The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

M 24 cell harvester

Manufactured by Brandel Inc
Sourced in United Kingdom

The M-24 cell harvester is a laboratory equipment designed for the automated harvesting of cells. It functions by efficiently and accurately separating cells from their culture medium, preparing them for further analysis or experimentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using m 24 cell harvester

1

Cell Proliferation Assay with Ceramides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A498 or UO-31 cells were plated in complete RPMI at 3,500 or 2,000 cells per well of a 96-well plate, respectively. After allowing cells to attach overnight, cells were treated with 0.1% DMSO (vehicle), or increasing concentrations of englerin A, C8-ceramide, or C8-ceramide-1-phosphate and incubated for 48 h. All conditions were conducted in triplicate. Cells were pulsed with [3H]-thymidine (1.6 μCi/well) during the last 7 h of incubation and then trypsinized and deposited onto glass microfiber filters using the Brandel M 24 cell harvester (Gaithersburg, MD). Incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA was then determined by counting in a scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Aβ(1-42) Aggregates Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A solid form of Aβ(1–42) was purchased from the Peptide Institute (Osaka, Japan). Aggregation was carried out by gently dissolving the peptide (0.25 mg/mL) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4). The solution was incubated at 37°C for 42 h with gentle and constant shaking. A mixture containing 50 μL of Aβ(1–42) aggregates (final conc., 1.25 μg/mL), 50 μL of the 99mTc-Ham complex (8 kBq), 50 μL of PIB (final conc., 64 pM-125 μM in EtOH), and 850 μL of 30% EtOH was incubated at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was filtered through Whatman GF/B filters (Whatman, Kent, U.K.) using a Brandel M-24 cell harvester (Brandel, Maryland, USA), and the radioactivity of the filters containing the bound 99mTc-Ham complex was measured using a γ counter (Wallac 1470 Wizard). Values for the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) were determined from displacement curves using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Amylin Aggregates Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mixture containing 50 μL of nonradioactive derivatives in DMSO (final conc., 0.5 pM-25 μM), 50 μL of [125I]IPBF (final conc., 0.025 nM), 50 μL of amylin aggregates (final conc., 25 nM), and 850 μL of PBS containing 10% DMSO was incubated at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was then filtered through GF/B filters (Whatman) using an M-24 cell harvester (Brandel), and the radioactivity of the filters containing the bound 125I ligand were measured in a γ counter (Wallac 1470 Wizard; Perkin Elmer). Values for the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) were determined from displacement curves using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (Graphpad Software), and those for the inhibition constant (Ki) were calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff equation: Ki = IC50/(1 + [L]/Kd), where [L] is the concentration of [125I]IPBF used in the assay and Kd is the dissociation constant of IPBF (8.31 nM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Radioligand Binding Assay for Prion Protein Aggregates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The saturation assays were performed by mixing an appropriate concentration of
125I-labelled flavonoid derivatives
(0.15–8.75 kBq, 6–350 nM) and
rMoPrP aggregates (100 nM) in NaCl/HEPES buffer (50 mM
HEPES/KOH, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) containing 20% (v/v) dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO). After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, the
mixture was then filtered through Whatman GF/B filters using a Brandel M-24 cell
harvester. Each assay tube before filtration and the filters containing the
bound 125I ligand were measured by an automatic gamma counter and
the bound/free ratio of [125I]ligand was calculated. The
dissociation constant (Kd) and binding capacity
(Bmax) of compounds were estimated by Scatchard analysis
using PRISM4 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). For competitive binding assays,
the mixture contained [125I]SC-NMe2(0.02 nM), test compound
(8.0 pM–12.5 μM), and rMoPrP
aggregates (100 nM) in NaCl/HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 20%
(v/v) DMSO. After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, the
mixture was filtered and the filters were measured using the gamma counter.
Nonspecific binding was defined in the presence of 10 μM
for nonradioactive SC-NMe2. Values for the half maximal inhibitory
concentration (IC50) were determined from displacement curves of
three independent experiments using PRISM4, and those for the inhibition
constant (Ki) were calculated using the
Cheng–Prusoff equation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Amyloid-β Aggregation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A solid form of Aβ(1–40) was purchased from the Peptide Institute (Osaka, Japan). Aggregation was carried out by gently dissolving the peptide (0.50 mg/mL) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4). The solution was incubated at 37 °C for 42 h with gentle and constant shaking. A mixture containing 50 μL Aβ(1–40) aggregates (final conc., 1.25 μg/mL), 50 μL 99mTc-Ham complex (final conc., 8.3 kBq/mL), 50 μL PIB (final conc., 64 pM–125 μM in 30% EtOH), and 850 μL of 30% EtOH was incubated at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was filtered through Whatman GF/B filters (Whatman, Kent, U.K.) using a Brandel M-24 cell harvester (Brandel, Maryland, USA), and the radioactivity of the filters containing the bound 99mTc-Ham complex was measured using a γ counter (Wallac 1470 Wizard; PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA). Values for the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) were determined from displacement curves using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Peptide Binding Affinity for Opioid Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The binding affinity of peptidomimetics 19 and reference compoundsTyr-d-Ala-Gly-Phe-NH2 for MOR and DOR was determined in competitive radioligand binding assays according to the method previously described [40 (link),41 (link),42 (link)]. The specific radioligands were [3H]DAMGO (DAMGO (a specific MOR ligand) and [3H][Ile5,6]DELT II]) (a specific DOR ligand). Membrane fractions of rat brain homogenate were incubated at 25 °C for 60 min in the presence of radioligands (0.5 nM) specific for each receptor and the increasing concentrations of the tested compounds. For measuring non-specific binding, 10 μM naloxone was used as the competitor for opioid receptors. The reactions were carried out in assay buffer containing Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) with an addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and protease inhibitors (bacitracin, bestatin, captopril). After the incubation, the binding reactions were terminated by rapid filtration with M-24 Cell Harvester (Brandel/USA) through GF/B Whatman glass fiber strips (pre-soaked with 0.5% PEI in order to minimize non-specific binding). Radioactivity retained on the filters was measured in MicroBeta LS, Trilux scintillation counter (PerkinElmer, USA). The experiments were repeated at least three times in duplicate. The IC50 value for each compound was determined using GraphPad Prism [43 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing CB1 Receptor Binding Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane preparations
from Chem-1 cells expressing the human CB1 receptors (ChemiSCREEN
CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Membrane Preparation. Merck, USA) were incubated
in duplicate with 1 nM [3H]CP-55,940 (specific activity:
108.5 Ci/mmole, PerkinElmer, USA) in a 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH =
7.4 buffer supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2% BSA and increasing concentrations of the compounds
tested. Compounds were dissolved in 50% DMSO and added to the reaction
mixture at 10 concentrations equally spaced on a log scale (10–10–10–4.5 M). The final DMSO
concentration was 5%. Nonspecific binding was determined with 10 μM
WIN 55,212-2. The reaction mixture (500 μL) was incubated for
1.5 h at 30 °C. Before harvesting, Brandel Whatman GF/B Filter
Paper was presoaked with 0.5% polyethylenimine buffer for 30 min and
then washed with 2 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH = 7.4) containing
0.5% BSA to minimize nonspecific binding. The reaction was terminated
by depositing the samples onto the filter paper with the Brandel M-24
Cell Harvester. Samples were then rapidly washed three times with
2 mL of wash buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, and
5 mM MgCl2) to separate the bound radioligand from the
free one. The rest of the procedure was the same as for CB2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!