The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using goat anti rabbit hrp conjugate

1

Western Blot Analysis of Apoptosis Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subconfluent cells were washed twice with ice-cold DPBS and lysed with lysis buffer (10mM Tris-HCl, 1% SDS) containing Halt Protease/Phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific Cat #78444). Cells were scraped and incubated on a rocker for 15 min at 4°C. Cells were further disrupted by pipetting 15 times and spun at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer at 280 nm.
The following antibodies were used: Cytochrome c Release Assay Kit (GeneTex Cat #GTX85531), TNF-α (NOVUS Cat #NB600-587), BID (NOVUS Cat #NB100-56106), Bcl-2 (Cell Signaling Cat #2876), Fas (Abcam Cat #15285), FasL (Abcam Cat #82419) and anti-β-actin (Sigma Cat #A2228). Goat-anti-mouse HRP conjugate and Goat-anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Cat #115035003 and 305035003) were used at 1:20,000 dilutions. Blots were developed using SuperSignal West Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce Cat #34095), imaged using the ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and quantitation performed using the ImageLab 3.0 software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FcRn and β-Actin Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 and THP1 cells were lysed for 5 min on ice with lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP‐40, 1 mM EDTA, and 5% glycerol (Pierce). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the cell supernatant was analyzed for FcRn and β‐actin protein expression by Western blotting using the following antibodies: anti‐human FcRn (1:20 dilution; Novus; NBP1‐89128), anti‐mouse β‐actin (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology; 13E5), goat anti‐mouse IgG HRP conjugate (1:5,000 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch), and goat anti‐rabbit HRP conjugate (1:5,000 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GPC3 Immunotoxin Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different immunotoxins (50 μl/well) were added to 96-well ELISA plates coated with 5 μg ml−1 of GPC3-hFc, and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Plates were then washed five times with PBST (0.5% Tween 20 in PBS) followed by incubation at room temperature for 1 hour with 50 μl of 1:200 dilution of rabbit anti-Pseudomonas exotoxin A exotoxin antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The plates were then washed five times with PBST followed by incubation at room temperature for 1 hour with 50 μl of goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugate at 1:5000 dilution (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). After washing three times with PBST, 50 μl/well of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine detection reagent (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) was added, and the plate was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. Substrate development was stopped by the addition of 0.1 N sulfuric acid. Absorbance was read at 450 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confluent cells were washed twice with ice-cold DPBS (Gibco) and lysed with lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1% SDS) containing HaltTM Protease/Phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific). Cells were scraped and incubated on a rocker for 15 min at 4 °C. Cells were further disrupted by pipetting 15 times and spun at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Protein concentration was determined by NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer at 280 nm. The following antibodies were used: fascin1 (GeneTex, GTX63842; 1:1000), fascin2 (NOVUS; Ab78599, 1:1000), BH3 interacting-domain death agonist (BID; NOVUS, NB100–56106, 1:1000), B-cell lymphoma 2 (bcl-2; Cell Signaling, 2876, 1:1000), cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP; Sigma, SAB4500487, 1:1000), α(E)-catenin (GeneTex, GTX 61621, 1:1000) and anti-β-actin (Sigma, A2228, 1:2500). Goat-anti-mouse HRP conjugate and goat-anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used at 1:20,000 dilutions. Blots were developed using SuperSignal West Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce), imaged using the ChemiDocTM imaging system (Bio-Rad), and quantitation performed using the ImageLab 3.0 software (Bio-Rad); single bands were seen with the western blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Western Blotting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hGCs and ovaries were gathered and dissolved in lysis buffer as previously discussed. Total protein was extracted and loaded on 10% gels. Then, the protein was separated by SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis), and the proteins were then electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF, Millipore, USA). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. Then, appropriate secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugates; Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, USA) were incubated separately with the membranes. After washing three times with Tris-buffered saline, a chemiluminescence kit was used to enhance specific signals (Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate, Thermo). Finally, the membrane was examined with an imaging detection system (Tanon, China), and ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA) was used to analyze immunoreactive bands. All experiments were repeated at least three times. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Information regarding the primary antibodies used for western blot analyses is listed in Supplementary Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Neural Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from differentiation days 14 and 30 were harvested and dissociated in a lysis buffer. Protein was extracted from each sample, which was then loaded on 10% gels and separated by SDS‐PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Next, the separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, Millipore, USA). Thirdly, the proteins were incubated with the primary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) of anti‐human‐NESTIN, anti‐human‐TUJ‐1, anti‐human‐tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), anti‐human‐MSI‐1, anti‐human‐Gapdh, anti‐human‐β‐tubulin, anti‐human ERα, anti‐human ERβ and appropriate secondary antibodies (goat anti‐rabbit HRP conjugates; Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) separately. The specific signals were detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western blotting Substrate; Thermo). Finally, the membrane was checked by a chemiluminescence detection system (Tanon, Shanghai, China) and the signal intensity of each band was analysed by Imaging J Software (National Institutes of Health, USA). Experiments were repeated three times, results are presented as fold change ±SD and P < 0.05 is determined significant difference (The assay of used antibodies are shown in Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Protein Analysis of hAMSCs and hAECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hAMSCs and hAECs from three pregnant women were harvested and dissociated in a lysis buffer. Protein was extracted from each sample, which was then loaded onto 10% gels and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Next, the separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF; Millipore, USA). Thirdly, the proteins were incubated with the primary antibodies (Abcam, USA) of anti-human-collagen I, II, III, IV, and VI, anti-human-telomerase reverse transcriptase, anti-human-OCT4, anti-human-NANOG, anti-human-Gapdh, anti-human-β-Tubulin, anti-human-SSEA4, or anti-human-TRA-1-81 and appropriate secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugates; Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) separately. The specific signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western blotting Substrate; Thermo). Finally, the membrane was checked by a chemiluminescence detection system (Tanon, China) and the signal intensity of each band was analyzed using Imaging J Software (National Institutes of Health, USA). Experiments were repeated three times, results are presented as fold change ± SD, and p < 0.05 is determined as significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Ovarian POI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hGCs from the POI patients, ovarian tissues from the POI mouse model, hGCs treated with PBS, exosomes, or hADSCs were harvested and dissociated in a lysis buffer. Protein was extracted from each sample, which was then loaded onto 10% gels and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Next, the separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF; Millipore, USA). The proteins were then incubated with the primary antibodies (Abcam, USA), namely, anti-human-SMAD2, anti-human-SMAD3, anti-human-SMAD4, anti-human-Fas, anti-human-FasL, anti-human-Caspase-3, anti-human-Caspase-8, anti-human-CD9, anti-human-CD63, anti-human-CD81, and anti-human-GAPDH, and subsequently incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugates; Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA). The specific signals were detected with enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western blotting Substrate; Thermo). Finally, the membrane was visualized with a chemiluminescence detection system (Tanon, China), and the signal intensity of each band was analyzed with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA). Experiments were repeated three times. The results are presented as the fold change ± SD. p < 0.05 is considered a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!