu) to quantify whole-slide images. Scanning resolution at 20× magnification was 0.46 µm/px. Virtual slide images were saved in 16-bit raw format for immunofluorescence analysis and RGB TIFF format for sections with standard staining. All image processing was performed with Fiji software [16 (link)]. To quantify IM cellularity, sections were stained with DAPI to visualize the cell nuclei. A region of interest (ROI) was drawn manually to exclude muscle fibers from the areas analyzed. The DAPI image was thresholded with the Triangle algorithm to select the brightest objects. Each object was then isolated to segment clusters of nuclei based on the local maxima of the initial image (with the segmented particles option). A “logical and” was used between the first threshold and the segmented particles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tissue Microarray Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarray (TMA) slides were generously provided by Prof. Zhang Zhigang (Shanghai Cancer Institute, China). After deparaffinization and hydration in Milli-Q water, antigens were retrieved by boiling TMA slides in citrate buffer for 20 min. Then, endogenous peroxidase activity and nonspecific binding activity were blocked before incubation with the primary antibody at the recommended dilution (4 °C, overnight) in a wet box. Finally, immunoreactivity was visualized using the Mouse and Rabbit specific HRP/DAB (ABC) Detection IHC Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich). Images were taken by a NanoZoomer S60 slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan) at a magnification of 20×. The expression levels of corresponding targets were determined by quantitative analysis. IHC scores were graded according to the percentage of stained cells as previously described 38 (link). Briefly, the scoring was assigned as follows: the percentage scores: 0, <5% of positively stained cells; 1, 5-50%; 2, 51-100%; the intensity scores: 0, absent or faint; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Oligocortical Spheroids: Hypoxia and Oligodendrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligocortical spheroids were treated every other day with DMSO or 300nM AZD8330 between days 70 and 74 and harvested on day 90. 2 hours prior to harvesting, spheroids were treated with 200uM Hypoxyprobe-1 (pimonidazole, Hypoxyprobe Inc, Burlington MA, HP1–100Kit). Spheroids were washed in PBS and fixed overnight in ice cold 4% Paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 15710) and then washed in PBS and cryoprotected in a 30% sucrose solution. Spheroids were frozen in OCT and sectioned at thickness of 15 μm. Slides were washed in PBS and incubated overnight with anti-MyRF (1:1000, gift from Michael Wegner) and anti-pimonidazole antibodies (1:250, Hypoxyprobe Inc, Burlington MA, HP1–100Kit) followed by labelling with appropriate Alexa-Fluor labeled secondary antibodies (2μg/mL, Thermo Fisher). Images were captured using a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer S60 Slide scanner with NDP 2.0 software. Images spanning the edge to the central region of each oligocortical spheroid were used for analysis. SOX10+ cells and MyRF+ oligodendrocytes in Hypoxyprobe positive and Hypoxyprobe negative areas within each image were quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tissue Preparation and Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound, frozen histological sections were cut at 25–30 µm and mounted on polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) slides and fixed in 70% ethanol for 5 minutes followed by two washes with phosphate buffered saline for 1 min each. Slides were manually stained in haematoxylin and eosin using a conventional staining protocol. A subset of samples were fixed in RNAlater (Sigma Aldrich) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Fixed tissue samples were embedded in paraffin using a Tissue-Tek tissue processing machine (Sakura). No formalin was used in the preparation, storage, fixation or processing of samples. Processed tissue blocks were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned to 10 µm thickness and mounted onto PEN slides (Leica). Tissue slides were stained using a standard haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) protocol. Slides were temporarily cover-slipped and scanned on a NanoZoomer S60 Slide Scanner (Hamamatsu), images were viewed with NDP.View2 software (Hamamatsu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Prostate Tissue Preparation and Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole prostates were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. All samples were sectioned at a thickness of 3 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All H&E-stained slides were scanned by a whole-slide imaging scanner (Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S60 Slide Scanner) with a ×20 objective lens and were stored on a secure computer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!