The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 20 spss statistics v20

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Version 20 (SPSS Statistics V20) is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, statistical modeling, and reporting. The core function of SPSS Version 20 is to enable users to analyze and interpret data, perform a variety of statistical tests, and generate reports and visualizations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using spss version 20 spss statistics v20

1

Amylase Level Comparison Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Independent sample t tests were used to examine group differences in average amylase levels. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Version 20 (SPSS Statistics V20, IBM Corporation, Somers, NY). The statistical significance level was set at a P value <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Predicting Intrauterine Gestational Milestones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age was presented as median (minimum, maximum). Other continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical data were displayed as number and percentage (%). Due to the measurement limitation of β-HCG, all data which were recorded as < 0.1 were transformed to 0.099 for analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and corresponding statistics were utilized for predicting iGM classification based on serum β-HCG level. Student’s t-test (independent and paired), Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, phi coefficient, and Chi-square test were used depending on the properties of the data. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 20 (SPSS Statistics V20, IBM Corporation, Somers, New York). A value of P < .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were repeated three times. The quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean in experiments with two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) tests were used as post hoc for comparisons in experiments with more than two groups. If the homogeneity hypothesis failed, Dunnett’s t3 test was used to analyze the significant differences between groups. Two-way ANOVA was used in the CCK-8 experiments. The significance level of all tests was set at P≤0.05. Statistical analysis was performed by using IBM SPSS Version 20 (SPSS Statistics V20; IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data were indicated with mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical data were reported as count and percentage (%). Student's independent t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to test the difference of means between 2 groups or among multiple groups (>2). Nonparametric tests including the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare means between groups for data normality was not assumed. Categorical data were tested with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (if any expected value ≤ 5 was found). The statistical significance level for all the tests was set at a p value < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 20 (SPSS Statistics V20, IBM Corporation, Somers, New York).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!