The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

46 protocols using phosphoimager

1

Quantification of miRNA Expression by Northern Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was isolated from the cells using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and integrity were analyzed using a NanoDrop ND 2000 instrument (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) and an Agilent 2100 instrument (Agilent small RNA kit, catalogue no. 5067-1548, Beutelsbach, Germany) as described before [42 (link)]. Northern blotting was carried out as described before [34 (link)]. Briefly, 5–10 µg total RNA was separated on a 12% Urea Acrylamide Gel (National Diagnostics, Beutelsbach, Germany). RNA was then transferred to a nylon membrane and chemically cross-linked using EDC. For the detection of miRNA-specific RNA, complementary oligomer probes for miR-142-3p: GAGACAGGTCCATAAAGTAGGAAACACTACA and -5p: GAGACAGGAGTAGTGCTTTCTACTTTATG [16 (link)] were radiolabelled using the mirVana kit (Life technologies). The underlined sequences represent the T7 anchor sequence. Hybridization was carried out at 55 °C overnight. After washing, blots were exposed to a storage Phosphorscreen for 24 h and visualized using a PhosphoImager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Freiburg, Germany). Blots were also analyzed for the expression of miR-21 and U6 RNA as a loading control using appropriate probes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

D-loop Formation by RAD51 and POLQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
D-loop formation assays were performed using xRAD51 and conducted as previously described37 . Briefly, nucleofilaments were first formed by incubating RAD51 (1 μM) with end-labeled 90-mer ssDNA (3 μM nt) at 37 °C for 10 minutes in reaction buffer containing 20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.4], 1 mM ATP, 1 mM Mg(Cl)2, 1 mM DTT, BSA (100 μg/mL), 20 mM phosphocreatine and creatine phosphokinase (20 μg/mL). After the 10 minutes incubation increasing amounts of POLQ (0, 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 μM) and RPA (200 nM) were added and incubated for an additional 15 minutes at 37°C. Reaction was then supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2 followed by further incubation at 37°C for 15 minutes. D-loop formation was initiated by the addition of supercoiled dsDNA (pBS-KS (-), 79 μM bp) and incubation at 37°C for 15 minutes. D-loops were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 0.9% agarose gel after deproteinization. Gel was dried and exposed to a PhosphoImager (GE Healthcare) screen for quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transient DNA replication assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transient DNA replication was performed by transfecting TR containing plasmid into HEK293L (52 (link)) cells followed by treating them with PhenDC3for 96 h. Briefly, 20 μg of TR plasmid (p8TR) was transfected with 15 μg of LANA expressing plasmid into HEK293L cells. These transfected cells were treated with 20 μM PhenDC3 or DMSO for 96 h. The DNA was extracted using modified Hirt's procedure described previously (13 (link)). A fraction (10%) of extracted DNA was digested with EcoRI to linearize the TR containing plasmid and rest (90%) was digested with EcoRI and DpnI to determine the replicated copies of the transfected plasmid. The digested DNA was loaded onto 0.8% agarose gel and resolved for 8 h at 100 V followed by Southern transfer and hybridization with 32P labeled TR specific probes. The blot was scanned using phosphoImager (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and the band densities were determined using Image Quant software (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Relative quantities of the DpnI resistant bands (replicated DNA) were determined using EcoRI digested bands as reference, which was 10% of total extracted DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and Northern Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from cell line pellets and human tumor biopsy samples using TRIreagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) or TRIzol (Life Technologies). Samples were DNase treated, further phenol-chloroform extracted and ethanol precipitated. Samples (typically 3 µg) were mixed (1:1) with Ambion gel loading solution and separated by 15% dPAGE in MOPS buffer and 7M urea. Ambion “decade” ssRNA size markers were used (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). Gels were ethidium bromide stained, blotted (by semidry electroblotting) and the RNA cross-linked to the membranes using EDC (1-ethyl-3-dimethylaminopropyl carbodimide) at 60 °C for 90 min as described [45 (link)]. Blots were prehybridized in 2x SSC, 7% SDS, 200 µg/mL ssDNA at 50 °C. RNA complementary oligomer probes were radiolabeled using the mirVana kit (Life technologies), or full length EBER1 using T7 transcribed from EBER1 template with 32P-UTP. Hybridization was at 50 °C overnight. Blots were washed in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50 °C and visualized using a phosphoimager GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Freiburg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying DNA-Protein Complex Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA in Ku or MRE11 complexes was measured as previously described (24 (link)). Briefly, 107 cells were treated with 1 Gy of IR or 56Fe, 37Si. Protein–DNA complexes in treated cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. Cells were resuspended with buffer A (50 mM Tris, pH 8.1, 1% SDS; and 10 mM EDTA), followed by sonication. The samples were immunoprecipitated using Ku70 or Mre11 antibody, respectively in buffer B (16.7 mM Tris,pH 8.1, 1% SDS; 1% Triton X-100; 1.2 mM EDTA; 167 mM NaCl). The immunoprecipitation complexes were washed one time with buffer C (20 mM Tris, pH8.1, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA and 150 mM NaCl), buffer D (500 mM NaCl) and buffer E (10 mM Tris, pH 8.1, 25% LiCl, 1% NP40, 1% deoxycholic acid and 1 mM EDTA), then two times with Tris–EDTA buffer (pH 8.0). DNA in Ku70–DNA or Mre11–DNA complexes was labeled with [γ-32P]ATP by incubation with T4 polynucleotide kinase in kinase buffer at 37°C for 45 min and then at 65°C for 10 min. The samples were then washed four times with TE buffer (pH 8.0) and incubated in TE buffer containing 1 mg/ml protease K (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C for 2 h. The samples were separated on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. DNA signals were detected and analyzed using a PhosphoImager with ImageQuant software (GE health, Waukesha, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying IFIT-RNA Binding Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA (cap 0, cap 1, and 5′-ppp) were radiolabeled with 32P-α-GTP using capping reaction kit (Cellscript) and purified by 12% urea-PAGE. Labeled RNAs (5 nM) were heated at 95°C for 5 minutes, annealed on ice, mixed with increasing concentrations of IFIT1, IFIT3, or IFIT1-IFIT3 complex in a 96-well plate and incubated for 15 min. Samples were applied to a 96-well dot blot apparatus (Whatman) with nitrocellulose and nylon membranes (Bio-Rad). The amounts of 32P-labeled RNAs present on nitrocellulose and nylon membranes were quantified by phosphoimager (GE Healthcare). Binding was calculated as the fraction of RNA bound to the nitrocellulose membrane compared to the sum of RNA bound to nitrocellulose and nylon membranes and plotted versus IFIT concentration using ORIGIN 7.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

2D Gel Analysis of Replication Intermediates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2D gel analysis of replication intermediates was carried out as described previously 59 (link). DNA was prepared and digested in agarose plugs with the indicated restriction enzymes 12 (link). Enriched fractions for replication intermediates were obtained using BND cellulose columns (SIGMA). Gels were blotted onto Hybond-N+ nylon membrane. The probes were labeled with alpha-32P dCTP and the blot analyzed on a PhosphoImager and quantified with the ImageQuant software (pause/ arc + pause in percentage) (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Sequences of primers used to produce the probe are indicated in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PLK-1 Kinase Assay with C. elegans PLK-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLK-1 kinase assays were performed in kinase buffer (50 mM Hepes pH
7.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT and protease and phosphatase
inhibitors (Roche)) with C. elegans PLK-1 in a final volume
of 15 μL containing either 300 ng N-terminal MBP-PAR-3 (aa
1–394) or MBP. Reactions were initiated by adding a mix of 0.2 mM
ATP and 5 μCi [γ-32P] ATP (Perkin
Elmer), during 40 minutes at 30°C. S amples were boiled in Laemmli
buffer 3X and visualised by Coomassie blue staining,
[γ-32P] ATP incorporation was
analysed with a phosphoimager (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Psoralen Cross-Linking of Genomic DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Psoralen cross-linking12 (link) was performed in isolated nuclei that were irradiated in the presence of 10 μg/ml 4,5,8’-trimethylpsoralen (Sigma–Aldrich). Genomic DNA was isolated and 10 μg was digested with SalI (Promega). Fragmented DNA was separated on a 0.9% agarose gel, transferred onto nylon membranes, and immobilized by UV irradiation at 1875 x 100 μJ/cm2 using a UV cross-linker (Stratalinker 2400; Agilent Technologies). The membrane was hybridized with 32P-labelled rDNA (generated using a nick translation labeling kit, Roche) and visualized on a PhosphoImager (GE Healthcare). Quantification was performed using ImageQuant (TLv2005.04; GE Healthcare). Original psoralen blot scans that correspond to quantitated and/or edited blot images shown in Figs 1, 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2 are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Fig. 8. A representative depiction of the psoralen blot quantitation is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1c, d.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying UPF1 Isoform Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from ∼1 × 106 cells using RNATri (Bio&Sell) and 0.5 μg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription with the UPF1 reverse primer (sequence given below). To detect the mRNA corresponding to the two isoforms of human UPF1, we designed primers specific to sequences in exons 7 and 8, which flank the alternative 5′-splice site and, upon amplification, would generate products of 166 and 133 bp for human UPF11 and UPF12 isoforms, respectively. The primer sequences are as follows: forward 5′-GGGACCTGGGCCTTAACAAGAAGAGA-3′ and reverse 5′-ATCCCTTTCCACAGGGGCGCAAGGT-3′. Plasmids expressing the human UPF11ΔCH and UPF12ΔCH proteins were used as positive controls. For quantification of mRNA levels of the two isoforms low-cycle PCRs were performed with the 32P-labeled forward primer (sequence given above), products were resolved by denaturing-PAGE and analyzed using a Phosphoimager and the ImageQuantTL software (GE Life Sciences). The mRNA preparations of different mouse tissues were analyzed as described above, using the human-specific forward primer (sequence given above, identical to the mouse sequence in this region) and the following mouse-specific reverse primer: 5′-ATCCCCTTCCACAGGGGCGCCAGAT-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!