The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Horseradish peroxidase hrp conjugated secondary antibody

Manufactured by Gene Tech
Sourced in China

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody is a laboratory reagent used for detection and quantification of target proteins in various immunoassays and immunohistochemistry techniques. It consists of a secondary antibody chemically linked to the enzyme horseradish peroxidase. The HRP enzyme can catalyze a colorimetric reaction, enabling the visualization and quantification of the target protein.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using horseradish peroxidase hrp conjugated secondary antibody

1

Paraffin-embedded Tissue Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized at 60°C for 20 min, cleared in xylene, and subjected to a graded series of alcohol. For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, slides were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich), blued in 0.1% sodium bicarbonate, and counterstained with Eosin Y solution (Sigma-Aldrich). For IHC, the slides were heated with saline sodium citrate (SSC) buffer at 95° to 100°C. After cooling, the slides were blocked with blocking solution (2% goat serum, 2% bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS) at room temperature and incubated with a primary antibody diluted in blocking solution at 4°C. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3% H2O2. Slides were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated secondary antibody (GeneTech) at room temperature, developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate (GeneTech), counterstained and blued with hematoxylin, and dehydrated with a graded series of alcohol. The positive staining density was measured using a computerized imaging system composed of a Leica CCD camera DFC420 connected to a Leica DM IRE2 microscope (Leica Microsystems Imaging Solutions Ltd.). The H-score scoring system was used, which evaluated staining intensity (0 to 3) and the percentage of positively stained cells (0 to 1), with a final score ranging from 0 to 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Paraffin-embedded Tissue Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized at 60 °C for 20 min, cleared in xylene and subjected to a series of graded alcohols. For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, slides were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1% sodium bicarbonate and were counterstained with Eosin Y solution (Sigma-Aldrich). For IHC, slides were heated with saline-sodium citrate (SSC) buffer at 95–100 °C. After cooling, the slides were blocked with blocking solution (2% goat serum, 2% BSA, and 0.05% Tween in PBS) at room temperature and were incubated with a primary antibody diluted in blocking solution at 4 °C. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3% H2O2. Slides were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (GeneTech) at room temperature, developed with a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (GeneTech), counterstained with hematoxylin, and dehydrated with a series of graded alcohols. The positive-staining density was measured by a computerized imaging system composed of a Leica charge-coupled device (CCD) DFC420 camera connected to a Leica DM IRE2 microscope (Leica Microsystems Imaging Solutions Ltd). The H-score system was utilized, which evaluated staining intensity (0 to 3) and the percentage of positively stained cells (0 to 100), with a final score ranging from 0 to 300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of IL-18, Ki-67, and Cleaved Caspase-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed as previously described [13 (link)]. Immunostaining was conducted using the primary antibodies against IL-18 (1 : 200, Cell Signaling Technology (CST)), Ki-67 (1 : 400, CST), and cleaved caspase-3 (1 : 400, CST). Then, the tissue sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated secondary antibody (GeneTech, Shanghai, China). For IL-18 and cleaved caspase-3, the staining intensity (SI) was scored as zero (negative), one (weak), two (moderate), or three (strong) and the staining extent (SE) was scored as zero (0%), one (1%–25%), two (26%–50%), three (51%–75%), or four (76%–100%). The overall staining score (OSC) was calculated by the product of the SI score and SE score. According to the OSC, specimens were divided into different groups as follows: the negative expression (0–4), weak expression (5–8), and strong expression (9–12) groups. For Ki-67, patients were also grouped by different expression: the low-expression group (nuclear staining tumor cells < 46%) and high-expression group (nuclear staining tumor cells ≥ 46%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of HSC70 in Renal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resected renal cancer specimens were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Cancer tissue samples, which were sliced into 5-μm‒thick sections and placed on glass slides treated with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, were deparaffinized and rehydrated. After that, they were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary antibody against HSC70 (1:50) purchased from Abcam (ab51052). After washing, cells probed with the primary HSC70 antibody were detected by incubating with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody at 37 °C for 45 min (purchased from Gene Tech, Shanghai), and then with DAB (DAB kit; purchased from Gene Tech, Shanghai). The primary antibody was substituted with phosphate-buffered saline in the negative control. Immunohistochemical signals were evaluated independently by two pathologists.
The expression of HSC70 was semi-quantitatively classified according to the following criteria: a score of 0 if <1% of cancer cells expressed nuclear and/or cytoplasmic HSC70; 1+ if ≥1% and <5% of cancer cells expressed nuclear and/or cytoplasmic HSC70; 2+ if ≥5% and <10% of morphologically unequivocal cancer cells expressed nuclear and/or cytoplasmic HSC70; and 3+ if ≥10% were positive cells; 2+ and 3+ were considered HSC70-positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histopathological Analysis of Intestinal Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fixation in 10% formalin, the intestinal tissues were embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 3 μm slices. The slices were then dehydrated with gradient alcohol, cleaned with xylene, and sealed with resin. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on the slices. Finally, images were captured using a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) to detect histopathological changes. The severity of intestinal injury was assessed according to Chiu’s scoring system, as previously described [9 (link)].
For immunohistochemistry (IHC), tissue slices were treated with anti-Fas antibody (1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology). The horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Gene Tech, Shanghai, China) was incubated for 30 min at room temperature and used to detect the primary antibody. The images were acquired using a light microscope (Nikon), and Fas staining was quantified using Image-Pro Plus 7 (Media Cybernetics, MD, USA).
Apoptotic cells in the intestinal epithelium sections were detected using TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) reagent (Elabscience, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems), and TUNEL-positive cells were quantified using Image-Pro Plus 7 (Media Cybernetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!