The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genome wide snp array 6

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 is a microarray-based platform for genome-wide genotyping and analysis. It features comprehensive genome coverage with over 906,600 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and more than 946,000 probes for the detection of copy number variation (CNV).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using genome wide snp array 6

1

Genotyping and Imputation of Caucasian Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples were genotyped using Affymetrix Genome Wide SNP Array 6.0 and analysed per manufactures instructions. We applied quality control (QC) filters to exclude unreliable samples, samples with cryptic relatedness and samples that were not genetically inferred Caucasian. After QC filtering, 313 individuals remained. All analyses were conducted using software package PLINK14 (link). For the analysis reported here, we eliminated SNPs with genotype call rate <95%, with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 15%, or if there was significant departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P<10−6). A total of 360,046 SNPs passed QC and were available for analysis. To improve cross study comparisons, genotype imputation was performed using the Minimac (v 2012.11.16) (ref. 27 (link)) program. Imputation results were filtered at an imputation quality threshold of 0.5 and a MAF threshold of 0.15.
PLINK14 (link) was used to infer LD block for the genotypes. Default setting of SNPs within 200 Kb was used to estimate it.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ovarian Cancer Transcriptome and Genomic Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mRNA sequencing data from 419 OC tissue samples were analyzed using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 RNA Sequencing platform. SNP and CNV data from 481 OC tissue samples were analyzed using an Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The datasets were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; cancergenome.nih.gov) database. After the barcodes of the samples in the datasets were matched, a total of 230 OC samples with platinum response status and survival time information were obtained. These samples included 69 platinum-resistant samples and 161 platinum-sensitive samples and were used as the training set. The GSE63885 dataset (17 (link)) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) database and analyzed using a GPL570 [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array platform. This dataset consisted of 101 OC tissue samples, including 75 samples with known platinum response status (34 resistant samples and 41 sensitive samples), and was used as the validation set. The clinical information of the patients from whom the samples in the training and validation sets were obtained are presented in Table I.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping Protocol for SNP Marker Selection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GRAS subjects were genotyped using semi-custom Axiom MyDesign Genotyping Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), based on a CEU (Caucasian residents of European ancestry from UT, USA) marker backbone, including 518 722 SNPs, plus custom marker-set of 102 537 SNPs. Genotyping was performed by Affymetrix on a GeneTitan platform with high quality (SNP call rate >97%, Fisher’s linear-discriminant, heterozygous cluster-strength offset, homozygote-ratio offset).23 (link), 44 (link), 45 (link) Markers were selected according to our SOP for PGAS23 (link) using following selection criteria: (1) SNPs in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; (2) SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF⩾0.2) allowing for statistical analyses; (3) SNPs not in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) with other selected SNPs (r2<0.8). Based hereon, only rs3802890-A/G remained for analysis.
SHIP-0 subjects were genotyped using Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array-6.0 (genotyping efficiency 98.6%). Imputation of genotypes was performed with software IMPUTE v0.5.046 (link) against 1000-Genomes (phase1v3) reference-panel using 869 224 genotyped SNPs.41 (link) Rs3802890 was imputed with IQ=1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genotyping for Insulin Sensitivity Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated and extracted from whole blood samples. Genotyping was conducted using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and custom genome-wide array of for insulin sensitivity, a dynamic measure of insulin-glucose dynamics the Broad Institute and imputed with 1000 Genomes phase 3 reference panel using the Michigan Imputation Server (Michigan Imputation Server ). Of the 475 participants with rs9527 genotype data, the minor allele frequency (T) was observed to be 0.15. Genotype was coded as a binary variable with 1 representing the presence of at least one minor T allele.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-throughput Targeted Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proband's DNA was collected, sequenced, and analyzed as part of a larger study developing a targeted multi‐disorder high‐throughput sequencing assay. The methods have been detailed previously (Delio et al. 2015). In brief, ~10 mL of whole blood was collected from the patient and genomic DNA was purified using the Puregene Genomic DNA Purification kit (Gentra, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Next, all coding, untranslated regions (UTR) and flanking intronic regions of 650 known disease‐associated genes were targeted. Within this panel there were 154 cardiac disease‐associated genes (listed in Table S1). Targeted capture‐sequencing was done using the Roche‐NimbleGen EZ SeqCapV3 capture system and sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2500 Rapid Run platform. Sequence reads were analyzed using a custom in‐house generated analytical pipeline (Delio et al. 2015). We sequenced eight controls and one HapMap sample to assess the precision of the panel in identifying known variants. Samples were analyzed for copy number variation using the Affymetrix Genome Wide SNP Array 6.0. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm mutations. All mutations discovered were subsequently validated in a CLIA‐approved commercial laboratory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genome-Wide Copy Number Profiling of Bladder Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA of 19 papillary bladder tumours (500 ng each) was investigated for chromosomal alterations and copy number changes with array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix, Munich/Germany) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Array chips were scanned with GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G. Hybridization was performed at the IZKF Z3 Core Unit Genomics of the Institute of Human Genetics in Erlangen. Data analysis was performed with Genotyping Console (Affymetrix). Tumour DNAs were compared with DNAs from 167 anonymous healthy controls, which were provided by the IZKF Z3 Core Unit Genomics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preeclampsia Genomic Study in Caucasians

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SOPHIA Caucasian cohort of 177 preeclampsia cases and 116 normotensive controls was recruited using electronic birth certificates from the Iowa Department of Public Health from 3078 primiparous women who gave birth in Iowa from August 2002 to May 2005, as previously described19 (link). Genotyping was performed using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix). Sample quality control and data analysis was performed, as previously described19 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Integrative Analysis of Genomic Alterations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
METABRIC and TCGA used Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP array 6.0 to derive somatic copy number variations (CNVs). METABRIC preprocessing identified somatic CNV segments in tumors using the HMM-Dosage method [63 (link)]. A similar patient-by-gene matrix was created with TCGA data using normalized circular binary segmentation [64 (link)] files for each patient. A mean log2 ratio per segment was assigned to each genic and intergenic region within the segment according to METABRIC annotation. METABRIC used the Illumina HT-12v3 platform in gene expression analysis. Pre-processing included spatial artifact correction, summarization, and normalization of log2 intensities with bead-array and BASH R packages [65 (link), 66 (link)]. In TCGA, normalized mRNA expression counts were derived from the TCGA Level 3 RNAseqV2 expression data. Illumina HiSeq 2000 was used to create the TCGA transcriptional data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!