The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fortus 250mc

Manufactured by Stratasys
Sourced in United States

The Fortus 250mc is a 3D printing system designed for industrial-grade additive manufacturing. It features a build volume of 254 x 254 x 254 mm and can produce parts using a variety of thermoplastic materials. The Fortus 250mc is equipped with a heated chamber to maintain optimal part quality and dimensional accuracy throughout the printing process.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using fortus 250mc

1

Fabrication of Silicone Skin Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Markers were casted out of silicone. A mold was 3D printed using a Fortus 250MC (Stratasys, Ltd.) printer with a rubber-like print material, Tango (Stratasys, Ltd.). This resulted in a flexible mold that allowed releasing the markers from the mold after curing. The resulting marker is a disk of 2 mm thick and 5 mm in diameter. Initially, a marker of 10 mm in diameter was produced and was only used on the first two patients. The marker’s material is Ecoflex™ GEL (Smooth-on Inc.) which is commercially available and tested skin safe that conform with the OECD TG 439 test guidelines which are closely related to the ISO 10993 standards for medical devices [15 (link)]. For this pilot study, we rely on these test results and patients were asked to report any adverse events. The two components of uncured silicone were mixed, stirred, and carefully poured into the mold. Any excess material was scraped off. The markers were left to cure for 4 h of which the first hour in a vacuum chamber at 100 mbar to extrude any trapped air. After curing, the markers were removed from the mold and stored on a plastic sheet for later application. The permanently sticky silicone allowed for long-term storage of the marker without changes to geometrical or acoustic properties.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

3D-Printed Mold for Wrinkled Collagen Gels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We developed a 3D‐printed mold and holder to create wrinkles in the dermal layer during the collagen gelation process (Figure 1). The 3D model of the mold and holder was designed using SolidWorks (Dassault Systems SolidWorks Corp., France) and manufactured using a 3D printer (Fortus 250mc, Stratasys Ltd., USA). We selected acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) as the printing material because of its biocompatibility. The holder was designed to mount the mold on the Snapwell insert, and the mold height could be adjusted by adjusting the relative position of the mold and the holder.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Triboelectric Sensor-Enabled Soft Actuator

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methodology for prototype development is presented in Figure 2. Regarding the sensor and actuator fabrication, first, the triboelectric sensor was patterned using 1 wt.% MWCNTs plus 1 wt.% of magnetite in PU. Then, the triboelectric sensor was placed inside the mould of the actuator and, finally, it was filled with PU rubber. The actuator’s mould consisted of a polymeric part produced by 3D printing. The structure also comprises two channels on the sides, where the string moves. The motion is comparable to the movement of a tendon, bending the structure after pulling the sting. The mould presents several folds on the front and back, facilitating the movement of the actuator and decreasing the force needed for the micro servo to pull the strings.
The mould and the prototype were designed with SolidWorks and fabricated using a 3D printing machine (Stratasys Fortus 250mc, Edina, MN, EUA). The hardware to control the prototype consisted of an Arduino Uno, electrical resistances, LEDs and two micro servo motors (DFRobot SER0006, Hubai, China). All the components were assembled inside the 3D printing prototype structure to test the prototype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phantom Placement for Multisite MRI Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BIRN phantom was chosen as the standard phantom for this trial because it is readily available and because its properties match those of brain tissue [13 (link)]. Five imaging sites (sites #11, #18, #21, #23, and #27 in Table 1) used their own BIRN phantoms for this trial. For the remaining 22 sites, phantoms were bought and shipped to each site before the site visit.
A procedure was developed to ensure consistent placement of the phantom. For Siemens scanners, standard phantom holders (part #10606579, no. 29 and part #7581700, no. 14) were used with dedicated adapter rings constructed with a 3D printer (Fortus 250mc, StrataSys, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA) (Fig. 1). The GE scanners have a standard ring holder on the head coil to hold the phantom in position (Fig. 1). To ensure consistent positioning, lines were drawn along the laser landmarks on each phantom during the site visit. The technologists were instructed to use these lines to ensure reproducible positioning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!