The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistics package

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of statistical and analytical capabilities, allowing users to perform data management, data analysis, and data presentation. The core function of SPSS Statistics is to enable users to analyze and interpret data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

183 protocols using spss statistics package

1

Pandemic Stress Management Intervention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM SPSS Statistics package was used for all analyses (SPSS Version 26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive analyses were used to report the participant demographics. The within-group results of the PSQI and the PSS were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and type I error was set at 5%. We hypothesized an improvement at posttest with significant differences when compared to pretest. Cohen's d was used as the estimate for effect sizes. Results were interpreted as <0.2, trivial/negligible effect; 0.2-0.4, small effect; 0.5-0.8, moderate effect; >0.8, large effect (Cohen, 1998 ). In addition, we calculated the median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for each PSS individual question pretest to posttest, as well as Wilcoxon analyses, to provide insight into the possible stressors during the pandemic.
Based on previous literature, we utilized anticipated effect sizes between 0.60 and 0.76 (Greeson et al., 2014 (link); Huberty et al., 2019 (link)). Through the power analysis calculation planning for power at 80% and a one-tailed analysis, this indicated a range of participants, then increased to account for a potential 20% attrition rate, to aim to enroll from 17 to 20 participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative MRI Biomarkers for Glioma Grading

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics package (version 21; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The Ktrans, kep and ve values of different glioma grades were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction. The Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis was used to analyze the association between the pathological grades and the permeability parameters. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the sensitivities and specificities of different quantitative parameters, with the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) computed and the threshold values determined using the Youden Index.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pancreatic Tumor Texture Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The texture features in tumor and normal pancreas were compared using a Mann–Whitney rank test. A Wald test with Cox regression model was used to test for associations between each texture feature and survival. A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), including area under the curve (AUC), was used to study the prognostic value of each texture parameter. The medians were used for Kaplan-Meier plots. Data management and statistical analysis were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics package (version 23, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analyses were conducted with the disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (measured with months) using different statistical approaches (KM including log-rank, Breslow and Tarone-Ware tests). Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and figures showing p-values, quartile values, mean values and 95% confidence intervals were produced by IBM SPSS statistics package (26.0 version) software. Alpha was set to 0.05 and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Ocular Lens Treatments in Chickens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values reported represent the mean ± the standard error of the mean (including outliers). Any chicks which removed their lenses or diffusers were removed from the experiments and are therefore not reported. Before analysing the effect of treatment, all data, which represented measurements from individual chickens not technical replicates, were first tested for normality and homogeneity of variance (Shapiro–Wilk test). When there was no significant variance in normality or homogeneity, the effect of treatment was analysed via a one-way univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant, ANOVAs were followed by a student’s unpaired t-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing for analysis of specific between group effects. For the retrospective analysis of levodopa’s effects against LIM compared to its dose-dependent effects against FDM seen in our previous study27 (link), a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was undertaken. All analyses were undertaken in IBM SPSS Statistics package 23 with a statistical significance cut-off of 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Experimental Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-way Analysis of Variance tests were performed using SPSS Statistics Package (IBM, USA) to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of the experimental and control groups. Fisher's LSD post hoc was used for multiple comparisons between different groups. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Sex Differences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS statistics package (IBM SPSS statistics, version 26.0, IBM, New York, NY, USA). An independent sample t-test/Mann–Whitney U test and a Qui-squared test were used to analyze baseline differences between girls and boys for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Overtime within-group and between-group differences were analyzed with a paired sample t-test/Wilcoxon test and Generalized Estimating Equations. Associations among variables of interest were analyzed with nonparametric partial correlations controlling for sex and pubertal status (i.e., Tanner stage) using SPSS syntax commands and multiple linear regressions (stepwise and enter methods). A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of Experimental Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was carried out at least three times independently. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and subjected to one-way analysis of variance to find the significant difference in various parameters between the control and the treated groups. The post hoc Tukey honest significant difference tests were used to make comparisons between the control and each of the treated groups and to calculate P-values for comparison, P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The statistical analyses were implemented using the IBM SPSS Statistics package (version 21.0; IBM, Corps.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Factors Influencing BoNT-A Therapy Improvement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overall improvement (IMP), treatment-related, demographical and safety data were reported as mean values and standard deviations, or absolute numbers or percentage where appropiate. Student’s t test and non-parametric correlation analysis (rank correlation) were used to analyse the influence of age at onset of therapy, sex, duration of treatment, initial dose of incoBoNT/A, and increase of dose on improvement (IMP). For some parameter combinations, also a regression line and the Pearson correlation coefficient were calculated. All tests used were part of the SPSS statistics package (version 25; IBM, Armonk, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Repeated Measures Analysis of Body Metrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Separate repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to examine differences with dependent variables (weight, kcal, HR, Hct, Hgb, lactate, RER, VO2, and RPE). Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d (d) with accompanying meaning of trivial (0–0.19), small (0.20–0.49), medium (0.50–0.79), and large (>0.80). Sphericity was checked with Mauchly’s W. Means (M) and standard deviations (SD) are presented for descriptive purposes. Paired t-tests were utilized to compare body composition at the two assessment points and to compare familiarization and baseline outcomes. A level of 0.05 denoted significance. Analysis was conducted with the IBM SPSS Statistics package (Version 24, New York).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!