The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using biotinylated goat anti mouse antibody

1

Parvalbumin Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free floating sections were quenched in 0.3% H2O2 for 25 min, then blocked in 5% goat serum 90 min. They were then incubated with primary antibody mouse anti-parvalbumin (Sigma Aldrich) for 2 days followed by a biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma Aldrich) for 90 min. Following this, solutions A and B from the standard Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) 1:500 for 1 h. Staining was developed using a DAB (3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride hydrate; Sigma Aldrich) solution. The sections were then mounted onto slides. After air drying, slides were dehydrated in increasing concentration of alcohol, cleared with Hemo-De and coverslipped with Fisher Chemical Permount Mounting Medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HER-2 in Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty formalin-fixed paraffin embedded gastric cancer tissue samples that were used for the above macromolecule analysis were also used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). Two micrometer sections were cut the day before use and stained according to standard protocols. Two strategies were used to maximize the IHC signal: antigen retrieval in citrate buffer, and signal amplification with biotinylated tyramide, as described previously (Yoon et al., 2011b (link)). The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with HER-2 antibody (1/100; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Detection was carried out using biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma), followed by incubation with a peroxidase-linked avidin–biotin complex. Diaminobenzidine was used as the chromogen, and the slides were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. Two experienced pathologists assessed HER-2 immunostaining using the HercepTest (Dako, Carpentaria, CA, USA). Modified HER-2 scoring criteria for gastric cancer were used; 0, no staining or <10% tumor cells with membrane staining; 1+, >10% tumor cells with faint staining in partial membrane; 2+, >10% tumor cells with weak to moderate staining in partial membrane; 3+, >10% tumor cells with strong staining in partial membrane (Hofmann et al., 2008 (link)). Themanufacturer provided the positive and the negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining of Parvalbumin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free floating sections were quenched in 0.3% H2O2 for 25 min, then blocked in 5% goat serum 90 min. They were then incubated with primary antibody mouse anti-parvalbumin (Sigma Aldrich) for 2 days followed by a biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma Aldrich) for 90 min. Following this, solutions A and B from the standard Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) 1:500 for 1 h. Staining was developed using a DAB (3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride hydrate; Sigma Aldrich) solution. The sections were then mounted onto slides. After air drying, slides were dehydrated in increasing concentration of alcohol, cleared with Hemo-De and coverslipped with Fisher Chemical Permount™ Mounting Medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Tissue Parasitism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue parasitism was evaluated in the organs by immunohistochemistry as previously described [28 (link)]. Deparaffinized sections were incubated at room temperature with phosphate buffered saline plus 3% non-fat milk (Nestlé, São Paulo, Brazil) to reduce nonspecific binding, and then incubated at 4 °C overnight with polyclonal anti-T. gondii serum obtained from Swiss mice infected with ME-49 strain diluted in 0.01% saponin. After incubation with biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), the assay sensitivity was improved by avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (ABC kit, PK-4000; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). The reaction was developed with 0.03% H2O2 plus 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; Sigma) for 5 min. The sections were counterstained with Harris haematoxylin and examined under light microscope using a 40× objective. The tissue parasitism was scored by counting the number of cyst-like structures and parasitophorous vacuoles from two hundred microscopic fields in the small intestine, and in 40 microscopic fields in the lung or liver tissue section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Parvalbumin Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were quenched in 0.3% H2O2 in PBS for 25 minutes, then blocked in 5% goat serum in 0.5% Triton-X TBS for 90min. Primary antibody (mouse anti-parvalbumin; Sigma Aldrich) 1:2000 was added for 2 days, followed by a biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma Aldrich) 1:500 for 90min both in TBS with 0.5% Triton-X. Following this, A and B form the standard Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) 1:500 in PBS was added for 1h. Staining was developed using a DAB (3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride hydrate; Sigma Aldrich) solution containing 0.05% DAB and 0.015% H2O2 in TBS. Sections were rinsed in PBS and mounted onto slides. After air drying, slides were dehydrated in increasing concentration of alcohol, cleared with Hemo-De and coverslip with Fisher Chemical Permount™ Mounting Medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Parvalbumin Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were quenched in 0.3% H2O2 in PBS for 25 minutes, then blocked in 5% goat serum in 0.5% Triton-X TBS for 90 min. Primary antibody mouse anti-parvalbumin antibody (Sigma Aldrich) 1:2000 was added for 2 days followed by a biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma Aldrich) 1:500 for 90 min both in TBS with 0.5% Triton-X. Following this, A and B from the standard Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) 1:500 in PBS was added for 1 h. Staining was developed using a DAB (3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride hydrate; Sigma Aldrich) solution containing 0.05% DAB and 0.015% H2O2 in TBS. Sections were rinsed in PBS and mounted onto slides. After air drying, slides were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of alcohol, cleared with Hemo-De and coverslipped with Fisher Chemical Permount™ Mounting Medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lateral Flow Immunoassay with Wax Valves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A model LFIA of 4 test spots, two each at 10 mm and 15 mm upstream of the valve (ESI Scheme S1C), was fabricated to model a four-segment LFIA with test spots for three different analytes of interest and a control spot. These LFIAs were tested with straight, concave, and convex valves, all of with an area of 5 mm2, and a control without a wax valve. Biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was prepared as previously described42 (link)and deposited at the test zones with a sciFLEXARRAYER S3 (Scienion). Forty (40) μL of streptavidin-coated 150 nm gold nanoshells (nanoComposix) diluted 1:1 in 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in 1XPBST was added to the sample pad. The valves were actuated by placing the strips on a 70°C heat block. After 10 minutes, the strips were removed from the heat and after 30 minutes, they were scanned on an Epson Perfection V550 scanner. The valves were heated for 10 minutes here to allow the wax to stay in a liquid for long enough that the large 150 nm gold nanoshells can travel through the valves. The strips are left for 30 minutes before scanning because this allows sufficient time for the gold nanoshells to travel down the length of the membrane and form signal. The resulting signal-to-background ratio of the visible signal at the antibody test spots was analyzed using MATLAB (Mathworks).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!