The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using cx 5461

1

Erythroid Differentiation and CX-5461 Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human CD34+ cells were cultured in erythroid differentiation medium as described above. Treatment with the RNA polymerase I inhibitor CX-5461 (Millipore) was started on day 3 of differentiation. Flow cytometry analysis was performed at 72 hours of CX-5461 treatment, with propidium iodide (eBioscience), 1:40 APC-conjugated CD235a (glycophorin A, clone HIR2, eBioscience), 1:40 FITC-conjugated CD41a (clone HIP8, eBioscience) and 1:40 FITC-conjugated CD11b (clone ICRF44, BioLegend). Samples were run on a BD LSRFortessa. Protein lysates for Western blot analyses were collected at 72 hours of CX-5461 treatment. The Western blot procedure is described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Drosophila Testis Preparation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testes were squashed, frozen in liquid nitrogen and fixed using methanol/acetone (Cenci et al., 1994 (link)) or 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min. Primary antibodies diluted in PBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA were incubated overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor conjugates, Molecular Probes) incubations were for 1 h at room temperature. For FISH, testes were fixed in PFA, frozen and passed through a cold ethanol series; probes based on Tsai et al. (2011 (link)) were directly labelled with Alexa Fluor conjugates (Eurofins; AATAC-488 for Y, 359 bp-546 for X) and 10 ng was used overnight at 20°C.
Testes were incubated with 300 nM CX5461 (Millipore) or 2 µg/ml actinomycin D (Sigma) for 30 min, followed by EU labelling (1 mM EdU, 30 min). For total protein extracts, 50 larval testes were lysed in 300 mM NaCl. Chromatin and nuclear soluble protein extracts were isolated from 100 larval testes by hypotonic extraction of nuclei, followed by lysis in 300 mM NaCl and centrifugation at 4000 g. Live imaging of larval testes was performed as previously described (Dunleavy et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Generation and Maintenance of 5-FU Resistant Oral Cancer Cell Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line SAS was acquired from the Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research in Tohoku University. FR2-SAS cells (originally named SAS/FR2 cells in Nagata et al. 2011 (link)) were previously generated from SAS cells (Nagata et al. 2011 (link)), and 5-FU-resistance was maintained by culturing the cells in a medium containing 10 µM 5-FU. SAS and FR2-SAS cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, in a humidified, 37°C atmosphere with 5% CO2. 5-FU (Wako), i6A (Cayman Chemical Company), CX-5461 (Millipore) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle (Nacalai Tesque) were used in experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell culture and drug treatment protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in DMEM (high glucose) supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin, 10% FCS and were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. U2OS cells were purchased from ATCC and HeLa cells were kindly provided by M. Kühl and were purchased from Sigma (Steinheim, Germany). HEK293A GFP-LC3 cells (ECACC 14050801) were purchased from Sigma (Steinheim, Germany) and were cultured in medium supplemented with 0.4 mg/mL G418 (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) [34 (link),40 (link)]. Cell lines were regularly tested for absence of mycoplasma and were used in low passage numbers.
HeLa and U2OS cells were seeded in 6-wells and were transfected with 45 nM si RNAs for 48 h using Oligofectamine according to the manufacturer´s instructions. For drug treatment, cells were seeded in 6-wells and grown over night prior administration of DMSO (Sigma) or 1 µM CX-5461 (Caymen, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) for 24 h as indicated. For flux assays in HEK293A GFP-LC3, cells were incubated with DMSO or 1 µM CX-5461 for 20.5 h followed by 50 µM chloroquine (CQ; Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) for 3.5 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Polymerase Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNA Pol I inhibition, cells were treated with 1 μM BMH21 (Selleckchem), 10 ng/ml ActD (Sigma-Aldrich), or 1 μM CX5461 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 min or 2 hr. For RNA Pol II inhibition, cells were treated with (1) 5 μg/ml ActD for 2 h, (2) 2.5 μM Flavopiridol (Selleckchem) for 3 hr, or (3) 32 μg/ml DRB for 3 hr. After 3 hr of DRB treatment, cells were washed with PBS for 3 times and were recovered in fresh growth medium for 30 min or 60 min. For epigenetic mark inhibition, cells were treated with 80 nM TSA and 500 nM 5-Aza-dC for 6 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody and Chemical Reagent Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NPM1, TCOF1 and p53 anti-rabbit antibodies were obtained from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA). GFP antibody was purchased from Chromotek (Munich, Germany). POL I anti-rabbit antibody and GAPDH anti-mouse antibody were obtained from Santa Cruz (Dallas, TX, USA). The TRPV1 agonist capsaicin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Secondary anti-rabbit and anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated antibodies for Western blotting were obtained from GE Healthcare (Mississauga, ON, Canada). Goat anti-rabbit alexa fluor 555 and 633 conjugated secondary antibodies for immunofluorescence staining were obtained from Molecular Probes (Mississauga, ON, Canada). CX-5461 and CFA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoblot analysis of exosome components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-Flag (M2, F3165, Sigma), anti-V5 (R960-25, Life Technologies), anti-EXOSC10 (sc-374595, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-EXOSC10 (A303-98A,Bethyl Laboratory), anti-hRrp40 (EXOSC3) (sc-166568, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-EXOSC3 (sc-98776, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-hRrp41(EXOSC4) (sc-166772, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-hRrp4 (EXOSC2) (A303-886A, Bethyl Laboratory), anti-MTR4 (A300-614A, Bethyl Laboratory), anti-Dis3 (A303-765A, Bethyl Laboratory), anti-Nop58 (A302-719A, Bethyl Laboratory), anti-Las1L (A304-438A, Bethyl Laboratory), anti-Puromycin (clone 12D10, MABE343, EMD Millipore), anti-Ub (sc-9133, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-c-Myc (ab32072, abcam), anti-SP1 (07–645, EMD Millipore), anti-Digoxigenin-AP (11093274910, Roche), anti-USP36 (14783–1-AP, Proteintech) and anti-RPL30 (sc-98106, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies were purchased. Anti-RPL5, anti-RPL11 and anti-RPS27a were described previously (56–58 (link)). Rabbit polyclonal anti-SUMO1 and anti-SUMO2/3 antibodies were provided by Dr Yoshiaki Azuma (University of Kansas). Rabbit anti-USP36 serum was provided by Dr Masayuki Komada (Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan) (26 (link),29 (link)). Puromycin (Life Technologies), doxycycline (Dox; Sigma), actinomycin D (Act D; Sigma), CX-5461 (Sigma), RNase A (Thermo Scientific) and RNase T1 (Thermo Scientific) were purchased.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Cellular Genotoxic Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated with these genotoxic agents at the following doses for 24–72 h prior to downstream analysis with the ALT assays used in this study: pyridostatin/PDS (Sigma) 5 μM; camptothecin/CPT (Sigma) 50 nM; etoposide/ETO (Sigma) 0.5 μM; PJ34 (Calbiochem) 5 μM; veliparib (Stratech) 5 μM; olaparib (Selleckchem) 5 μM; niraparib (Stratech) 5 μM; talazoparib (Selleckchem) 5 μM; CX-5461 (Sigma) 1 μM; hydroxyurea/HU (Sigma) 50–400 μM and aphidicolin/APH (Sigma) 0.2–0.4 μM. Formaldehyde (500 μM, Sigma) was added to cells for one hour, then media was changed and downstream analysis performed at 48–72 h, as with other agents. Negative controls with the drug diluent (water, PBS or DMSO) but without drug were included with each assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Damage Response in Chd1 Mutant ESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chd1fl/Δ and Chd1Δ/Δ (established) ES cells were used. Cells were incubated for indicated durations and concentrations with Triptolide (Sigma), Etoposide (Sigma), or CX-5461 (Sigma). Control cells were treated with DMSO. Inhibitors were withdrawn and cells were washed immediately prior to detection of double-stranded DNA breaks and qPCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Establishment and in vivo evaluation of PDX models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serially transplantable patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were established by the Monash Urological Research Alliance (MURAL) according to human and animal ethics approvals (37) . Organoid cultures of PDX tissue were grown using previously described methods (37, 38) . For in vivo experiments, mice received vehicle, 50 mg/kg CX-5461 (Ark Pharm), 0.33 mg/kg talazoparib (Selleck Chemicals), or 35 mg/kg CX-5461 and 0.33 mg/kg talazoparib by oral gavage. The vehicle for talazoparib was phosphate buffered solution with 10% dimethylacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 6% solutol (Sigma-Aldrich), and the vehicle for CX-5461 was 50 mmol/L sodium bicarbonate for in vivo experiments. For acute treatment, grafts were collected 4 or 24 hours after a single dose of CX-5461 and/or talazoparib, administered at the same time. For long-term treatment, CX-5461 was dosed twice a week and talazoparib 5 days a week. This dosing schedule for each compound is consistent with previous studies in mice (31, 32, 39, 40) , and it mimics the dosing regimen for patients (24, 25, 41) in the context of rapidly growing PDXs. IHC was performed using antibodies in Supplementary Table S3 and scored using Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!