The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mira4 lmh

Manufactured by TESCAN
Sourced in Czechia

The MIRA4 LMH is a high-performance scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for advanced imaging and analysis. It features a large chamber size, high resolution, and versatile capabilities for a wide range of applications. The core function of the MIRA4 LMH is to provide high-quality imaging and analysis of various samples, enabling users to study the topography, composition, and other characteristics of materials at the micro- and nanoscale levels.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using mira4 lmh

1

Microstructural Characterization of Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electric discharge machining (EDM) was used to cut all the coating samples to ensure no extra stress was created during the process. Then, the samples were ground and polished using abrasive papers ranging from 400 to 1200 grit and SiC suspension. Then, the samples were etched in an etchant (2.7 g Fe (NO3)3, 10 mL C2H5OH, and 10 mL deionized water) for 15 s before being measured using a scanning electron microscopic (SEM, MIRA4 LMH, TESCAN, Czech) that was equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to observe the microstructure (cross-sectional) and elemental analysis. To calculate the porosity of the coating, image analysis software employing the SEM micrographs of cross-sectional samples after polishing was used. At the same time, an optical profiler (WYKO NT9100, Veeco Metrology Inc., Plainview, NY, USA) was used to measure the surface roughness of the coating as well as its 3D morphology. In addition, the phase composition of coatings and powders were detected using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Empyren, PANalytical, The Netherlands) employing Cu-Kα radiation of 1.5418 Å with an operating voltage of 45 KV, operating current of 40 mA, 2θ range of 20–80°, and scan rate of 0.02 °/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stability Evaluation of Curcumin Nanoformulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the stability in aqueous solution,
Cur@Fe&TA and
Cur solutions were added to the same volume of CHCl3 solution,
and the diffusion/separation of the solutions was observed. The morphology
was observed by SEM (TESCAN MIRA4 LMH) at an accelerating voltage
of 20 kV and working distance of 8.88 mm. The SEM specimens were prepared
by dropping the Cur@Fe&TA solution onto a silicon wafer and freeze-drying.
In addition, we further observed the fine structure of nanomaterials
by TEM (JEM-F200) and analyzed the elemental distribution of nanoparticles
by EDS spectroscopy. The particle size and zeta potential were measured
by DLS (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90) at a laser wavelength of 633
nm, power of 4 mW, and temperature of 25 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surface Preparation and Degradation Analysis of Zinc Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pure zinc discs (purity 99.99%, 10 mm in diameter, 1 mm in thickness) were used (denoted as Zn). The entire surface of the specimen was wet ground until reaching 1200 grit with silicon carbide abrasive paper. Next, specimens were cleaned ultrasonically in absolute ethanol for 10 min. Pure Zn was further pre-treated with a complete cell culture medium under standard cell culture conditions (denoted as P-Zn). The formation of the initial degradation layer can partially mimic the degradation interface changes occurring in the early post-implantation stage, as previously reported [27 (link),28 (link),29 (link)]. Specifically, Zn discs were immersed in 2 mL Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, ExCell Bio, Shanghai, China) under standard cell culture conditions for 7 days. Surface morphology and its elemental composition were characterized by a scanning electron microscope with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy instrument (SEM-EDS, MIRA4 LMH, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic). According to ISO 10993-12: 2012 [30 ], titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) and pure Cu were used as a negative control (N.C.) and positive control (P.C.), respectively. Prior to cell culture experiments, all samples were disinfected with ultraviolet radiation for 1 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Biomaterial Samples for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biomaterial specimens (n = 3) were rinsed with PBS solution three times, dehydrated with gradient alcohol, soaked in tertiary butanol for 2 h, and freeze-dried. A carbon vacuum was coated on the surface of each sample. The BP samples were examined (5 spots per sample) using a TESCAN MIRA4 LMH (Tescan, Czech Republic) scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Implant Surface Topography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to the surface observation, sample surfaces were sputtered-coated with a 20 nm thick gold-palladium. The surface morphology was characterized by using a scanning electron microscope with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy instrument (SEM-EDS, MIRA4 LMH, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. The surface roughness was determined by an optical profiler (Bruker Countor GT K 3D, Billerica, MA, USA). Four specimens per group were measured with vertical scanning interferometry with a 1× magnification lens, a field of view of 0.4 × 0.4 mm, and a scan speed of ×1. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the ‘VXI’ mode was used to reduce the noise level in the flat area. Moreover, the tested areas were 3D reconstructed for visualizing the surface topographies. According to ISO 25178: 2012 [45 ], the height, spatial, and hybrid surface texture parameters were chosen to describe the characteristics of the implant topographies. Based on the surface scales of the craniomaxillofacial implants, the arithmetical mean height (Sa), root mean square height (Sq), texture aspect ratio (Str), and developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) were selected, as previously reported [46 ]. All parameters were determined and analyzed using the Vision 64 software (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization and Preparation of Tantalum Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tantalum nanoparticles (TaNPs) were purchased from Dk Nanotechnology (Beijing Dk Nano Technology Co, LTD, China). Morphology of TaNPs was observed by transmission electron microscope (HT7700, HITACHI, Japan). Tantalum micron particles (TaMPs) were purchased from Dk Nano Technology (Beijing Dk Nano Technology Co, LTD, China), and the morphology of TaMPs was observed by scanning electron microscope (MIRA4LMH, TESCAN, Czech). The particle size and Zeta-potential of TaNPs were analyzed by nanoparticle analyzer (SZ-100Z, HORIBA, Japan) in a deionized water mixture. TaNPs (50 ​mg) and TaMPs (50 ​mg) were sterilized by 60Co-γ Ray irradiation. The sterilized TaNPs were suspended in the complete medium, and sterile ultrasound was performed for 30 ​min to prepare 5 ​μg/mL and 5 ​mg/mL TaNPs suspensions respectively for the next step in vivo and in vitro.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Decellularized Bone Matrix Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Natural bone tissue (NBT) was selected as the control. DBM and NBT were fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde for 48 h, then decalcified and embedded within paraffin. H&E staining, DAPI staining, and PicoGreen DNA assay kit (Invitrogen, USA) were used to observe the clearance of cellular components. SR staining was used to evaluate collagen retention in the DBM. At the same time, the DBM and NBT fixed with 2.5% Glutaraldehyde at 4 °C overnight were analyzed by SEM (Mira4 LMH, TESCAN, Czech Republic) to observe the microscopic changes of the bone matrix before and after decellularization. Meanwhile, the content of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were evaluated by EDS analysis. In addition, the particle size of DBM‐MPs was evaluated with a laser particle sizer (Mastersizer 2000, UK). The microstructure of MH‐NPs was observed by TEM (JEM‐F200, Japan) and the crystal phase of MH‐NPs was evaluated by XRD (Rigaku SmartLab SE, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Zinc Deposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallographic phase and chemical composition were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/max2500) with Cu Kα radiation and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Spectro Blue Sop). The surface topography, crystal orientation, microstructure and corresponding elemental mapping were characterized by field emission scanning electrode microscopy (SEM, TESCAN MIRA4 LMH) equipped with energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS, One Max 50), atomic force microscope (AFM, Bruker Dimension Icon), confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, KEYENCE VK-X1000), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD, NordlysMax2), and transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecani F30) equipped with an EDS detector (Oxford Xplore). Note that the EBSD and CLSM samples were subjected to conventional sanding and twin-jet electropolishing processes to obtain a smooth surface and diminish the extra stress. Operando visualization of Zn deposition behavoir was carried out by coupling optical microscope (CEWEI LW750LJT) and custom-built visualization cell (BJSCISTAR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!