The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using sc 365692

1

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed twice with PBS containing CaCl2 and then lysed in a 100 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0 RIPA buffer supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma‐Aldrich). Protein expression was examined by Western blot using the anti‐ZEB1 (1/200, Sigma HPA027524, RRID:AB_1844977), anti‐ZEB2 (1/500, Sigma HPA003456, RRID:AB_10603840), anti‐MITF (clone C5, ab80651, 1/500, Abcam, RRID:AB_1603129), anti‐SOX10 (Santa Cruz, sc‐365692, RRID:AB_10844002) antibodies for primary detection. Loading was controlled using the anti‐GAPDH (1/20,000, Millipore) antibody. Horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated rabbit anti‐mouse, goat anti‐rabbit, and donkey anti‐goat polyclonal antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were used as secondary antibodies. Western blot detections were conducted using the Luminol reagent (Santa Cruz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence and in situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was embedded in paraffin as previously described (May et al., 2015 (link)). Immunofluorescence was performed either on paraffin-embedded tissue or on whole-mount dissected embryonic salivary glands and explant cultures (Gaete et al., 2015 (link)). Primary antibodies and dilutions were used as follows: anti-Sox9 1:300 (AB5535, Millipore); anti-BrdU 1:500 (ab6326, Abcam), anti-Sox2 1:200 (#2748, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-Mist1 1:50 (sc-98771, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), for which signal was amplified with the TSA kit (PerkinElmer); anti-laminin 1:300 (L9393, Sigma); anti-K5 1:300 (119-13621, Cambridge Bioscience); anti-Sox10 1:100 (sc-365692, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using the TSA kit; anti-cleaved caspase 3 1:200 (#9661, Cell Signaling Technology). In situ hybridisation was performed as previously described (Gaete et al., 2015 (link)). Plasmids for probe generation have been described previously: Spry1 (Minowada et al., 1999 (link)), Fgf10 (Bellusci et al., 1997 (link)), Myb (Matalová et al., 2011 (link)), Etv5 (Hippenmeyer et al., 2002 (link)) and Col2a1 (Ng et al., 1997 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol for IGSF3 and SOX10

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue sections were processed using the TSA kit (Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The deparaffinization of fixed tissues were performed by immersing the slides in tissue clear and rehydrated with graded ethanol (100–70%) and water. The heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer (1.8 mM citric acid, 8.2mM sodium citrate, pH 5.0). The slides were treated with 3% H2O2-MetOH for 10 min to inactivate endogenous peroxidase activity. The tissues were blocked for 30 min with TNB buffer (0.1M Tris–HCL (pH 7.5), 0.15M NaCl, 0.5% blocking reagent from TSA kit). The primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C and biotinylated secondary antibody for 60 min at room temperature. The primary antibodies include polyclonal rabbit IGSF3 (1:750 HPA036305, Sigma-Aldrich), polyclonal mouse SOX10 (1:500 SC-365692, Santa Cruz). The reddish brown color was the stain generated by secondary biotinylated antibodies which includes goat-anti rabbit IgG (E0432, Dako) and goat-anti mouse IgG (E0433, Dako). The washes were performed with TNT (Tris/NaCl/Tween 20) buffer. The Mayer’s hematoxylin (S3309, Dako) was used to counterstain the tissue sections. For tissue morphological assessment, hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed. Whole stained slides were digitally scanned using a slide scanner (3Dhistec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!