M 24 cell harvester
The M-24 cell harvester is a laboratory equipment designed for the automated harvesting of cells. It functions by efficiently and accurately separating cells from their culture medium, preparing them for further analysis or experimentation.
Lab products found in correlation
7 protocols using m 24 cell harvester
Cell Proliferation Assay with Ceramides
Quantification of Aβ(1-42) Aggregates Binding
Amylin Aggregates Binding Assay
Radioligand Binding Assay for Prion Protein Aggregates
125I-labelled flavonoid derivatives
(0.15–8.75 kBq, 6–350 nM) and
rMoPrP aggregates (100 nM) in NaCl/HEPES buffer (50 mM
HEPES/KOH, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) containing 20% (v/v) dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO). After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, the
mixture was then filtered through Whatman GF/B filters using a Brandel M-24 cell
harvester. Each assay tube before filtration and the filters containing the
bound 125I ligand were measured by an automatic gamma counter and
the bound/free ratio of [125I]ligand was calculated. The
dissociation constant (Kd) and binding capacity
(Bmax) of compounds were estimated by Scatchard analysis
using PRISM4 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). For competitive binding assays,
the mixture contained [125I]SC-NMe2(0.02 nM), test compound
(8.0 pM–12.5 μM), and rMoPrP
aggregates (100 nM) in NaCl/HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 20%
(v/v) DMSO. After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, the
mixture was filtered and the filters were measured using the gamma counter.
Nonspecific binding was defined in the presence of 10 μM
for nonradioactive SC-NMe2. Values for the half maximal inhibitory
concentration (IC50) were determined from displacement curves of
three independent experiments using PRISM4, and those for the inhibition
constant (Ki) were calculated using the
Cheng–Prusoff equation.
Amyloid-β Aggregation Assay
Peptide Binding Affinity for Opioid Receptors
Characterizing CB1 Receptor Binding Kinetics
from Chem-1 cells expressing the human CB1 receptors (ChemiSCREEN
CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Membrane Preparation. Merck, USA) were incubated
in duplicate with 1 nM [3H]CP-55,940 (specific activity:
108.5 Ci/mmole, PerkinElmer, USA) in a 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH =
7.4 buffer supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2% BSA and increasing concentrations of the compounds
tested. Compounds were dissolved in 50% DMSO and added to the reaction
mixture at 10 concentrations equally spaced on a log scale (10–10–10–4.5 M). The final DMSO
concentration was 5%. Nonspecific binding was determined with 10 μM
WIN 55,212-2. The reaction mixture (500 μL) was incubated for
1.5 h at 30 °C. Before harvesting, Brandel Whatman GF/B Filter
Paper was presoaked with 0.5% polyethylenimine buffer for 30 min and
then washed with 2 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH = 7.4) containing
0.5% BSA to minimize nonspecific binding. The reaction was terminated
by depositing the samples onto the filter paper with the Brandel M-24
Cell Harvester. Samples were then rapidly washed three times with
2 mL of wash buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, and
5 mM MgCl2) to separate the bound radioligand from the
free one. The rest of the procedure was the same as for CB2.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!