The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using indesign cs6

1

Photoshop and InDesign Image Editing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital images were adjusted for brightness and contrast with Adobe® Photoshop® CS6 and compiled with Adobe® InDesign® CS6 on a MacBook Pro.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Taxonomic Study of Haplocookia mauritanica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material of the new species was collected by NA, stored in 70% ethanol, and deposited in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum – University of Copenhagen (ZMUC), and Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NHMW). Type material of Haplocookiamauritanica (MNHN) was examined for comparison. General characters were studied with a Wild Heerbrug 308700 stereomicroscope from Zeiss. Measurements and drawings were obtained using a camera lucida of a compound microscope Axioskop from Zeiss. Parts of some specimens were mounted on microscope preparations in lactic acid for examination. Micrographs were made in NHMW with a Nikon DS-F2.5 camera mounted on a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope, using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software with an Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) patch. All images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 and assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed Protocols for Specimen Collection and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens were collected by hand and preserved in 70% or 96% ethanol. The holotype was photographed in situ using a Canon 400D camera with a 65 mm macro objective. Microphotographs were obtained with a Nikon DS-F2.5 camera mounted on a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software with an Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) patch. For scanning electron microscopy, parts of some specimens were cleaned with ultrasound, transferred to 96% ethanol then to acetone, air-dried, mounted on aluminum stubs, coated with Platinum/Palladium and studied in a JEOL JSM-6335F scanning electron microscope. All images were edited in Adobe Photoshop CS6 and assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6. Type material is shared between the Croatian Biospeleological Society – Croatian Natural History Museum (CBSS), The Natural History Museum Denmark – University of Copenhagen (ZMUC), Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NHMW), and the National Museum of Natural History, Sofia (NMNHS).
Morphological terminology follows Bonato et al. (2010) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Brightfield Microscopy Image Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bright field images were taken with a SPOT Insight Fire Wire camera mounted on a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope. All images were processed using Adobe InDesign CS6 and minor adjustments for clarity were made using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging and Processing Embryo Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope with a SPOT Insight Fire Wire camera. Live embryos were mounted in methylcellulose on glass depression slides. Fixed embryos were mounted in 100% glycerol on glass coverslips. Images were processed using Adobe InDesign CS6 and image clarity adjustments were made using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed Photographic Catalog of Millipede Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material was obtained from different museums (see list of repositories), studied and photographed using a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera mounted on a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope, using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software with an Extended Depth of Focus (EDF). Obtained images were edited in Adobe Photoshop CS6 and assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6. The map is performed used QGIS 3.28.9 (Firenze) with Open Topography-DEM-Downloader 2.0 plugin and WGS 84.
Acronyms of the repositories:
IZCASNational Zoological Museum of China, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
NMNHSNational Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
ZMUM Zoological Museum of Moscow University, Moscow, Russia.
List of abbreviations:
a lobe-like mesal process of coxa
b (sub-)falcate mesal process of coxa
c coxa
Ca Coxal anterior lobe
Cl Coxal lateral lobe
dl distal lamella of telopodite
dp distal process of telopodite
k lateral process of the distal part of telopodite
M mesal process of the distal part of telopodite
n notch on the distal part of the telopodite
p lateral process of the proximal part of telopodite
pf1 prefemoroidal process 1
pf2 prefemoroidal process 2
pr prefemur
ps parasolenomere
PT pleurotergites
s solenomere
T telopodite
tb blunt tooth of telopodite
Tp telopodital projection
tr trochanter
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Efficient Illustration and Layout Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Schematics, tables, and vector graphics were created using Adobe Illustrator CS6, and figures are arranged and compiled using Adobe InDesign CS6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscopic Examination of Arthropod Mouthparts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mandibles and/or first maxillae were detached from the head with forceps and dissecting needles in one to seven adult male or female individuals per species (see Table 1; Supporting Information 1). Manual multifocus images of the sclerotized parts of the mandibles and first maxillae were obtained with a Nikon Eclipse Ni compound microscope (LM) equipped with a Nikon DS‐Ri2 camera using NIS‐Elements Microscopic Imaging Software. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the specimens were: (a) cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (50–60 Hz) for 5 to 10 s (maximum); (b) dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 96% EtOH, 2 × 10 min each); (c) covered with HMDS (hexamethyldisilazane) and air dried overnight. The mouthparts were mounted on sticky aluminium tape fixed on aluminium stubs, glued with conductive silver and coated with platinum (Leica EM SCD500). Then, they were studied and photographed with a JEOL JSM 6610‐LV at an accelerating voltage of 10–15 kV. LM and some SEM images were stacked and processed using Zerene Stacker (version 1.04) and Adobe Photoshop CS6. Figures were assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6.
Terminology follows Bonato et al. (2010), Edgecombe et al. (2002), and Edgecombe et al. (2003) where applicable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Epipharynx and Hypopharynx Dissection Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The epipharynx and hypopharynx were dissected from the preoral chamber as described in Koch and Edgecombe (2008) (link) in one to four adult male or female individuals per species. Multifocus images of the sclerotized parts of the epipharynx and hypopharynx were obtained with a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DS-F2.5 camera using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software with an PageBreakExtended Depth of Focus (EDF) patch. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the specimens were: (1) cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (50–60 Hz) for 5 to 10 seconds (maximum), occasionally in a solution of 15% hydrogen peroxide for 2 hours; (2) dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 96% EtOH, 2 × 10-15 min each); (3) air dried overnight (or covered with HMDS) or critical point dried (Leica 300 CPD). Specimens were mounted on aluminium stubs equipped with a sticky aluminium tape, glued with conductive silver, coated with platinum (Leica EM SCD500) and studied with a JEOL JSM 6610-LV at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Figures were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 and assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6.
Terminology follows Koch and Edgecombe (2008) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Stereomicroscope Imaging of Insect Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens were collected by hand or obtained by sifting in October 2017 and kept in 96% ethanol in the collections of the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien. Multifocus images were obtained with a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DS-F2.5 camera using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software with an Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) patch. Some images were edited in Photoshop CS6 and figures assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6. The map was produced in QGIS 2.18.19, using the coordinate reference system WGS84 and topographic data obtained from USGS (2006) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 3 Arc Second scene SRTM_f03_p208r040, Filled Finished-A 2.0, Global Landcover Facility, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, February 2000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!