The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using nano easy spray source

1

Proteomic Analysis of A. alternata

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteomic analysis was performed in the Proteomics Unit of the Complutense University of Madrid, a member of ProteoRed, and supported by grant PT17/0019 of PE I+D+i 2013–2016, funded by ISCIII and ERDF.
Peptides digest from the A. alternata extract were analyzed by RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS in an EASY-nLC 1000 System coupled to the Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer through a Nano-Easy spray source (all from Thermo Scientific).
Then, 1 µg of peptides was loaded first onto a pre-column Acclaim PepMap 100 Trapping column (Thermo Scientific, 20 mm × 75 μm ID, 3 μm C18 resin with 100 Å pore size) and then separated and eluted on an analytical reverse-phase Easy Spray column (Pepmap RSLC C18n 500 mm × 75 μm ID, 2 μm C18 resin with 100 Å pore size) with an integrated spray tip. A 150 min gradient of 2% to 35% Buffer B (100% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) in Buffer A (0.1% formic acid) at a constant flow rate of 250 nl/min was used for the elution of peptides.
Data acquisition was performed with a Q-Exactive HF using data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and in positive mode with Xcalibur 4.0 software. From each Full MS (350–1800 Da) scan, the top 15 most abundant precursors, with charges of 2–6 in MS 1 scans, were selected for higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation with a dynamic exclusion of 20 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-UPLC-MS/MS Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried samples were resuspended in 20 μL of loading buffer and analyzed in an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system online coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid Mass Spectrometer (Lumos) (Thermo Scientific) or Q Exactive HF Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (HFX). Peptides were separated in a 75 μm × 50 cm PepMap C18 column using a 1 h linear gradient from 2 to 30% buffer B in buffer A at a flow rate of 250 nL/min (~600 bar). Peptides were introduced into the mass spectrometer using a nano Easy Spray source (Thermo Scientific) at 2000 V. Subsequent isolation and higher energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) was induced in the 20 most abundant ions per full MS scan with an accumulation time of 120 ms and an isolation width of 1.2 Da (Lumos), or 1.6 Da (HFX). All fragmented precursor ions were actively excluded from repeated selection for 30 s. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (37 (link)) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD024053.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted Proteomics for DHODH Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Desalted peptides from digested protein were analyzed by targeted proteomics to identify only the protein of interest in this study (PYRD or DHODH). The software Skyline 4.1 was used to build and optimize the PRM method for detection of unique peptides from DHODH [112 (link)]. An inclusion list consisted of m/z of resultant target candidates for each peptide was exported to Xcalibur 4.0 (Thermo Scientific) acquisition software of Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer. The final PRM methods included one protein, 49 peptides and 112 precursors. The peptides for PRM were analyzed by nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in an EASY-nLC 1000 System coupled to the Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer through the Nano-Easy spray source (all from Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). MS Data acquisition was performed in Q-Exactive HF using PRM method. Then Data were analyzed in Skyline software and identified with Mascot search engine thorough Proteome discoverer 2.2 software (Thermo Scientific). Peptides identifications based on MSMS data were used by skyline to generate a spectral library. To confirm DHODH detection, data were processed against the PRM-library on Skyline and manually inspected to ensure consistency between the transitions detected and the sequences of peptide searched.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Shotgun Proteomics by RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The desalted protein digest was analyzed by RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS in an EASYnLC1000 System, coupled to the Q-Exactive-HF mass spectrometer through the Nano-Easy spray source (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptide identifications were carried out using the Mascotv.2 search engine through the Protein Discoverer Software. A database search was performed against SwissProt. Mascot Scores were adjusted by a percolator algorithm. The acceptance criteria for protein identification were a false discovery rate (FDR) <1% and at least one peptide identified with high confidence (CI > 95%). To determine the abundances of the identified peptides and proteins, a processing free label workflow was initiated in the first step. Finally, the results were normalized to the total amount of the peptides, equaling the total abundance among the different samples. The proteomics data were deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [27 (link),28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were suspended in a 20 μL loading buffer and analysed on an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system online coupled to either an Orbitrap FusionTm TribridTm Mass Spectrometer or a Q Exactive™ HF-X Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 75 μm × 50 cm PepMap C18 column using a 1 or 2 h linear gradient from 2–5% buffer A to 35% buffer B at a flow rate of 250 nL/min (approx. 600 bar at 40 °C). Peptides were introduced into the mass spectrometer using a nano Easy Spray source (Thermo Scientific) at 2000 V. The ion transfer tube temperature was set to either 305 °C (Fusion Lumos), or 250 °C (HF-X). Subsequent isolation and higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) were induced on the 20 most abundant ions per full MS scan with an accumulation time of 128 ms and an isolation width of 1.2 Da (Fusion Lumos) or 1.6 Da (HF-X). All fragmented precursor ions were actively excluded from repeated selection for 8 s (Fusion) or 15 s (HF-X). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository [31 (link)] with the dataset identifiers PXD008151 and PXD024053.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Analysis of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh CM samples were concentrated from 20 mL to approximately 2 mL by using Vivaspin® 20 Centrifugal Concentrators 10K (Sartorius Stedim Lab Ltd., Stonehouse, UK). Proteinase K 500 μg/mL in PBS was added to break the exosomal membranes. A total of 6 samples corresponding to three biological replicates of each group (control and treated samples) were analysed. The proteomic analysis was performed at the Proteomics Unit of the Complutense University of Madrid (Spain) as reported elsewhere [93 (link)]. Briefly, 50 μg of each protein extract was concentrated in a stacking gel. The bands of proteins were cut from the gel, reduced, alkylated and trypsin digested o/n. Then the peptides from the digested proteins were desalted and concentrated with C18 reverse phase chromatography, eluted, freeze-dried in speed-vac and resuspended in acetonitrile/formic acid. The desalted peptides were analysed by a reverse phase liquid chromatography electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS) in an EASY-nLC 1000 System coupled to the Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer (an ultra-high-field mass orbitrap analyser) through the Nano-Easy spray source (all from Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). All data were acquired using data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and in positive mode with the Xcalibur 4.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein profile of EVs and cell-extracts was analysed by 10% SDS-PAGE using 20 μg protein from each extract of the three replicates. Several bands were excised and identified by peptide fingerprint and fragmentation following comparison with the NCBIprot database (Inbiotec, Leon, Spain). In addition, PBS-extracts obtained in three independent biological replicates were mixed and analysed by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (Proteomic Unit, CAI Técnicas Biológicas, U.C.M. Madrid). In short, desalted protein digests were analysed by RP-LC–ESI–MS/MS in an EASY-nLC 1000 System coupled to the Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer through the Nano-Easy spray source (all from Thermo Scientific, Mississagua, ON, Canada). Database search was performed against UniProt database (SwissProt and TrEMBL) with taxonomic restriction to L. plantarum. Detailed information of these procedures is described in the supplementary material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano-UPLC-MS/MS for Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were suspended in 20 μl of loading buffer (1% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA in water) and analyzed on an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system online coupled to a Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 75 μm × 50 cm PepMap C18 column using a 1h linear gradient from 5 to 25% buffer B in buffer A at a flow rate of 250 nL/min (∼600 bar). Peptides were introduced into the mass spectrometer using a nano Easy Spray source (Thermo Scientific) at 2000V and ion transfer tube temperature of 305 °C. Subsequent isolation and higher energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) was induced on the most abundant ions per full MS scan at 2 s cycle time. Ions with a charge of 2–4 were measured at an accumulation time of 120 ms, AGC target of 200,000, quadrupole isolation width of 1.2 Da, and energy level 28. All fragmented precursor ions were actively excluded from repeated selection for 60 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tryptic Protein Digestion and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptic digest separation of protein extracts was performed on a PepMap RSLC Easy-spray C18 column (2 μm, 100 Å, 75 μm x 150 mm) using the EASY-neck 1000 nano UHPLC system (ThermoFisher Scientific) connected to an LTQ-Orbitrap XL hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nano EASY-Spray source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The analytical separation was run for 180 min using a multi-step gradient of 0.1% formic acid in water as solvent (A), and 0.1% formic acid in ACN as solvent (B). 0–25% eluent B was used in 150 min and 25–60% B in 20 min followed by 60% B in 10 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min and a column temperature at 45 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive mode with a spray voltage set at 2.0 kV and the heated capillary temperature was kept at 200 °C. The LTQ-Orbitrap XL was operated in data-dependent mode in which one cycle of experiments consisted of one full-MS survey scan using the Orbitrap mass analyzer and subsequently five sequential MS/MS events of the most intense peaks using collision-induced dissociation (CID) in the LTQ. The MS survey scans were performed on the high resolution Orbitrap (R = 30,000) with an m/z range of 350–2000. Precursor ions with charge 1 or unassigned charge were rejected, and the isolation width was set to 3 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried samples were resuspended in 20 μL of loading buffer and analyzed in an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system online coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion™ Lumos™ Tribrid™ Mass Spectrometer (Lumos) (Thermo Scientific) or Q Exactive™ HF Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ Mass Spectrometer (HFX). Peptides were separated in a 75 μm × 50 cm PepMap C18 column using a 1 h linear gradient from 2 to 30% buffer B in buffer A at a flow rate of 250 nL/min (∼600 bar). Peptides were introduced into the mass spectrometer using a nano Easy Spray source (Thermo Scientific) at 2000 V.
Subsequent isolation and higher energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) was induced in the 20 most abundant ions per full MS scan with an accumulation time of 120 ms and an isolation width of 1.2 Da (Lumos), or 1.6 Da (HFX). All fragmented precursor ions were actively excluded from repeated selection for 30 s. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE(39) partner repository with the data set identifier PXDXXX (this ID will be made available upon manuscript acceptance).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!