All data are reported in the form: mean ± standard deviation. The Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance of observed differences between experimental groups, where p < 0.05 is used to determine significance. Statistical analysis was carried out in GraphPad Prism v8 and IBM SPSS v23.0.
Prism v 8
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
Prism V.8 is a highly versatile and advanced laboratory equipment designed for scientific research and analysis. It is a high-performance instrument that combines accurate spectroscopic measurements with efficient data processing capabilities. The core function of Prism V.8 is to provide precise and reliable spectral analysis of various samples, enabling researchers and scientists to gain valuable insights into the composition and properties of their subjects.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
Spss v19, by IBM (5 mentions)
Spss v25, by IBM (4 mentions)
Spss v22, by IBM (3 mentions)
Spss statistics 23, by IBM (3 mentions)
Spss v23, by IBM (1 mentions)
Spss statistics for windows v20, by IBM (1 mentions)
Spss 26, by IBM (1 mentions)
Spss statistics v21, by IBM (1 mentions)
Spss statistics v26, by IBM (1 mentions)
Spss software v 21, by IBM (1 mentions)
Spss v27, by IBM (1 mentions)
31 protocols using prism v 8
1
Quantifying Metabolic Profiles in Obesity
2
Statistical Analysis of Behavioral Experiments
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v.8 or IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows v.20. In all figures, results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. In most experiments, results were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to the saline/control group, followed by a post hoc Dunnett test. Analgesic reversal of formalin, CYP, and LPS depressed hanging behavior were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA to the noxious stimulus group, followed by a post hoc Dunnett test. Two-tailed t-tests or two-way ANOVA were used as appropriate. Group differences at the level of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3
Comparative Analysis of Experimental Treatments
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data was reported as mean values and P values were from independent sample t-tests, with values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Distribution of data was assessed using Levene’s test for equality of variance. All reported P values are two-sided. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY) and Prism v8.
4
Clinicopathological Factors Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The collected parameters were statistically analysed using Graph Pad Prism v8 and IBM SPSS v25 software. We used the χ 2 test to compare the two grading systems with the other clinicopathological factors. The resulting p-value was considered of statistical significance if it was lower than 0.05 (Table I). Spearman's correlation coefficient (Rs) was used to highlight the associations between the analysed parameters.
5
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
GraphPad Prism v8.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA) and SPSS v22.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Researchers who performed statistical analysis were blinded to treatments. Differences between two groups were analyzed by a Student's t-test. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction were performed for comparisons between multiple groups. p < 0.05 reflected statistical significance.
6
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
GraphPad Prism v8.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA) and SPSS v22.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Differences between two groups were analyzed by Student's t-test. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's tests was performed for comparisons between multiple groups. P < 0.05 showed statistical signi cance.
7
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
GraphPad Prism (v. 8.0) and IBM SPSS 26.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) were used for statistical analysis. Data are expressed as mean (X) ± standard deviation (S) for variables with normal distribution. Differences among three or more groups of data were compared using analysis of variance. The Mann-Whitney and independent samples t-tests were used to compare differences between two groups. Differences with P< 0.05 were considered significant.
8
Variant Allele Frequency Comparison
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
For comparison of VAFs in DNA isolated from recently prepared and archival FFPE tissue blocks and blood, we used the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. We used Grubb’s criterion to determine whether the T790M VAF observed for patients was significantly higher as compared to storage time-matched FFPE control samples. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v 8.0. and IBM SPSS Statistics 23. p-values <0.05 were considered significant.
9
Comparative Analysis of Cell Responses
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data from experiments were analyzed with Origin 2019. Statistical analysis was performed with statistical software (GraphPad Prism v8.0 and IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0). Two-tailed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used for comparisons among multiple groups. Independent sample t-test (two-sided test) was used for comparison between the two groups (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns: no significance).
10
Statistical Analysis Methods for Biological Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
GraphPad Prism v8.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics 23 were used for data analysis. Statistically significant difference was determined by two-tailed Student’s t test for two groups or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test or Dunnett’s post-hoc test for three or more groups. Survival curves were compared with the Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!