The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata version 14

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States, Denmark, Austria, United Kingdom, Japan, Canada

Stata version 14 is a software package for data analysis, statistical modeling, and graphics. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. Stata version 14 includes a wide range of statistical techniques, including linear regression, logistic regression, time series analysis, and more. The software is designed to be user-friendly and offers a variety of data visualization options.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 134 protocols using stata version 14

1

Prevalence of HR-HPV Genotypes in Cervical Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prevalence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial exact methods. A p-value of 0.05 and less was considered to be statistically significant. We compared prevalence of HR-HPV genotypes according to cervical lesions using a Fisher’s exact test and p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Analysis was performed using STATA version 14.2 (College Station, Texas) using a Fisher’s exact test and p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Analysis was performed using STATA version 14.2 (College Station, Texas).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Frequency of Testicular Lesions in Men

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our study and meta-analysis we calculated the frequency of a precursor lesion as the proportion of testes with a positive finding of all evaluated testes. We estimated that our study would need ! 50 patients to detect whether the frequency of ITSE and ITEC differed significantly from the frequency of MGCT. We used c 2 tests as we compared the frequency of lesions in 2 groups of patients. We used the metaprop program and STATA version 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) as we summarized the frequency of lesions in the studies. However, the recent version of metaprop excludes studies with a minimal or maximal rate when it summarizes the studies. We considered a P value of .05 as statistically significant. One of the authors (F.E.v.E.) undertook descriptive and analytic evaluations using STATA version 14.2 (StataCorp). As of July 10, 2013, the regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics in Southern Denmark approved the study and its use of archived human tissues (ID 20130077). The committee also approved that the participants in the study did not have to permit the present reuse of the testicular specimens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Meta-analysis with Publication Bias

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using STATA Version 14.0[11 (link)]. Additionally, publication bias and a meta-regression analysis were conducted using STATA Version 14.0. If there was an obvious heterogeneity among the studies (I2 > 50%), the random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Factors Associated with Hepatic Encephalopathy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparisons between two groups were performed by Mann–Whitney U test or t test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD tests was performed among group's comparisons. For univariate analyses, each variable was introduced into logistic regression analysis first. Then those factors showing a clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.05) association to the occurrence of HE were selected. The final models were fitted by STATA (version 14.0) conditional multivariate logistic regression in a step-wise forward method (Likelihood Ratio). For analyzing the risk factors of HE hospital death, STATA (version 14.0) multivariate logistic regression in a step-wise forward method was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Apremilast and Metabolic Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using Stata version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Continuous data were presented as mean and s.d. and categorical data as number and percentage. Continuous variables were checked for normality by visual inspection of histograms. Data were compared pre- and post-apremilast at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes in response to PDE4 inhibition were analysed using repeated measures mixed models. The total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose, insulin and GLP-1 response during the OGTT was calculated in Stata version 14 (StataCorp) using the pksumm and pkcollapse functions. Correlation between weight change and disease activity outcomes and weight change with fasting glycaemic and insulin parameters were assessed by Pearson correlation. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare weight change with achievement of MDA. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Adherence to Emergency Obstetric Care

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data collected on adherence were coded and entered into Stata version 14. A score of 1 was allotted to “yes” when the content of the signal function was performed and 0 to “no” when it was not done. A score of 1 was allotted to “yes” when the correct dose was given, 0 to “no” when the dose was not correct, 1 to “yes” when the frequency was correct, and 0 to “no” when the frequency was not correct and 1 to “yes” when the duration was correct and 0 to “no” when the duration was not correct. The correct scores for the EmONC signal function for each obstetric complication were expressed as a composite score and brought to 100%. The extent of adherence in EmONC signal function was measured in percentage (%). Adherence scores below 70% were regarded as low adherence, while scores ranging from 70% to 100% were regarded as high adherence. The 70% threshold was based on the evidence of 70% noncompliance to practice guidelines in various disciplines, across countries (Barth et al., 2016 (link)). Data analysis was done using Stata version 14. Both descriptive statistics, such as frequency and percentage, and inferential statistics, such as chi-square, were done with the significance level set as p < .05.
The Strengthening the Report of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist for cross-sectional studies was used (Network Group Equator, 2021 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Practitioners' Standard Practices and Determinants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was done in STATA version 14 College Station, Texas. Participants’ characteristics were described using proportions for categorical variables and continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations for normally distributed ones or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for skewed variables.
We computed the proportion of practitioners with standard practices. Generalized linear models with log Poisson link was used to analyze the relationship between practitioners’ practices and the independent variables. At bivariate analysis factors with a p-value of less than 0.2 were taken to multivariate analysis. To improve the precision of estimates, the data was declared as survey data and the analysis done through survey data analysis window of STATA version 14 College Station, Texas and clustered robust standard errors were used to cater for clustering in the level of qualifications of participants. Variables were considered to have a significant association if their p< 0.05. Interaction was assessed first using chunk test and then by manual dropping of interaction terms basing on their significance in the model. Confounding was assessed by comparing prevalence ratios in adjusted and unadjusted models and a variable was considered a confounder if it produced a difference of 10% or above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Attitudes of Mental Health Providers Toward Tele-psychiatry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered into Epi Data version 3.1 and exported to the Stata version 14 software for further analysis. Missing values, outliers, and other inconsistencies were avoided after organizing and exporting data into Stata version 14, and cleaning was done to avoid missing values, outliers, and other discrepancies. Frequency, sorting, and a list were used to clean up the data. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means, and proportions were computed and visualized using tables, graphs, and diagrams to describe the data.
To identify factors associated with the attitude of mental healthcare providers toward Tele-psychiatry services, ordinal logistic regression was a reasonable approach to use our data given that all the dependent variables are ordered categorically [33 (link)]. However, it’s founded that the proportional odds assumption was violated for all three categories of dependent variables in the preliminary analysis. Therefore, multinomial logistic regression analysis was utilized. Variables were declared statistically and significantly associated with dependent variables at p < 0.05. Moreover, the strength of association between factors and the dependent variables was determined using an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Meta-Analysis Methodology Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data entered into Microsoft Excel were exported to Stata version 14 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) for the analysis [23 (link)]. The common OR were estimated using inverse variance and random-effects model for each included study. Furthermore, the heterogeneity index was determined using Cochran’s Q and I squared statistics. I squared values less than 25%, 25–50%, and greater than 50% were defined as low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively [23 (link)]. The publication bias was examined by the Egger test. A sensitivity analysis was performed using Stata version 14 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) to identify the possible effect of each study on the overall results by removing each study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bleeding Risk Factors in Hematology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. The number of bleeding events was expressed as percentage and incidence rate, calculated as the number of events per 100 patient-years of observation. Differences between groups were assessed using the χ2 test with Yates’ correction for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. The data were analyzed with the use of Prism software (Version 8.4.0, GraphPad Software Incorporated, San Diego, CA, USA), and Stata, version 14 statistical software package (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) was used for data processing. Cox regression analysis was performed by entering individual variables considered as RF for bleeding events: female sex, age (⩾75 versus <75 years), renal failure (<60 versus ⩾60 ml/min), active cancer, hypertension, previous bleeding events, alcohol consumption, antiplatelet drugs, hemoglobin level reduction (⩽10 versus >10 g/dl), platelet count reduction (<100 × 103versus ⩾100 × 103 µl). The SPSS software for Windows, version 22 (SPSS Inc., College Station, TX, USA) and Stata, version 14 statistical software package (Stata Corp.) were used for data processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!