The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Compensation beads

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Compensation beads are a type of laboratory equipment used to calibrate and adjust the settings of flow cytometers. They are designed to provide a consistent and reliable reference point for the instrument, allowing users to ensure accurate and reproducible data. Compensation beads are typically composed of fluorescent particles that emit specific wavelengths, which can be detected by the flow cytometer. By using these beads, researchers can optimize the instrument's settings and compensate for any spectral overlap between different fluorescent markers, ensuring accurate fluorescence detection and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using compensation beads

1

Kidney Cell Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kidney cell suspensions were evaluated for epithelial cells, endothelial cells, leukocytes, and red blood cells by flow cytometry, as described (Lombardo et al., 2021 (link)). Briefly, cells were stained concurrently with 5 μg/ml anti-mouse CD45-AF488 (clone 30-F11), 7 μg/ml EpCAM-PE (clone G8.8), and 5 μg/ml TER119-AF647 (clone TER-119) monoclonal antibodies (all from BioLegend, San Diego, CA) for 30 min. Samples were then washed twice using PBS + by centrifugation, stained with 3.33 μg/ml of viability dye 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) on ice for at least 10 min, and analyzed on a Novocyte 3000 Flow Cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Flow cytometry data was compensated using compensation beads (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). Gates encompassing the positive and negative subpopulations within each compensation sample were inputted into FlowJo (FlowJo, Ashland, OR) to automatically calculate the compensation matrix. A sequential gating scheme was used to identify live and dead single epithelial cells from leukocytes, red blood cells, non-cellular debris, and cellular aggregates. Signal positivity was determined using appropriate Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) controls. All cell counts were normalized to the mass of tissue that was dissociated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry Compensation Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were analysed using a LSR Fortessa™ X-20 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), with 3-laser configuration (Blue, Violet, Yellow-Green). To ensure accurate fluorescence compensation for each panel, a FACS tube was prepared for each antibody by adding 100 μl PBS, 1 drop of compensation beads (Invitrogen™, #01–2222-41), and 1 μl of the specific antibody. Successful compensation was achieved when there was no overlap between fluorochromes, also considering signals obtained for non-stained cells and cells stained for viability only. Data from each sample were finally acquired and recorded until reaching the desired number of events. Cell populations were manually gated using the FlowJo software V10.8.0 (BD Biosciences), which was also used to globally visualize data via 2-dimensional t-SNE analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Protocol for Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collagenase-digested cell suspensions were evenly divided into FACS tubes and resuspended in FACS Buffer (1× PBS, without Ca and Mg) supplemented with 1% BSA (PBS+). Cell suspensions were stained simultaneously in 100 μL total volume with 5 μL (1 test) of each monoclonal mouse anti-human antibodies shown in Table 1 (all from BioLegend, San Diego, CA). After 20 minutes at 4°C, samples were washed with FACS Buffer by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS+ supplemented with 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) for dead cell exclusion, and maintained on ice for at least 15 minutes prior to analysis on a Novocyte 3000 Flow Cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Compensation was determined using single antibody-stained samples and compensation beads (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). Heat treatment (55°C for 15 min) was used as a dead cell control for 7-AAD. Gates were inputted into FlowJo software (Ashland, OR) to automatically calculate the compensation matrix. Signal positivity was determined using appropriate Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) controls. A sequential gating scheme (Figure, Supplemental Digital Content 1) was used to identify cell populations of interest from non-cellular debris and cellular aggregates. The cell populations of interest are listed and described in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements were made on a Sony SH800 (RRID: SCR_018066), BD FACSCanto (RRID: SCR_018055), BD LSR II (RRID: SCR_002159), or BD FACSAria II (RRID: SCR_018934). Single-stained cells or compensation beads (Invitrogen, 01–3333–41) were used as compensation controls. Antibodies and filter sets for each instrument are listed in Supplementary Materials and Methods. All data were analyzed using FlowJo v10.4.1 (RRID: SCR_008520).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Viral Infection in Co-Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ECs and HUVECs were plated on 6 well plates. Six h later, stably mCherry-expressing U251T3 cells (U251T3-mCherry) were collected and infected with 0.1 MOI rHSVQ or OVesRAGE virus for 30 min in a suspension condition. Cells were washed and overlaid on top of an equivalent number of ECs and cultured for 24 h. Cells were then collected and stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA) and analyzed in CytoFlex (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Single-stain controls for each fluorochrome were prepared using cells or compensation beads (Invitrogen, cat #01-222-42, Waltham, MA, USA) for compensation. Tumor and ECs were initially separated by gating for the mCherry-positive population (550–650 nm emission) and then further gated for GFP expression and live/dead cell staining-positive population. GFP expression represents virus-infected cells, while live/dead staining represents dead cell population. Data were analyzed using FlowJo v.10.7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Immunophenotyping of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached and washed once with 1x PBS and resuspended in FACs buffer (0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA in PBS). Staining with extracellular fluorochrome coupled-antibodies was carried out in 100uL of FACs buffer for 20 minutes in the dark at 4 °C. Antibodies used for macrophage phenotyping were: CD80 (BV605 BD Biosciences), CD83 (BV650, BD Biosciences), CD86 (BV786, BD Biosciences), CD200R (PE, Biolegend), CD206 (Alexa-Fluor647, BD Biosciences), CD209 (BV421, BD Biosciences). Viability staining was performed by adding one drop of Sytox green flow reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific) to samples prior to analysis. Compensation was performed using either Ultracomp eBeads plus compensation beads (Invitrogen). All samples were rewashed in FACs buffer once before being analyzed using a BD LSR-Fortessa X20 cell analyzer. Data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Endothelial Microparticle Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Complement ELISAs were purchased from Quidel (San Diego, CA). For flow cytometry, sizing beads (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), counting beads (Life Technologies) and compensation beads (Invitrogen) were used for gating and counting. Antibodies to identify endothelial microparticles included anti‐CD41a (eBiosciences, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), anti‐CD105 (Novus Bio, Littleton, CO), anti–immunoglobulin G (ABcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti‐C3b/iC3b (mAb 3E7, generated as previously described).39 Factor D–depleted serum and purified factor D were purchased from Complement Technologies (Tyler, TX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Staining and Tetramer Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 (Invitrogen, RRID:AB_467133) and extracellular targets were stained at 4°C for 30 minutes. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (BD Biosciences, RRID:AB_2869008), then washed once in Perm/Wash buffer (RRID:AB_2869011) and incubated with antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C. For the tetramer assay, samples were re-suspended in tetramer solution containing OVA tetramer-SIINFEKL (NIH Tetramer Core) and incubated at 4°C for 45 minutes. All antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table S5. Cells were analyzed using a Cytoflex (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Cell number was counted using CountingBright absolute counting beads (Invitrogen). Single stain controls for each fluorochrome were prepared using cells or compensation beads (Invitrogen, 01–222-42) for compensation. Data was analyzed by FlowJo software (RRID:SCR_008520).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Plasma Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To 50 μL of plasma, 5 μL of CD14 PE and 5 μL of CD16 PECy7 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) were added. Simultaneously, compensation beads (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were incubated with the antibodies. Isotype controls for the antibodies of interest (IgG1 k, PE and IgG1 k PECy7) were included. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, LSRII, San Jose, CA). The instrument was cleaned before analyzing each set of samples. Filtered water, phosphate-buffered saline, and antibodies alone were also tested to confirm elimination of background. Size beads (sub-micron particle size reference kit, ThermoFisher Scientific, .1, .2, .5 and 1 μm) functioned as size markers, and a log scale for forward scatter and side scatter parameters was used. Flow cytometry gates were set at <1 μm and .2 μm. Flow analysis was performed with FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Marker Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected in the same manner as described in the Protein Extraction section. For each sample, 4 × 105–1 × 106 cells were stained. First, live cells were identified by adding 1 μL of eBioscience Fixable Viability Dye was added per 1 × 106 cells for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark. Cells were then centrifuged at 500xg at room temperature for 5 minutes, washed with FACS buffer (PBS containing 0.05% azide and 2% FBS), then stained with 5 μL of phycoerythrin (PE) mouse anti-human E-cadherin antibody (BD Biosciences, 562870) per 1 × 106 cells for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were washed twice, then fixed and permeabilized using eBioscience IC Fixation Buffer and Permeabilization Buffers (Thermo Fischer Scientific, 88-8824-00) as described by the manufacturer. Cells were stained with 5 μL of Alexa 488 mouse anti-human vimentin antibody (BD Biosciences, 562338) per 1 × 106 cells for 20 minutes at room temperature. Samples were washed once with 1X Permeabilization Buffer and once with FACS buffer. Finally, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer and analyzed on a BD LSRII flow cytometry (BD Biosciences). As a staining control, compensation beads (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 01-2222-41) were also stained with PE mouse anti-human E-cadherin stain and Alexa 488 mouse anti-human vimentin stain, and fixed following staining. Gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!