The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using 5 chloro 2 deoxyuridine

1

DNA Fiber Assay for Replication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA fiber assay was performed as described (15 (link), 56 (link)). Cells were labeled with 50 μM 5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (IdU; Sigma-Aldrich, I7125) for 30 min before washing. Cells were then treated with or without HU (Sigma-Aldrich, H8627) for 4 hours. Following wash, cells were labeled with 50 μM 5-chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (CIdU; Sigma-Aldrich, C6891) for 30, 60, and 90 min, respectively. Cells were collected and suspended at a concentration of 103/μl, and 2.5 μl of cell suspension was used to prepare for the DNA fibers. Immunofluorescent staining was performed using IdU and CIdU antibodies. DNA fibers were analyzed using Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope. The lengths (1 μm = 2.59 kb) of DNA fibers were measured with the ImageJ software. At least 200 DNA fibers were examined for each sample, and each experiment was independently repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying DNA Replication Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fiber analysis was performed as described (14 (link), 26 (link)). 5-Iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (IdU; 50 μM; Sigma-Aldrich, I7125) was used to label the cells for 30 min, with or without HU (Selleck, S1896) treatment, and then 250 μM 5-chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (CldU; Sigma-Aldrich, C6891) was used for the second labeling. After labeling, ~3000 cells in 2.5 μl of suspension were dropped onto one end of the glass slide, mixed with 7.5 μl of lysis buffer [50 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, and 200 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.5)], and incubated for 8 min at room temperature. Then, the slides were tilted to 15° to spread the DNA fibers along the slide. The slides were then treated with 2.5 M hydrochloric acid, incubated with rat anti-BrdU/CIdU (BU1/75) monoclonal antibody (Novus, NB500-169), and mouse anti-IdU monoclonal antibody (BD, 347580). The secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor Cy3–conjugated goat anti-rat and Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-mouse, respectively. Images were captured using a confocal microscope (Olympus, FV1000). ImageJ software was used to measure the length of DNA fibers, and the formula that 1 μm = 2.59 kb was used to convert the micrometer value to kilobase. New replication origin firing analysis was performed as described (54 ). Cells were labeled with CIdU for 10 min (without HU) or with 100 μM HU for 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pharmacological Inhibitors for Cancer Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following chemicals or inhibitors were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA); A-485 (Cat# S8740), Enzalutamide (Cat# S1250) and Olaparib (Cat# S1060). Etoposide (Cat# E1383), Mitomycin C (Cat# M4287), 5-Chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (Cat# C6891, 5-Iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (Cat# I7125), Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Cat# D8418) and 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (Cat# D9542) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). BRD9 inhibitor (Cat# T6859), SWI/SNF inhibitor, AU-15330 (T39954) and bromodomain inhibitor GNE-049 were purchased from TargetMol (Wellesley Hills, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying DNA Replication Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze origin density, cells were pulsed labeled with 25 μM 5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (Sigma-Aldrich) and with 25 μM 5-chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (Sigma-Aldrich). The DNA was stretched on glass slides and the incorporated nucleotides were detected by IdU antibody (mouse anti-bromodeoxyuridine, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems) and CldU antibody (monoclonal rat anti-bromodeoxyuridine [anti-BrdU], Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corporation) as described above. We used Student’s t test with two-tailed distribution for P value calculation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA Replication Dynamics under Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each LCL sample, ∼100 000 cells were labelled with thymidine analogues, 20 µM 5-chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (CldU, Sigma-Aldrich, C6891) for 30 min followed by 200 µM 5-Iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (IdU, Sigma-Aldrich, I7125) for 30 min and subsequently washed thrice with PBS. Labelled cells were mixed with lysis buffer in 1:1 ratio before mounted on SuperFrost Plus slides (Epredia, J1800AMNZ). Cellular DNA were spread by slanting the slides and fixed in 3:1 methanol/acetic acid for 30 min, followed by denaturation with 2.5 N hydrochloric acid for 40 min and subsequently blocked with 2% BSA in PBS-0.1% Tween20 for 40 min at RT. Slides were washed five times with PBS followed by 2 h incubation with 1:200 anti-BrdU/IdU (Becton Dickinson, 347580, mouse) and 1:200 anti-BrdU/CldU (Abcam, ab6326, rat) antibodies. Subsequently, slides were washed five times with PBS and finally stained with anti-mouse AlexaFluor-488 (Abcam, 150157) and anti-rat AlexaFluor-594 (Abcam, 150116) conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT.
Labelled DNA fibres were imaged with 63× objective (0.103 um/pixel) using a Zeiss Inverted Fluorescence Live Cell Microscope AO7. The experiments were performed in the presence of replication stress inducing agents, such as HydroxyUrea (HU, Sigma-Aldrich, H8627) and PARP inhibitor (PARPi) (Talazoparib BMN-673, MedChem Express), as controls to assess the differences in RF speed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Fiber Assay: Replication Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fiber assay was conducted as described previously (Castillo et al. 2014). Briefly, cells pretreated with JA2131 (10 µM) or DMSO for 2 h were labeled with 100 µM CldU for 30 min and exposed to 250 µM IdU (with or without 0.4 mM hydroxyurea treatment) for another 30 min or 3 h. After labeling and treatment, cells were lysed and DNA fibers stretched onto glass slides. Immunofluorescence was carried out using α-IdU/α-BrdU (BD Biosciences) and α-CldU/α-BrdU (Abcam) and secondary antibodies, including Alexa Fluor 488 (green) and Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen). Images were taken using a Nikon 80 microscope and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistics were calculated using Prism software. 5-Chloro-2’-deoxyuridine (CIdU) and 5-Iodo-2’-deoxyuridine (IdU) were from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Fiber Labeling and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydroxyurea (Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 2 mM; MIRIN, the inhibitor of MRE11 exonuclease activity (Calbiochem), was used at 45 μM. Cells were accumulated in mitosis upon Nocodazole (Sigma-Aldrich) treatment for 24 hours at 0.5 μg/μl. To label parental ssDNA, 5′-Iodo-2′deoxyuridine (IdU- Sigma-Aldrich) was used for 20 hours at 100 μM. To label DNA fibers: 5′-Chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (CldU- Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 50 μM, IdU was used at 250 μM for 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Fiber Assay for Replication Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For DNA fiber assay, A549 cells were transiently transfected with SCAT7 targeting GapmeR along with negative control as previously described. Forty-eight hours post transfection, cells were subjected to two consecutives 30 min pulses with 0.1 mM 5-Chloro-2'-Deoxyuridine (CldU) and 0.1 mM 5-Iodo-2'-Deoxyuridine (IdU) (Sigma Aldrich) followed by three cold PBS washes. Cells were harvested and counted. 50 × 105 cells/sample were used for gel plugs preparation using the FiberPrep DNA extraction kit (Genomic Vision, Begneux, France) and Gel plug molds (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. DNA samples in agarose plugs were sent to Genomic Vision facility (Bagneux, France) for DNA stretching into coverslips and data acquisition on the FiberVision platform (Genomic Vision). We performed DNA fiber analysis using the software FiberStudio version 0.9.12 (Genomic Vision).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Replication Stress in MEFs Assessed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEFs were pulse labeled with 25 μM 5-chloro-2’-deoxyuridine (cat #C6891, Sigma-Aldrich,) and 250 μM 5-iodo 2’-deoxyuridine (cat #I7125-5G, Sigma-Aldrich) successively for the indicated times, with or without additional replication stress using 8 μM Mitomycin-C (MMC, cat #M0503, Sigma Aldrich). DNA fiber spreading, immunostraning and quantification is described in Supplementary Material and Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dual Replication Labeling Technique

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were labeled with CldU (5-chloro-2-deoxyuridine, Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min, washed twice with pre-warmed PBS before labeling cells with IdU (5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine, Sigma-Aldrich) in ten times higher concentration for another 20 min. During the IdU pulse, cells were either treated with MMC (3 μM) or H2O as control. For TRC-experiments cells were pre-treated with DRB (20 μM) or its solvent DMSO 60 min prior to start of CldU-labeling and throughout the whole CldU- as well as IdU-labeling. Subsequently, cells were washed, harvested and resuspended in PBS. 2500 cells were transferred to a slide, lysed with 6 μl of 0.5% SDS, 200 mM Tris–HCl, pH7.4, 50 mM EDTA, and incubated at room temperature for 6 min. Slides were tilted about 20° to allow DNA to spread via gravity, covered with aluminum foil, air-dried for 7 min, fixed for 5 min with 3:1 methanol:acetic acid (prepared fresh), air dried for 7 min, and stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight or directly afterwards processed for denaturation/deproteination in 2.5 N HCl for 1 h, followed by Immunofluorescence staining
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!