The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quanta 3d feg

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom

The Quanta 3D FEG is a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and advanced analytical capabilities. It provides a stable electron beam with a small spot size, enabling detailed visualization of surface topography and microstructural features at the nanometer scale.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

132 protocols using quanta 3d feg

1

Characterization of Deformed Alloy Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phases present in the alloy sheets were identified by X-ray diffraction (Cu Kα radiation, scan rate: 2 deg per min, scan step size: 0.02 deg). EBSD analysis (step size: 0.07 μm) was also conducted using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Quanta 3D FEG, FEI Company, USA). EBSD specimens were mechanically polished and electro-polished at room temperature in a solution of CH3COOH (92%) and HClO4 (8%) at an operating voltage of 32 V. The data were interpreted by orientation imaging microscopy analysis software provided by TexSEM Laboratories, Inc. The KAM was calculated up to the fifth neighbour shell with a maximum misorientation angle of 5° (ref. 46 ). The KAM maps served as a measure of the deformation-induced local orientation gradients inside the grains. Deformed microstructures were identified by TEM (model: 2,100, JEOL, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Focused-ion beam (FIB, model: Quanta 3D FEG, FEI Company, USA) was used to prepare TEM thin foils.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Tribofilm Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The worn surfaces of the composites were characterized using an optical microscope (U-25ND25, OLYMPUS, T2,Tokyo, Japan). Nanostructures of the tribofilms were imaged with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, 7610F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Additionally, the changes in the chemical states of the tribofilms were analyzed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, 250Xi, ESCALAB, Waltham, MA, USA). Moreover, slices of the tribofilm were prepared using focused ion beam (FIB) machining (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA), and the fractured surfaces were then observed via high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM, TecnaiG2 TF20, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microstructural Characterization of Tensile-Tested Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiple characterisation techniques were used to examine the microstructures of the tensile-tested samples through backscattered electron (BSE) and EBSD analyses. The fracture surfaces of the tensile-tested samples were electro-plated with Ni to protect the surface prior to polishing. Then, the samples for BSE and EBSD measurements were mechanically polished (down to ~1 μm), followed by electrochemical polishing using a Lectropol 5 instrument. For electrochemical polishing, a solution of 95% acetic acid and 5% perchloric acid was used. Electrochemical polishing was conducted with 30 V and 50 mA at room temperature for 1.5 min. EBSD measurements were obtained for the fractured samples. An EBSD observation was acquired through field-emission SEM (Quanta 3d FEG, FEI Company, USA) equipped with an OPTIMUSTM TKD detector head (eFlashHR, ARGUSTM electron detection system, Bruker, Germany). EBSD scans were obtained with an acceleration voltage, beam current, working distance, and specimen tilting of 20 kV, 22 nA, ~7 mm, and 70°, respectively. Over 350,000 data points were obtained at a rate of 186.2 frames per second. The EBSD data were interpreted using the TSL OIM data collection software (Analysis 7). The minimum confidence index was 0.12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of CVT-grown WS2 Nanoflakes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was measured using a D2 Phaser X-ray diffractometer, and the Raman spectroscopy was measured with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm using a Raman microscope (Renishaw InVia, Wotton-under-Edge, UK); these measurements were used to confirm the crystal structure of CVT-grown WS2 crystals. The height profiles were carried out to find the thickness of nanoflakes using atomic force microscopy (AFM, Bruker-ICON2-SYS, Billerica, MA, USA). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S3000H, Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture the image of the nanoflake device to obtain the dimensions of the conduction channel. Focused ion beam (FIB, FEI Quanta 3D FEG) was utilized for the deposition of Pt contacts. The dark current-voltage (id-V) curves and photoconductive measurements of the photodetector were carried out in a four-point probe electrical measurement system using Keithly 4200-SCS. A 532 nm laser source was used for illumination and the incident laser power was measured using a calibrated power meter (Ophir Nova II) with a silicon photodiode head (Ohir PD300-UV). A holographic diffuser was utilized to minimize the error in the power density calculation by broadening the laser beam size (~20 mm2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of PbNPs/pSPCE Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed by means of a high-resolution transmission electron microscope Tecnai G2 T20 X-TWIN (FEI) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The samples were prepared for analysis by scratching the film from the surface of the electrode and placing it on a TEM copper grid. Moreover, microscopic images of the pSPCE/PbNPs surface were attained with a high-resolution scanning electron microscope Quanta 3D FEG (FEI, USA) (acceleration voltage of 5.0 kV, working distance of 9.3 mm, magnification of 25,000×).
All voltammetric studies were made using a µAutolab electrochemical analyzer (Eco Chemie, Utrecht, The Netherlands) controlled by GPES 4.9 software. The standard quartz electrochemical cell with a volume of 10 mL composed of a commercially available screen-printed carbon sensor (SPCE, DropSens, Spain, Ref. C150) was applied for experiments. The SPCE sensor consisted of a screen-printed carbon working electrode, a platinum screen-printed auxiliary electrode, and a silver screen-printed pseudo-reference electrode. The µAutolab analyzer controlled by FRA 4.9 software was used for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements.
HPLC analyses were performed on a VWR Hitachi Elite LaChrom HPLC with a PDA detector using an Ascentis Express C18 column (15 cm × 2.1 mm i.d., 2.7 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Enamel Structure Characterization via FIB-SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrathin sections of the repaired enamel for TEM characterization of the structure and crystallography were prepared with a dual-beam focused ion beam (FIB)–scanning electron microscope instrument (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI, USA), which was fitted with a liquid gallium ion source. A layer of platinum (thickness, ~1 μm) was deposited over a region of interest to protect the surface from ion beam damage during the milling processes. The thin sections were lifted out and transferred onto a copper grid for further TEM and SAED observations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparing Lamellar Specimens for HRTEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lamellar specimens for HRTEM observation were prepared by a dual-beam scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/focused ion beam (FIB) system (FEI Quanta 3D FEG and FEI Helios) based on site-specific in situ lift-out technique. Before the ion thinning, a metallic protective layer of Cr with a thickness between 30 and 40 nm was first deposited on the sample surface. Then, a platinum supporting layer with a thickness between 1 and 1.5 μm was further deposited on the targeted area using the ion beam deposition inside the chamber. This dual-beam system is capable of fast milling at a high voltage of 30 kV and subtle thinning at the final stage using a few kV (2–5 kV) Ga+ ion milling. During ion thinning, the sample was tilted between 1 and 2° towards the ion beam in order to avoid significant damage to the sample structure. The ion beam current was between 10 and 15 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cryo-FIB Milling for High-resolution Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryo-FIB milling (Rigort et al., 2012b (link)) was performed as described in detail at Bio-protocol (Schaffer et al., 2015 (link)). Plunge-frozen grids were mounted into autogrids that were modified for FIB milling (Autogrid sample holder, FEI), providing stability to the EM grids during sample preparation and transfers. These autogrids were mounted into a dual-beam (FIB/SEM) microscope (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI) using a cryo-transfer system (PP3000T, Quorum) with a custom-built transfer shuttle. During FIB operation, samples were kept at a constant temperature of −180°C using a homemade 360° rotatable cryo-stage (Rigort et al., 2010 (link), 2012a (link)). To improve sample conductivity and reduce curtaining artifacts during FIB milling, the whole Autogrid was coated by organometallic platinum (protocol adapted from Hayles et al., 2007 (link)) using the in situ gas injection system (GIS, FEI) and the following parameters: 13.5 mm stage working distance, 26°C GIS pre-heating temperature, and 4 s gas injection time. Thin lamellas were prepared using the Ga+ ion beam at 30 kV under a shallow 8°–12° angle. Rough milling was performed with a rectangular pattern and 0.3 nA beam current, followed by sequentially lowered beam currents of 0.1 nA, 50 pA and 30 pA during the thinning and cleaning steps. During the milling, the specimen was also imaged using the SEM at 3–5 kV and 5–30 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of FZS900

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI Quanta 3D FEG) was utilized to observe the surface morphology of FZS900. A tiny sample was directly adhered to the double-coated carbon-conductive tabs on stubs. Then the stub was gilded with Pt for 60 s to enhance the sample conductivity prior to SEM observation under 5 kV. Data are presented in Figure 2 (B, F).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Imaging of Dentate Gyrus Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The embedded slices were placed on a metal stub and further trimmed with glass and diamond knives in an ultramicrotome (Ultracut E microtome, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The slices were coated with a protective layer of carbon, which prevented any charge. The metal stub with the slices was set on the stage of FIB/SEM. The serial section images in the middle molecular layer of the dorsal DG were automatically obtained by FIB/SEM (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Serial images of the block face were acquired by repeated cycles of sample surface milling and imaging using the Slice & View G2 operating software (FEI). The milling was performed with a gallium ion beam at 30 kV with a current of 1.0 nA or 3.0 nA (Golgi stain). The milling pitch was set to 15 or 30 (Golgi stain) nm/step. The images were acquired at an accelerating voltage of 2.5 kV. The other acquisition parameters were as follows: dwell time = 6 s/pixel, pixel size = 4.9 and 14.6 (Golgi stain) nm/pixel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!