The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using genex

1

Temporal Transcriptional Profiling of A. solani Infection in Potato Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extraction from infected leaves of potato 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 h post-inoculation (hpi) with A. solani SH0806 was carried out using the FastePure® Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). cDNA was synthesized using the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The primers were designed to anneal to sequences in regions spanning at least one intron to ensure no genomic DNA disturbance except those for aygB, brm3, and lccG due to the lack of introns. Real-time detection was carried out on the CFX ConnectTM Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and real-time PCR data was analyzed using the program GENEX (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The relative expression levels of asmr1 and thirteen genes including pksA, aygA, aygB, brm1, brm2, brm3, lccA, lccB, lccC, lccD, lccE, lccF, and lccG [JGI (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Altso1/Altso1.home.html) with transcript IDs 115231, 121832, 121729, 112195, 115171, 120096, 117354, 116243, 119329, 111647, 1181013, 115914, and 114865, respectively] were standardized to those of A. solani actin1 (GenBank accession number MK388241.1) and ef1α (GenBank accession number MN370901.1), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Melanoma Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was carried out with Bio-Rad CFX Manager software (ver. 3.2.2) and GenEx (ver.6). To analyze gene expression stability of HKGs, geNorm algorithm, included on CFX Manager software (ver. 3.2.2), was used35 . The expression ratio of the genes of interest was normalized relative to the abundance of the two reference genes (HBS2, GUSβ) using the ΔΔCq method. Samples were divided in two groups, melanomas (MM) and melanocytomas (MCT) and were tested for parametric data distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) Test. Changes in the relative gene expression between groups were calculated using Mann-Whitney Test for unpaired data, because the data were not-normally distributed. All expression values are presented as means in a base 2 logarithmic scale with a confidence interval of 95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whether the expression of certain target genes in PAO1 could be reproducibly induced or affected by systematic co-culturing under multi-strain growth conditions was investigated. Relative mRNA expression was quantified using the efficiency-corrected comparative Ct method, and the expression levels of the same genes in mono- and co-cultures of PAO1 and S. mitis were compared. In this study, the expression of target genes in mono-cultures acted as the control. The Ct values of both the control and the genes in question were then normalized to that of the PAO1 housekeeping gene (rpsL) (Yang et al., 2012 (link)).
After Q-PCR amplification, the comparative threshold method (ΔΔCt analysis) was applied to evaluate the relative changes in gene expression in the Q-PCR experiments. The computer programs GenEx (Bio-Rad) and Excel (Microsoft) were used to solve the following equation: ΔΔCt = ΔΔCt, sample–ΔΔCt,reference (Bio-Rad) (Conway et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ovarian Cancer miRNA Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

To determine the miRNA expression profiles of ovarian cancer cell line (SKOV3) and Vero cell line (normal), we used quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in two panels of sample cells. The Exiqon miRCURY LNATM Universal RT microRNA PCR kit was used for all experiments. The procedure was conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The miRNA expression was measured with Biorad CFX 96. Results of measurement were analysis by Biorad CFX ManagerTM and GENEX software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptomic Profiling of Atrx-Modulated OPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA was prepared using 100 ng RNA from forebrain (P14 AtrxFoxG1Cre), FANS-purified GFP+ OPC nuclei or from optic tracts (P20 AtrxSox10Cre) (RNeasy Mini kit; Qiagen Cat# 74104) and 1.5 μL of 100 ng/L of random hexamers (Integrated DNA Technologies Cat# 51-01-18-26) were diluted to a final volume of 12 μL with RNAse free water. Samples were heated at 65 °C for 10 min followed by addition of 4 µL first strand buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 18064014), 2 µL 100 mM DTT (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 18064014), 0.8 μL 25 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μL RNaseOut (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 10777019), 0.5 μL SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 18064014) and 0.5 µL RNAse free water per sample. Samples were then incubated at 30 °C for 10 minutes and 42 °C for 45 min and stored at −20 °C. cDNA was amplified with iQ SYBR Green Master Mix (BioRad Cat# 1708884) using the standard curve Ct method of quantification. Experiments were performed on a Chromo-4 thermocycler (MJ Research/BioRad) and analyzed with Opticon Monitor 3 and GeneX (BioRad) software. Technical duplicates were completed for each sample. Conditions for amplification were as follows: 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55–60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and a final melting curve generated in increments of 0.5 °C per plate read. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RT-qPCR Analysis of Liver Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from liver with the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and reverse transcribed into cDNA as described previously [40 (link)]. Control reactions without reverse transcriptase were prepared in parallel. cDNA was amplified with gene-specific primers under the following conditions: 25–35 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute. For qRT-PCR, cDNA was amplified with iQ SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad) by using the standard curve Ct method of quantification. Experiments were performed on a Chromo-4 thermocycler (MJ Research) and analyzed with Opticon Monitor 3 and GeneX (Bio-Rad) software. Gene expression analysis was repeated in duplicate for each sample. Conditions for amplification were as follows: 35 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds, 55°C for 20 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds, and a final melting curve generated in increments of 0.5°C per plate read. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative PCR of V-ATPase and Notch1 Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative PCR of V-ATPase isoforms was performed with SYBR green (Applied Biosystems) and the following primers: Atp6v0a1, 5′ GGACATGATCGACTTAGAGGCCA 3′ and 5′ ACTGCTGGGTTTTTCGCAGG 3′; Atp6v0a2, 5′ CTCTGTGTACACCGGCCTCA 3′ and 5′ CTGCAAAGTCCTGCTGTGCC 3′; Atp6v0a3, 5′ GCACCAAGCAATCCACACCA 3′ and 5′ CTCAGACAGCTGGGCATGGG 3′; Atp6v0a4, 5′ TGCCGGGGAAACGTGTACTT 3′ and 5′ AGCACGAAACCCGTCACAGA 3′. Measurement of Notch1 target genes utilized the following primer pairs: Dtx1, 5′ GTGTGCCGCAAGACCAAGAA 3′ and 5′ GAGTACATGGCCACCAGGCA 3′; Ptcra, 5′ TAGCTCCTGGCTGCAACTGG 3′ and 5′ GCATCGAGGACCAGGCAAAC 3′; Hes1, 5′ TGTCAACACGACACCGGACA 3′ and 5′ TGGAATGCCGGGAGCTATCTT 3′. Notch1 was measured with the primer pair 5′ GTGCCTGCCCTTTGAGTCTT 3′ and 5′ GCGATAGGAGCCGATCTCATTG 3′. Expression analysis was performed with GENEX (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!