The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using massprep micro desalting column

1

Urine Protein LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine samples or protein from anion exchange fractions (concentrated, see below) were diluted in acetonitrile (5% (v/v)) and formic acid (0.1% (v/v)) in HPLC grade water. Protein (0.1 ng male samples, 1.6 ng female samples) was injected onto a C4 desalting trap (Waters MassPREP Micro desalting column, 2.1 × 5 mm, 20 µm particle size, 1000 Å pore size) (Waters, Manchester, UK) that was fitted on a Waters nano ACQUITY Ultra Performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system. The chromatography system was coupled to a Waters SYNAPT G2-Si QTOF mass spectrometer fitted with an electrospray source. Protein eluted over a 10 min acetonitrile gradient (5–95% (v/v)) at 40 µl min−1. Data were collected between m/z 500–3000. The data were processed using maximum entropy deconvolution (MAX ENT 1, Mass Lynx version 4.1, Waters) at 1 Da/channel over a mass range of 15 000–25 000 Da. The mass spectrometer was calibrated externally with horse heart myoglobin (250 fmol µl−1, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Protein Cage Masses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The subunit masses of AaLS-OT-2, AaLS-OT-1, and wt AaLS protein cages were analyzed using an electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass (ESI-TOF) mass spectrometer (Xevo G2 TOF, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) interfaced to a Waters UPLC and an autosampler. Samples were loaded onto the MassPREP Micro desalting column (Waters) and eluted with a gradient of 5-95% (v/v) acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid with a flow rate of 300 µL/min [11 ]. Mass spectra were acquired in the range of m/z 500-3,000 and processed using MaxEnt 1 and MaxEnt 3 from MassLynx version 4.1 to obtain the average mass from multiple charge state distributions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ESI-TOF Analysis of Encapsulin Cages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ESI-TOF analysis, encapsulin protein cages were loaded onto the MassPREP Micro-desalting column (Waters) and eluted with a gradient of 5-95% (v/v) acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 500 μL/min. The molecular masses of each species can be determined from the charges and the observed mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio values. Mass spectra were acquired in the range of m/z 500-3000 and deconvoluted using MaxEnt1 from MassLynx version 4.1 to obtain the average mass from multiple charge state distributions [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 μg of protein was loaded onto a MassPREP micro desalting column (Waters) and washed for 5 min with 10% (vol/vol) acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid. Following a 1-min gradient to 85% (vol/vol) acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid, the protein was eluted into a Xevo G2-XS QToF (Waters) using electrospray ionization for molecular mass measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Forming Aurora A Complexes with CoA/dpCoA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate CoA or dPCoA complexes with Aurora A, 10 μM WT Aurora A was incubated with 100 μM CoA or dpCoA for 15 min at room temperature. To evaluate the interaction, intact complexes were desalted using a C4 desalting trap (Waters MassPREP™ Micro desalting column, 2.1 × 5 mm, 20 μm particle size, 1000 Å pore size). Aurora A was eluted with 50 % (v/v) MeCN, 0.1 % (v/v) formic acid. Intact mass analysis was performed using a Waters nano ACQUITY Ultra Performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system coupled to a Waters SYNAPT G2, as described [60 ]. Samples were eluted from a C4 trap column at a flow rate of 10 μL/min using three repeated 0–100 % acetonitrile gradients. Data was collected between 400 and 3500 m/z and processed using MaxEnt1 (maximum entropy software, Waters Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Urine Protein Analysis by LCMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine samples were diluted in formic acid (0.1% (v/v) in HPLC grade water) to a protein concentration of approximately 5 pmol/μl. The samples were injected onto a C4 desalting trap (Waters MassPREP™ Micro desalting column, 2.1 × 5 mm, 20 μm particle size, 1000 Å pore size) (Waters, Manchester, UK) that was fitted on a Waters nano ACQUITY Ultra Performance liquid chromatography® (UPLC®) system. The chromatography system was coupled to a Waters SYNAPT™ G1 QTof mass spectrometer fitted with an electrospray source. Protein was eluted over a 10 min acetonitrile (ACN) gradient (5–95% (v/v)) at 40 μl/min. Data were collected between 500–3500 m/z. The data were processed using maximum entropy deconvolution (MAX ENT 1, Mass Lynx version 4.1, Waters) at 0.5 Da/channel over a mass range of 8500–10000 Da. The mass spectrometer was calibrated externally with horse heart myoglobin (1 pmol/μl, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein samples were diluted with 20mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5) at about 1 mg/ml. Mass spectrometry experiments were performed on a Xevo Q-TOFTM system (Waters, UK), equipped with a standard electrospray z-spray source. Each sample was analyzed using a MassPrep Micro Desalting Column (Waters, UK) with UPLC (Waters, UK) and on-line QTOF mass spectrometer, Xevo Q-TOF (Waters, UK) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The capillary voltage was adjusted to 2,700 V, the cone voltage was 40 V, and the source and the desolvation temperature were maintained at 100°C and 200°C, respectively. The instrument was calibrated with NaI before acquisition. The mass spectra obtained in experiments were processed with a Maximum Entropy program (MaxEnt) to deconvolute multiply charged ESI data. The average mass of protein materials was calculated from multiply charged peaks in the Q-TOFTM system. Each multiply charged peak was converted to a mass without positive adducts and then seven converted values were averaged without weighting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ESI-MS Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Positive ion electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra were acquired on a Waters Synapt G1 quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer equipped with a megaflow ion source. The ion source settings were: capillary voltage 3.5 kV, sampling cone voltage 26 V, extraction cone 2.6 V, ion source block temperature 70°C, desolvation gas (N2) flow 500 L/h (150°C). The instrument was calibrated using apomyoglobin. Mass spectra were acquired for the mass range m/z 300–2000 with a detector (MCP) voltage of 1700 V to increase the signal-to-noise ratio for multiply charged ions. MS spectra were processed using Masslynx software (v. 4.1) and spectrum deconvolution was carried out with the maximum entropy algorithm (MaxEnt 1) included in this software. The protein samples were desalted by reversed-phase chromatography using a Waters MassPREP Micro Desalting Column. Gradient and desalting flows were provided by a Waters nanoACQUITY UPLC pump and a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC pump. Desalting was carried out with 0.23% formic acid (v/v) (Solvent A). Elution from the colum was carried out with a short acetonitrile gradient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Resolution LC-MS/MS Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The
LC–MS/MS system was comprised of a Waters Acquity UPLC H-Class
Bio System with an MS/MS detector. A Waters Vion IMS Qtof instrument
was operated in positive ion/sensitivity mode at an m/z range of 400–4000. The capillary voltage
was set at 3 kV and the cone voltage was 150 V with a source temperature
of 120 °C and a deconvolution temperature of 300 °C. Instrument
control, data processing, and deconvolution were performed using Waters
UNIFI software v. 1.9.4.053 with an advanced maximum entropy (MaxEnt)-based
procedure. The samples were analyzed on a Waters MassPREP Micro Desalting
Column (1000 Å, 20 μm, 2.1 × 5 mm) at 80 °C with
a gradient of 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile (Figures S6–S11).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!