The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genomestudio 2011

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

GenomeStudio 2011.1 is a data analysis software for processing and analyzing data generated from Illumina's microarray and sequencing platforms. The software provides tools for visualization, normalization, and statistical analysis of genomic data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using genomestudio 2011

1

Transcriptomic Analysis of Illumina HumanHT-12 Microarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw, probe level summary values as exported from Illumina GenomeStudio 2011 of Illumina HumanHT-12 (v4.0) microarrays were imported into R using beadarray (35 (link)). Probes were background corrected followed by quantile normalization using the neqc command (36 (link)). The analysis was restricted to probes with a detection p < 0.05 in at least 10% of the samples and probes matching to GENCODE version 26 with at most 2 mismatches. A linear model was fitted using limma to determine differential expression including parameters for sample collection batch effects, as well as unobserved batch effects, by the inclusion of the first three surrogate variables as provided by the R package sva (37 (link), 38 (link)). Array quality weights were incorporated in order to account for between array quality differences (37 (link), 39 (link)). To account for between-patient correlation, the duplicateCorrelation command from the limma package was used. All p-values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (40 ). The transcriptomic dataset has been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and is accessible through accession number GSE122737.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping and Linkage Analysis of HM1 Family

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighteen samples from the HM1 family were genotyped using Illumina iScan system (Illumina, USA) and Illumina HumanCytoSNP-12 V.2.1 BeadChip kit. Genotypes were called and quality controlled using Illumina GenomeStudio 2011. Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium of HM1 family was tested by merlin V.1.1.226 (link) under multiple-parameter analysis with ‘High_myopia 0.001 0.001,0.9,0.99 rare_dominant’ settings. The ‘merlin’ or ‘minx’ prompt was used to analyse the autosomal or X linked linkage disequilibrium separately. Merlin V.1.1.2 drew the haplotype of HM1 and HM2 families with the ‘best’ option.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CNV Detection Using PennCNV HMM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CNVs were detected using the software PennCNV 1.04 [43 (link)]. In the software, a hidden Markov model (HMM) determined the CNVs with the total signal intensity Log R ratio (LRR) and B allele frequency (BAF) for each SNP marker. The LRR and BAF values can be downloaded from the Illumina Genomestudio2011. The population frequency of the B allele (PFB) was calculated using the BAF values collected from the discovery or replicate study. The GC file was obtained from UCSC genome bioinformatics (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/database/gc5Base.txt.gz). The final CNVs were obtained after excluding those that met these conditions: LRR SD (standard deviation) > 0.3, GC wave factor > 0.05, CNV number >100, CNV length < 10kb, consecutive SNPs < 10, and confidence <10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Diversity of Chinese Cattle Breeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were obtained from 188 individuals representing 8 different cattle breeds across a broad latitudinal range in China. These include Menggu cattle (MGC), Yanhuang cattle (YHC), Caidamu cattle (CDM), Pingwu cattle (PWC), Liangshan cattle (LSC), Zhaotong cattle (ZTC), Wenshan cattle (WSC), and Nandan cattle (NDC). Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using the TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd), and DNA with an A260/280 ratio ranging between 1.8 and 2.0 was subject to further analysis. In this study, we divided 8 breeds into 4 groups based on geographical locations (North group, Northwest group, Southwest group and South group) (Fig. 1). The genotyping platform adopted in this study was Illumina’s Infinium II Multi-Sample Assay. SNP chips were scanned using iScan and analyzed using Illumina’s GenomeStudio 2011. After filtering by the call rate of each given animal (threshold was > 95%), the final data including Log R Ratio (LRR) and B Allele Frequency (BAF) were exported from GenomeStudio software. To avoid the bias of population genetic estimation, genetic relationships between pairwise individuals were estimated using PI-HAT value implemented in PLINK v1.0782 (link), unrelated individuals with pairwise PI-HAT < 0.25 were kept for subsequent analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Differential Gene Expression Analysis of Tuberculosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw, probe level summary values as exported from Illumina GenomeStudio 2011 of Illumina HumanHT 12 V4 microarrays were imported into R using beadarray73 (link). Probes were background corrected followed by quantile normalization using the neqc command74 (link). The analysis was restricted to probes with a detection p-value of less than 0.01 in at least 10% of the samples and probes matching to GENCODE version 24 with at most 2 mismatches. A linear model was fitted using limma75 (link) to determine differential expression including parameters for gender, age, ethnicity and batch effects infection as well as the MGIT growth rate and array quality weights were incorporated76 (link) in order to account for between array quality differences. To account for between patient correlation, the duplicateCorrelation command from the limma package was used. All p-values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure77 . Gene set enrichment analysis was carried out using the tmod package in R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping of Atlantic Cod Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We sampled 316 Atlantic cod (Figure 1 and Table 1), consisting of 144 individuals from 5 locations from the Northwest Atlantic, 39 Frontal and 39 Coastal ecotype individuals from Iceland (classified by data storage tag (DST) profiles, see Pálsson and Thorsteinsson, 2003 ; Thorsteinsson et al., 2012 ), and 50 NEAC and 44 NCC individuals from the Northeast Atlantic.
DNA was extracted from muscle tissue using the E.Z.N.A Tissue DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) and normalized to 100 ng μl−1. All samples were individually genotyped using a 12K Illumina SNP chip for which 8165 SNPs were polymorphic in this data set, had a call rate of >95% and showed Mendelian inheritance in a separate set of individuals with a pedigree. Out of these SNPs, 602 were close to selected candidate genes, 1470 were nonsynonymous SNPs and the remaining 5857 SNPs were randomly distributed throughout the 23 different linkage groups (LGs). Genotype clustering was performed in Genome Studio 2011.1 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The nomenclature of the LGs follows Hubert et al. (2010) (link) and the order of the SNPs are as in Berg et al. (2016) (link). All 8165 SNPs used were mapped to the published Atlantic cod genome (ATLCOD1C) (Star et al., 2011 (link)) in the same way as in Berg et al. (2016) (link) and details are available in dbSNP (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Illumina Infinium Genotyping Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed by the Illumina Infinium assay using the Illumina HumanOmniExpress‐12v1_H BeadChip. The results on 730 525 SNPs were analyzed using the software GenomeStudio 2011.1 from Illumina Inc. The average sample call rate per SNP with sample call rate above zero was >99%, and the overall reproducibility was >99.99%. Arrays were processed according to manufacturers' protocol at the SNP&SEQ Technology Platform at Uppsala University and is available on request.25
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Methylation Profiling Using Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was bisulfite converted using Zymo EZ-96 DNA Methylation Kit per the manufacturer’s protocol. CpG methylation status of 485,577 CpG sites was determined using Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip per manufacturer’s protocol and as previously described (Gibbs et al., 2010). Initial data analysis was performed using GenomeStudio 2011.1 (Model M Version 1.9.0 Illumina, Inc. CA)). Threshold call rate for inclusion of samples was 95%. Quality control of sample handling included comparison of clinically reported sex versus sex of the same samples determined by analysis of methylation levels of CpG sites on the X chromosome. Beta values were extracted for sites on the X chromosome. Subject mean methylation versus subject mean intensity levels were plotted in R V2.11.1. Based on methylation levels for chromosome X loci, these data split into two primary groups. Calls generated by this method were then compared with sample information reported by InCHIANTI. Samples not matching between clinical reported sex and methylation data were excluded from analyses. 5 samples were excluded on the basis of sex-mismatch, 8 samples were omitted on the basis of other QC criteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping Using Illumina Golden Gate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed using the Illumina Golden Gate assay at the SNP&SEQ Technology Platform at Uppsala University, Sweden. A panel of 768 SNPs were genotyped following the service provider’s protocol. The SNPs assayed were chosen from a panel developed by Haseneyer et al. [36 (link)] (Additional file 2). Due to lack of mapping information at the time, SNPs were selected to represent different biological roles, as described in their annotation. Later obtained mapping information [38 ] for ~100 of the SNPs showed an even distribution among chromosomes. SNPs not fulfilling Illumina Golden Gate design recommendations were avoided. Results were analyzed using the software GenomeStudio 2011.1 (Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping and eQTL Analysis of ZEB2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA genotyping was performed using the Illumina Infinium assay with the human OmniExpressExome-8v1 bead chip. Data was analyzed using GenomeStudio 2011.1 (Illumina) which produced 951,117 genomic markers (genome build 37) (8 (link)). Quality control was performed using PLINK v.1.07 and IMPUTE2 v.2.3.0 was used for genotype imputation to increase the power of analysis (13 (link)). Of the four SNPs in the vicinity of ZEB2 studied here in detail (Figure 1), three of the four being rs2252641, rs1830321 and rs6740731, were directly genotyped by the human OmniExpressExome-8v1 bead chip. Genotyping for rs17678683 was obtained by imputation. Genotyping for all four SNPs passed quality control. In each tissue, cis and trans- regulated expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) were identified with the R package Matrix eQTL v.2.1.1 (8 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!