The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ta q200

Manufactured by TA Instruments
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The TA Q200 is a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) designed for thermal analysis of materials. It measures the heat flow and temperature associated with material transitions and reactions as a function of temperature and time. The Q200 provides precise control of temperature and heating/cooling rates to analyze the thermal behavior of a wide range of materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using ta q200

1

Characterization of Amorphous Polymer Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular weights of E3 and E15 were estimated from viscosity measurements. The amorphous nature of the films were verified by XRD. SEM and AFM were performed to analyze the surfaces. DMA was performed to determine the Tg. Tensile stress-strain curve tests, fracture toughness through peel tests, and lap shear tests were carried out. Nanoindentation was carried out to measure the hardness. The specific heat capacity was measured using DSC.
X-ray diffraction was conducted using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO Theta/Theta powder X-ray diffraction system with a Cu tube and an X’Celerator high-speed detector. AFM images were obtained using a Dimension 3100 XY closed loop scanner (Nanoscope IV, VEECO) equipped with NanoMan software. Height and phase images were obtained in tapping mode in ambient air with silicon tips (VEECO). DMA was carried out on a TA Q800 instrument. Mechanical testing was performed on an Instron mechanical tester. Nanoindentation tests were carried out on a Triboindenter Hysitron instrument. Calorimetry was performed on a TA Q200 instrument. The viscosity was measured on an HR-3 Hybrid rheometer54 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thermal Properties of Starch-Gluten Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal properties of potato starch, wheat gluten, and starch–gluten composite systems were investigated using a differential scanning calorimeter (TA Q200, TA Instruments, New Castle, USA). Samples (3 mg) were weighed into stainless steel pans, and 10 μl of distilled water was added before the pans were hermetically sealed. The pans were equilibrated at 4°C for 12 hr before heating from 25 to 100°C at a rate of 5°C/min by DSC. The onset temperature (T0), peak temperature (Tp), peak width at half height (ΔT), and endothermic enthalpy (ΔH) were calculated automatically. A sealed empty pan was used as reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thermal Properties of Polymer Blends

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal properties of the blends are determined
on a DSC instrument (TA Q200, USA) under a N2 atmosphere.
The samples are heated to 180 °C at 10 °C/min and maintained
for 3 min before cooling to −70 °C at 10 °C/min.
The second heating scans are monitored between −70 to 180 °C
at 10 °C/min for determining the glass-transition temperature
(Tg), cold crystallization temperature
(Tcc), melting temperature (Tm), and crystallinity (Xc).
Such studies are targeted to investigating the influence of peroxide
on the crystallization behavior of the blends.
The crystallinity
of PBS (XPBS) is calculated based on the
melting enthalpy of PBS (ΔHPBS)
occurring at ∼112 °C and the weight ratio of PBS (WPBS), as illustrated in eq 1. where ΔHm is the melting enthalpy of PBS, ΔHm° is the melting enthalpy assuming
100% crystalline
PBS (220 J/g here),42 (link) and wf is the weight fraction of PBS in the blend.
The
crystallinity of PLA (XPLA) is
calculated based on the melting enthalpy (ΔHPLA), the cold crystallization enthalpy of PLA (ΔHcPLA), and the weight ratio of PLA (WPLA), as illustrated in eq 2. where the ΔHm and ΔHc are the melting enthalpies and cold crystallization
enthalpies of PLA, ΔHm° is the melting enthalpy assuming
100% crystalline PLA (93.7 J/g here),43 (link) and wf is the weight fraction
of PLA in the blend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Thermal Properties of Oleofoams and Oleogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal properties of oleofoams and oleogels were assessed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (TA Q200 instrument, New Castle, UK). Around 20 mg of the sample were placed into a hermetically sealed aluminium pan for testing. An empty aluminium pan was used as a reference. DSC runs were carried out from 10 °C to 80 °C. The samples were scanned at a constant rate of 2 °C.min−1 applying a heating-cooling cycle (two heating steps, with one cooling step in between). An isotherm of 10 min was applied at 80 °C before cooling, and at 10 °C before heating. The transition temperatures, enthalpies of melting and crystallization were determined from the DSC curves using TA Instruments’ Universal Analysis Software, in triplicate for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thermal and Mechanical Characterization of Fabricated Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal response of all fabricated systems was examined via Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) via the TA Q200 and TA Q500 devices, both provided by TA Instruments. DSC thermographs were assessed in the range from 20 to 100 °C with a ramp of 5 °C/min. TGA tests were conducted from ambient temperature to 600 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Static mechanical tests were performed with an Instron 5582 Universal Testing Machine in tension, at room temperature with a 5 mm/min rate. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) experiments were conducted via a TA Q800 device (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA), in the temperature range from ambient to 100 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C/min at 1 Hz dynamic excitation. The employed type of test was three-point bending.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thermal Analysis of Polymer Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TA Instruments
Q500 was employed as a thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA) to study
the thermal degradation of synthesized polymers. Samples (5–10
mg) were placed in platinum pans and heated to 450 °C at 10 °C/min.
The temperature corresponding to 3% mass loss was considered as the
thermal degradation temperature and used as a guide for the maximum
temperature that could be employed in further thermal processing and
analysis steps. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) TA Q200
was then used to measure transition glass transition temperatures
(Tg) and melting temperatures (Tm) of the polymers. Samples (3–5 mg, n = 3) were placed in t-zero aluminum pans
and equilibrated at −40 °C, heated to 150 °C at 10
°C/min kept isothermally for 2 min, cooled to 50 °C at 5
°C/min, kept isothermally for 20 min, cooled to −40 °C,
kept isothermally for 2 min, and finally reheated to 150 °C at
10 °C/min. The midpoint of the first endothermic inflection above
0 °C and the minimum of the melting peak in the second heating
cycle were recorded as the Tg and Tm of the hard segment, respectively.35 (link),36 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Freezing Point Analysis of Porous Liquids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A TA Q200 differential scanning
calorimeter (DSC) was used to determine the freezing points of the
porous liquids, dispersions, and their counterparts. The samples were
rapidly frozen at −70 °C, then heated at 10 °C/min
until −10 °C, and finally heated at 0.5 °C/min to
20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing Drug-Polymer Interactions in PSIs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the physical state of DTG and PLGA in PSIs, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses of pure drug (DTG), optimized placebo PSIs, and optimized DTG PSIs were carried out using a differential scanning calorimeter (TA Q200, USA). Prior to DSC analysis, decomposition temperature (Td) of DTG was determined using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, TA Q500, USA). Briefly, pure DTG was weighed (10 mg), sealed in an aluminum pan, and placed into a thermogravimetric analyzer. The DTG sample was heated from 0 to 600 °C at a ramp-up rate of 10 °C/min under inert nitrogen gas introduced at a flow rate of 20 mL/min.
For DSC analysis, samples (3–5 mg DTG, 5–10 mg DTG or placebo PSIs) were weighed, hermetically sealed in an aluminum pan and subsequently placed in a differential scanning calorimeter. For each measurement, samples were heated from 0 to 250 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen (20 mL/min flow rate). The DSC thermograms were used to determine the peak glass transition temperature (Tg) of PLGA, melting point (Tm) of DTG, and the physical state of DTG in PSIs (i.e. crystalline or amorphous).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Thermal Analysis of Dry Nanosheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DSC measurement of dry nanosheets was performed on a TA Q200 differential scanning calorimeter. The nanosheet solutions were added to a preweighed aluminum T Zero pan and dried under vacuum. This process was repeated several times until about 2 mg of dry nanosheets was collected. The DSC pan was sealed with an aluminum T Zero lid and heated from 0 °C to 180 °C at 10 °C/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Differential Scanning Calorimetry for Nucleating Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out with a TA Q200 (TA Instruments, New Castle, UK) equipped with a RSC90 cooling system. The instrument was calibrated with indium as standard, using aluminium hermetic pans and nitrogen as purge gas set at a rate of 50 mL/min. Thanks to the preliminary thermal investigation, the best concentrations of the various different nucleating agents were selected for further mechanical characterizations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!