The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

High vacuum carbon tabs

Manufactured by SPI Supplies
Sourced in United States, Japan

High vacuum carbon tabs are a type of laboratory equipment used for sample preparation and analysis. They provide a stable and conductive surface for mounting small samples in high-vacuum environments, such as those found in scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) and other analytical instruments. The carbon tabs offer a consistent and uniform surface that helps to ensure accurate and reliable results during sample analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using high vacuum carbon tabs

1

Morphological Characterization of PLA Blends

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was used to investigate the morphology of the samples. Bar specimens of PLA-c, PLA-g-TPCS, PLA-GRH, and PLA-g-TPCS-GRH blends were produced by compression molding using pellets from the twin-screw extruder. Bars of PLA-g-TPCS and PLA-g-TPCS-GRH were immersed in liquid nitrogen for ~3 min, then fractured by hand, treated with hydrochloric acid (6 N) for 6 h to remove the TPCS phase, and air dried for 12 h in a fume hood [17 (link)]. Finally, the samples were mounted on aluminum stubs using carbon suspension cement (SPI Supplies, West Chester, PA, USA). Samples of films evaluated before and after tensile testing were also mounted on aluminum stubs with high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI Supplies) and coated with iridium at a thickness of ~2.7 nm. Samples were examined in a JEOL 6610LV (tungsten hairpin emitter) and a JEOL 7500F (field emission emitter) scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at various magnifications at 10 and 3.0 kV, respectively.
AFM was conducted using a Cypher™ atomic force microscope (Oxford Instruments Asylum Research, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) in the contact mode. Roughness parameters, calculated as the root mean square (Rq) and average roughness (Ra), were determined for each type of film and were calculated from the Htr mode image. Images were obtained in the Dfr mode. The film area for the determination of roughness was 900 μm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Plant Stems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh nine-week stems were cut horizontally with a razor blade and fixed at 4°C for 1–2 h in 4% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.4. Following a brief rinse in the buffer, the samples were dehydrated in an ethanol series (25, 50, 75, and 95%) for 15 min at each gradation and with three 15 min changes in 100% ethanol. Samples were critical point dried in a Leica Microsystems model EM CPD300 critical point dryer (Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria) using carbon dioxide as the transitional fluid. Samples were mounted on aluminum stubs using high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI Supplies, West Chester, PA, USA) and System Three Quick Cure 5 epoxy glue (System Three Resins, Inc. Auburn, WA, USA). Samples were coated with osmium (~10 nm thickness) in an NEOC-AT osmium chemical vapor deposition (CVD) coater (Meiwafosis Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and examined in a JEOL 7500F (field emission emitter) SEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an angle of ~70° between the longitudinal direction of the stem and the plane of image acquisition. Samples were prepared using three biological stems for each sample, and the images were acquired in triplicate (n = 3) at 200×, 14,000×, and 22,000× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Algae-Fungi Interactions via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy was performed to investigate the physical interaction between N. oceanica and fungi at the Center for Advanced Microscopy of Michigan State University (CAM, MSU). Algae–fungi aggregates were collected after 6-day co-culture of the alga N. oceanica with M. elongata (AG77 and NVP64) or M. americana 3668S and were fixed in 4% (v/v) glutaraldehyde solution, followed by drying in a critical point dryer (Model 010, Balzers Union). The samples were then mounted on aluminum stubs with high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI Supplies), and were coated with osmium using a NEOC-AT osmium coater (Meiwafosis). The samples were observed with a JSM-7500F scanning electron microscope (Japan Electron Optics Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cucumber Exocarp Microscopy Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation and imaging of cucumber fruit exocarp sections (2–3 mm) was performed by the Center for Advanced Microscopy of Michigan State University as briefly described here. Exocarp tissues were fixed in glutaraldehyde solution and dried in Balzers Model 010 critical point dryer (Balzers Union Ltd., balzers, Liechtenstein). After drying, the samples were mounted on aluminum stub using high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI supplies, West Chester, PA) and coated with osmium using a NEOC-AT osmium coater (Meiwafosis Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan. Processed exocarp tissues were examined using a JEOL JSM-7500F scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Seed Micro-Structure Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect any potential micro-structural differences between the lens (see results) of the two contrasting genotypes, we employed an SEM approach. Sample preparation and SEM were conducted at the Center of Advanced Microscopy at Michigan State University. Twenty seeds from each genotype (PR9920–171 and TARS-HT1) were mounted on the aluminum stubs using high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI supplies, West Chester, PA). The seeds were coated with osmium (~ 10 nm thickness) in an NEOC-AT osmium chemical vapor deposition coater (Meiwafosis Co. Osaka, Japan). The seeds were imaged in a JEOL 6610LV (tungsten hairpin emitter) scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). ImageJ [69 (link)] was used to quantify the micro-crack area on the lens surface of seeds of both genotypes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Leaf Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM samples were prepared and scanned at the Center for Advanced Microscopy, MSU. Leaf samples were fixed at 4 °C for one and a half hours in 4% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.4. Following a brief rinse in the buffer, samples were dehydrated in an ethanol series (25%, 50%, 75%, 95%) for 50-60 min each, and then in 100% ethanol for one hour three times. Samples were dried in a Leica Microsystems model EM CPD300 critical point dryer (Leica Microsystems) using liquid carbon dioxide as the transitional fluid. Samples were then mounted on aluminum stubs using high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI Supplies) and coated with osmium (~ 10 nm thickness) in an NEOC-AT osmium coater (Meiwafosis Co., Ltd.). Finally, samples were examined with a JEOL JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope with SEI mode at 12 kV accelerating voltage, 30 spot size and ~15 mm working distance (JEOL Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!