The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

130 protocols using lovastatin

1

HPLC Quantification of Lovastatin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
lovastatin concentration was assayed by the HPLC method at the HPLC unit, the Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Extracts were dried and concentrated under reduced pressure. A HPLC system (E-Chrom Tech; Model LC 1620 Aliquid chromatograph) with UV detector was used for this assay. Ten µL of the sample was injected into the C-18: Shodex C-18-120-5 4E (250 × 4.6 mm) column using the mobile phase of an acetonitrile: 1.1% orthophosphoric acid (95:5; v/v) at a flow rate of 1.3 mL/min. With the use of PA Station 2015 ChemStation (version 2.0) software, lovastatin peaks at 238 nm were monitored in comparison to the standard lovastatin (Sigma-Aldrich), and the lovastatin concentration was calculated per gram of dry substrate (gds).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lovastatin Application on Tomato Stems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lovastatin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) dissolved in DMSO (stock solution: 0.124 M) and the final concentrations of 123.6μM was applied. 20μL Lovastatin was dripped on cutting surfaces of 10 tomato stems after decapitation with 1μL Tween-20. Another A Lovastatin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) stock solution at a concentration of 0.124 M was prepared by dissolving in DMSO and applied at a final concentration of 123.6 μM. A solution of 20 μL Lovastatin and 1 μL Tween-20 was applied on the cut surfaces of 10 tomato stems after decapitation. An additional equal number of tomato plants were treated with water as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lovastatin and MEK Inhibitor in Morris Water Maze

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lovastatin: The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor Lovastatin was purchased from Sigma, stored according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and freshly dissolved as previously described31 (link). The solution was administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection of 10 mg/kg (body weight) daily.
MEK inhibitor (PD0325901; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 25 mg/ml and resuspended in vehicle (0.5% hydroxypropyl methyl-cellulose with 0.2% Tween 80; Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 1 mg/ml as described by9 (link). The solution was administered by intraperitoneal injection (IP) of 2 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg (body weight) daily.
Lovastatin (10 mg/kg; SC), PD0325901 (2 mg/kg; IP), or vehicle (DMSO with 0.5% hydroxypropyl methyl-cellulose and 0.2% Tween 80) was injected once daily for 3 d prior to, and during, Morris water maze training 6 h prior to training. As described above, mice were trained in the hidden version of the MWM for 7 days (2 trials/day) after which the probe trial was given.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Potential of Lovastatin from A. terreus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial potential of lovastatin produced by A. terreus AUMC 15760, compared to the standard lovastatin (Sigma-Aldrich), was tested against three fungi (C. albicans AUMC 13415, C. glabrata AUMC 13412, and C. krusei AUMC 13420) and three strains of E. coli ATCC 8739, S. aureus ATCC 6538, and S. epidermidis ATCC 12228. Both drugs were used at concentrations of 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.62, and 0.31 mg/mL. Nystatin (50 mcg/disc) and Piperacillin/Tazobactam 10:1 (110 µg/disc) were used as antifungal and antibacterial reference drugs, respectively. The test organisms were grown in 24-h-old cultures, and spore suspensions (108 CFU/mL = 0.5 McFarland standard solution) were employed to inoculate Petri plates. Using sterile cotton swabs and a sterile Petri plate filled with either Sabouraud’s dextrose agar (SDA) for Candida species or nutritional agar (NA) for bacteria, the bacterial and fungal spore suspensions were evenly distributed. Using the well diffusion method [109 (link)], the five wells (5 mm-diameter holes cut in the agar gel) each received a 50 µL addition of the tested drug. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 ± 1 °C for bacteria and Candida under aerobic conditions. After incubation, the inhibition of bacterial and fungal growth was measured in mm. Tests were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statin Effects on Hamstring Tenocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of normal hamstring tendon were obtained from patients, average age 30 (19–45y), undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with informed consent and in full compliance with UK HTA and MREC requirements and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983. Tenocytes were derived by standard explant protocol (Torricelli et al., 2006). They were expanded in DMEM/F12 (Lonza, Cheltenham, UK) containing 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) (Biosera, Ringmer, UK) and maintained in DMEM/F12 5% FCS during statin treatment. Tenocytes were treated with 0.2–2 μM lovastatin (Sigma, Poole, UK) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma) for different times. Furthermore the cells were incubated in the presence of 0.08 and 0.8 μM atorvastatin (Sigma) and 0.048 and 0.48 μM simvastatin (Sigma). The latter was dissolved before treatment in NaOH in ethanol. To reverse lovastatin‐induced changes 100 μM mevalonate (Sigma) was added back. Vehicle controls included DMSO for lovastatin and atorvastatin, NaOH in ethanol for simvastatin and ethanol for mevalonate. Cells were used at passage 4 or below as it has been reported that tenocytes may dedifferentiate at higher passages (Yao et al., 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lovastatin Cultivation in Mycelial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To carry out the experiment, in vitro cultures of the abovementioned species were established on a modified liquid medium according to Oddoux [34] .
The mycelial cultures were derived from the previously prepared explants of the fruiting bodies of A. bisporus and L. edodes of commercial origin as well as from C. cibarius and I. badia collected from the natural environment. For this purpose, a part of the hymenium was first defatted with 70% ethanol for several seconds, and the material was sterilized with a 15% solution of sodium chlorate for 2 min. Then the fragments of fruiting bodies were rinsed several times with redistilled water and transferred to the Oddoux solid medium (laminar airflow). After 2 weeks of in vitro culture, 250 mL of the modified liquid medium (Oddoux) was transferred to the solid medium.
In the next stage of the experiment, mycelium from the in vitro cultures of L. edodes was transferred to 250 mL of the modified liquid medium containing 20 mg of lovastatin in the form of a chemical compound (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), weighed on the analytical scales, and in the form of tablets of Liprox and Lovasterol preparations containing 20 mg of lovastatin, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cholesterol Depletion and Repletion Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N2a cells and astrocytes were depleted of cholesterol by two alternative methods: MβCD treatment to extract cholesterol from the membrane and lovastatin to inhibit its synthesis. For MβCD (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA; cat#C4555) treatment, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 5 or 10 mM MβCD in serum free DMEM for 60 min at 37 °C. Cholesterol enrichment or repletion of cholesterol-depleted cells were obtained by incubation of the cells for 2 h at 37 °C using MβCD-cholesterol inclusion complexes (formed by mixing cholesterol suspension with cyclodextrin solution, as described [47 (link)]). To decrease cholesterol synthesis, we applied lovastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of HMH-CoA to the cholesterol precursor mevalonate. For studies with lovastatin, the cells were incubated 12 h with 1, 5, or 20 µM lovastatin (Sigma) in serum free DMEM at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lovastatin Pretreatment of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lovastatin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States) was dissolved in DMSO to prepare a stock solution of 6 mM. Cells were treated with different concentrations of Lovastatin for 4 h and then transduced with α-syn PFFs. Lovastatin was maintained in the medium. The cells were harvested 48 h after transfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Endothelial Dysfunction and Recovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endothelial dysfunction and recovery was evaluated via acute exposure to TNF-α59 (link). Endothelialized TEBVs were allowed to mature for 7 days. A 500 μL media sample was collected and frozen at −20 °C for NO analysis. TEBV vasoactivity was evaluated after 7 days using the phenylephrine-acetylcholine assay listed above. TNF-α was introduced to the flow circuit for 4.5 hours at a final concentration of 200 U/mL. TEBV vasoactivity was evaluated after 7 days using the phenylephrine-acetylcholine assay. Media was changed directly afterward to TEBV media with 2 mg/mL ε-aminocaproic acid. TEBV vasoactivity was assessed using the phenylephrine-acetylcholine assay three days and seven days later to evaluate endothelial recovery after removal of the TNF-α stimulus.
The effect of lovastatin toward mediating TEBV response toward TNF-α was evaluated by culturing endothelialized TEBVs made with hNDFs for 1 week. On Day 7, lovastatin (Sigma) was introduced into the flow circuit to produce a final concentration of 1 μM. Control TEBVs were evaluated without exposure to lovastatin. TEBVs were treated for 3 days, and then exposed to 200 U/mL TNF-α for 4.5 hours. TEBV vasoactivity was assessed using the phenylephrine-acetylcholine assay at Day 7, Day 10, and Day 10 after treatment with TNF-α.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Lovastatin Enhances Adventitious Bud Regeneration in Tomato

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A lovastatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) stock solution at a concentration of 0.124 M was prepared by dissolving in DMSO and applied at a final concentration of 123.6 μM. A solution of 20 μL lovastatin and 1 μL Tween-20 was applied on the cut surfaces of 10 tomato stems after decapitation. An additional equal number of tomato plants were treated with water as control. The number of regenerated adventitious buds was counted on 0, 30, 37, 44, 51 and 58 d after decapitation, respectively. We used ANOVA to test the difference between the treatment with and without lovastatin added.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!