The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using mab4301

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells or tissue sections were washed twice in PBS, fixed in freshly prepared 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 4°C, washed once in PBS and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in blocking solution (3% goat serum plus 0.1% BSA in PBS) for 30 min at room temperature, then washed once in PBS, and left in blocking solution for 2 h. Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against Oct4 (sc5279, Santa Cruz), Nanog (ab80892, Abcam), SSEA-1 (MAB4301, Millipore), βIII-Tubulin (CBL412, Chemicon), alpha 1-fetoprotein (AFP; DAK-N1501, Dako), alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; ab5694-100, Abcam) and Nestin (MAB353, Millipore). Then cells were washed three times (each for 15 min) with blocking solution, and incubated for 2 h with secondary antibodies at room temperature. Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) FITC (115-095-003, Jackson) and Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor® 594 (111-585-003, Jackson), diluted 1:200 with blocking solution, were used. Samples were washed, and counterstained with 0.5 mg/ml Hoechst 33342 (H1398, MP) in Vectashield mounting medium. Fluorescence was detected and imaged using a Zeiss Axio-Imager Z1 fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed twice in PBS, then fixed in freshly prepared 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) for 30 min at 4 °C, washed in PBS for one time and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in blocking solution (3% goat serum plus 0.1% BSA in PBS) for 30 min at room temperature, then washed in PBS for one time, and left in blocking solution for 2 h. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against Oct4 (sc5279; Santa Cruz), Nanog (ab80892; Abcam), SSEA-1 (MAB4301; Millipore), βIII-tubulin (CBL412; Chemicon), alpha 1-fetoprotein (AFP; DAK-N1501; Dako), alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; ab5694-100; Abcam), γH2AX (05-636; Millipore), TRF1 (TRF12-S; Alpha Diagnostic) and Zscan4 (AB4340; Millipore). Then cells were washed three times (each for 15 min) with blocking solution, and incubated for 2 h with secondary antibodies at room temperature. Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) FITC (115-095-003; Jackson) and Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor® 594 (111-585-003; Jackson), diluted 1:200 with blocking solution, were used. Samples were washed, and counterstained with 0.5 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 (H1398; MP) in Vectashield mounting medium. Fluorescence was detected and imaged using a Zeiss Axio-Imager Z1 fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining of Pluripotency Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described.30 Cells growing on slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and were permeabilized by 0.5% Triton X‐100 (in DPBS) for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in DPBS for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with the primary antibodies against OCT4 (1:500, Santa Cruz, SC‐5279), NANOG (1:500, Cosmo Bio, RCAB001P), SSEA1 (1:100, Millipore, MAB4301) in BSA/DPBS buffer overnight at 4℃. The samples were washed three time in DPBS and incubated with fluorochrome conjugated secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti‐mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher, A21203), or Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti‐rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher, A21207) in BSA/DPBS buffer for 2 h at room temperature. The cells were washed three times in DPBS and DNA was labelled with DAPI (1 µg/ml, Merck Millipore) in DPBS. The stained cells were observed using an LSM 880 microscope (Zeiss) with a Plan Neofluar 63×/1.4 Oil DIC objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pluripotency Markers and Chromosome Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alkaline phosphatase activity and immunostaining were assayed as described previously [33 (link)]. The antibodies used were directed against: OCT4 (sx-5279; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), NANOG (AF1997; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), SOX2 (AB5603; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), SSEA-1 (MAB4301; Millipore), and SSEA-4 (MAB4304; Millipore). The fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies A11034 and A11029 were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Nuclei were detected with 0.5 μg/mL of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, D3571; Invitrogen) for 1 h. Metaphase mitotic chromosomes were prepared using a conventional air-drying technique. GTG staining (G-banding) was performed as described elsewhere [38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation of Undifferentiated Pig ESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before RNA and DNA extraction from pig ESCs, SSEA1-positive undifferentiated pig ESCs were sorted using a magnetic activated cell sorting Cell Separation System (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) to remove differentiated cells and feeder cells. The dissociated pig ESCs were reacted with an anti-SSEA1 antibody (1:200; MAB4301, Millipore) and anti-mouse immunoglobulin M microbeads (1:5; Miltenyi Biotec). SSEA1-positive cells were sorted on an LS column (capacity, 1 × 108 magnetically labeled cells; Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The identity of the sorted SSEA1-positive cells as undifferentiated pig ESCs was verified by immunostaining and genotyping (Figure S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterizing Pluripotency in Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry was used to detect OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, SSEA1, and TRA1 81 in two different passage windows for the three lineages: p16, p15, and p9 for C1, C2, and C3, respectively, and again after p20 (p23, p22, and p22, respectively). The cultured putative piPSCs were fixed in paraformaldehyde for 10 min and washed in PBS. The pluripotency-related markers test was performed as previously described[36 ]. Briefly, the antibodies were used to detect OCT4 (1:100, cat# SC8628, Santa Cruz), SOX2 (1:500, cat# ab97959; Abcam), NANOG (1:100, cat# ab77095, Abcam), SSEA1 (1:50, cat# MAB4301, Millipore) and TRA1 81 (1:50, cat# MAB4381, Millipore), and the respective secondary antibodies were used (donkey anti-goat 594, cat# A11058, donkey anti-rabbit 488, A21206, 1:500, donkey anti-goat 488, cat# A11055, Invitrogen, 1:500 goat anti-mouse 594, cat# A21044, Invitrogen). When necessary, the cells underwent permeabilization and blocking following previously described methods[37 (link)]. At the end of each protocol, the cell nuclei were labelled with Hoechst 33342 (1:1000) and analysed using the EVOS™ photodocumentation system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Pluripotent Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AP activity was detected using an Alkaline Phosphatase Substrate Kit III (Vector, sk-5300), according to the instruction manual. AP-positive colonies under different conditions were counted and analysed by StatView software.
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described [30] (link). Cells were washed in PBS, fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde, permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X-100, blocked with blocking solution, and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies Oct4 (1∶200, sc9081, Santa Cruz), Nanog (1∶200, AB80892, Abcam), or SSEA-1 (1∶200, MAB4301, Millipore). After wash with PBS for three times, cells were incubated with a secondary antibody (1∶200, Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 594 111-585-003 Jackson 1.5 mg or Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) FITC 115-095-003 Jackson 2 mg). Nuclei were stained using Vectashield medium (Vector) added with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma). Fluorescence images were captured using a Zeiss fluorescence microscope (AxionVision Z1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Derivation and Characterization of HO-1 Knockout Mouse ESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two HO-1–/– mouse ESC lines were derived and established from 3.5 days postcoitum blastocysts obtained through intercrossing of HO-1 mice [9] (link), [37] (link) using a highly efficient method [40] (link) at the Animal Technology Institute Taiwan. Genotypes of ESC lines were determined by PCR [41] (link) using ESC DNA samples. Karyotypes were determined at the Department of Genomic Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital (Taiwan). To further characterize HO-1–/– ESCs, total proteins were prepared and Western blotting performed to detect HO-1 and HO-2 expressions. To determine growth rate, ESC doubling time was measured as described [37] (link). To examine pluripotency, alkaline phosphatase activity staining was performed with the alkaline phosphatase detection kit (Millipore). To evaluate ESC marker gene expressions, immunofluorescence staining for Oct4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-9081) and SSEA-1 (Millipore, MAB4301) was performed and nuclei counterstained with DAPI (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Assay for Pluripotency Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.8% Triton X-100 for 10 min. Then, the cells were incubated with antibodies in 10% goat serum for 1h at room temperature. The primary antibody was incubated at 4 °C overnight and the secondary antibody was incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The DPBS was used to wash off the antibodies between each step. After incubation, the cells were screened and analyzed via flow cytometry (Cytoflex LX), according to the corresponding fluorescence intensity. The antibodies used in this experiment included anti-SSEA-1 (MAB4301, Sigma) and anti-SSEA-4 (MAB4304, Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!