The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using g6532

1

Western Blotting Protocol for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed following a previously published protocol (Miyakoshi et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, whole‐cell samples in 1× Laemmli sample buffer (Bio‐Rad) were separated on 10% or 12% TGX gels (Bio‐Rad). Proteins were transferred onto Hybond PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare), and membranes were blocked for 10 min in Bullet Blocking One buffer (Nacalai Tesque) and were incubated overnight at 4℃ with monoclonal anti‐FLAG (Sigma–Aldrich #F1804; 1:5,000), monoclonal anti‐GFP (Sigma–Aldrich SAB2702197; 1:5,000), and polyclonal anti‐GroEL (Sigma–Aldrich #G6532; 1:10,000) antibodies diluted in Bullet Blocking One buffer. Membranes were washed three times for 15 min in 1 × TBST buffer at RT. Then membranes were incubated for 1 hr at RT with secondary antimouse or antirabbit HRP‐linked antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology #7076 or #7074; 1:5,000) diluted in Bullet Blocking One buffer and were washed three times for 15 min in 1 × TBST buffer. Chemiluminescent signals were developed using Amersham ECL Prime reagents (GE Healthcare), visualized on LAS4000 (GE Healthcare), and quantified using Image Quant TL software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot for Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot was performed as described (3 (link),37 (link)). Briefly, 0.1 OD600 bacterial culture was collected by centrifugation for 2 min at 8000 rpm at 4°C, and resuspended in 100 μl 1× protein loading buffer. After heating for 5 min at 95°C, 0.02 OD600 of cell lysate was separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Proteins were transferred onto a NC membrane (#10600002, GE Healthcare) for 60 min at 100 V in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 190 mM glycine, 20% methanol, pH 8.3). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 1× TBST (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween20, pH 7.6) buffer with 5% (w/v) Difco™ skim milk (#6307915, BD). After blocking, membranes were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with monoclonal α-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich #F1804; 1:1000) or polyclonal α-GroEL (Sigma-Aldrich #G6532; 1:5000) antibodies diluted in 1× TBST buffer containing 3% BSA. Following three washes for 30 min in 1× TBST buffer, membranes were incubated with secondary α-mouse or α-rabbit HRP-linked antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich #A0168 or #A0545; 1:5000) diluted in 1× TBST buffer containing 3% BSA. After another three washes for 30 min in 1× TBST buffer, chemiluminescence was developed using the Novex™ ECL Chemiluminescent Substrate Reagent Kit (#WP20005, Thermo Fisher Scientific), visualized on ChemiDocTM XRS+, and quantified using ImageLabTM Software (both Biorad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fractionation and Characterization of B. thetaiotaomicron Cell Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B. thetaiotaomicron strains were grown in minimal medium to log phase. Cells were harvested and separated from the supernatant by centrifugation. Cells were then resuspended in breakage buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% glycerol) and lysed by sonication. The lysate and supernatant were filtered (0.2-μm pore size) to remove any whole cells before centrifugation at 100,000 × g at 4°C for 1 h. The pelleted membrane fraction was washed and resuspended in breakage buffer. The soluble and membrane fractions were then centrifuged a second time at 100,000 × g at 4°C for 1 h. Membrane pellets were resuspended in breakage buffer. The soluble fraction of the cells, and the supernatant fraction were concentrated using Amicon centrifugation, such that all three fractions were equal volume prior to analysis by immunoblotting. GroEL was assessed by immunoblot as a control for cytoplasmic proteins (rabbit anti-GroEL; Sigma, G6532).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Protein Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial samples were resuspended in 1× protein loading buffer and boiled at 98 °C for 8 min. 0.05 OD of proteins samples were loaded each lane. Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (#10600023, Cytiva) for 45 min at 150 V in transfer buffer. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 1× TBST buffer with 5% (w/v) skim milk (#A600669-0250, Sangon), washed with TBST twice and incubated with monoclonal α-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich #F1804-5MG; 1:10,000), α-SipC (1: 3,000) or α-GroEL (Sigma-Aldrich #G6532; 1:10,000) antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After three TBST washes, membranes were incubated with secondary α-mouse or α-rabbit HRP-linked antibodies (Sangon #D110087 or #D110058; 1:10,000) for 1 h at room temperature. Chemiluminescence was developed using the high sensitive ECL luminescence reagent (#C500044-0100, Sangon), and then visualized on ChemiScope 6000SE and quantified using ImageJ Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

EPEC Effector Secretion Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPEC effector secretion was determined as described previously (Cameron et al., 2018 (link)). Briefly, apical media were centrifuged at 4000 g, 4°C for 10 min. Supernatants were filter sterilized, concentrated 8-fold using Amicon Ultra-4 centrifugal filter units (10 MWCO, Millipore), and 5× reducing sample buffer (RSB) was added. Bacterial pellets were suspended in 1× RSB. After denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, proteins were separated in 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell, Bio-Rad) for 60 min at 150 V, 100 mA, 10 W. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Amersham™) by wet blotting at 100 V constant for 60 min. Membranes were blocked in 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 for 60 min and probed with rabbit anti-EspB (1:1000; Gad Frankel, Imperial College London, UK) (Knutton et al., 1998 (link)) or rabbit anti-E. coli GroEL (1:50,000; G6532, Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4°C. Blots were subsequently incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200,000; Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 min. Membranes were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce™) and imaged with a G:Box Chemi XRG Imager (Syngene). ImageJ Fiji software (https://imagej.net/software/fiji/) was used for densitometric analysis of imaged blots. EspB band intensities were normalized according to signals of the housekeeper protein GroEL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring TpxBt Levels under H2O2 Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the levels of TpxBt in the presence of H2O2, overnight cultures of WT and TpxBt-HIS strains were diluted 250-fold into 15 mL of TYG and grown until mid exponential phase (OD600 = 0.3-0.4). H2O2 was added at a final concentration of 100 μM, and 1.5 mL of culture was collected into microcentrifuge tubes and precipitated with the addition of 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to a final of 13%. Cultures were collected before and 10min, and 30min after the addition of H2O2. Protein was precipitated on ice for 20 hours, washed with 1 mL of ice-cold acetone, and resuspended in 100 μL of 1X protein loading buffer. His-tagged proteins were detected using a 1:2000 dilution of HIS antibody (mouse) GenScript, #A00186-100 and a fluorescent secondary antibody (Goat anti-mouse IgG DyLight 680 Conjugated (Invitrogen, #35519)). GroEL protein levels were measured using a 1:5,000 dilution of anti-GroEL rabbit antibody (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# G6532, RRID:AB_259939) and a fluorescent secondary antibody (Donkey anti-rabbit IRDye 680LT (Li-Cor, #926-68023)). Fluorescence was detected using an Amersham Imager 600 instrument with an excitation wavelength 630 nm and captured by the Cy5 filter. Western blots were quantified using ImageJ software with background subtraction, each band was normalized to GroEL loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!