The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Enhanced chemiluminescence detection

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, France

Enhanced chemiluminescence detection is a sensitive analytical technique used to measure light emissions from chemical reactions. It is commonly used in life science research applications to detect and quantify specific proteins or molecules of interest.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

28 protocols using enhanced chemiluminescence detection

1

Quantitative Immunoblotting for Autophagy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were scraped into ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS with protease inhibitor cocktail) and lysed for 10 min on ice. Lysates were then centrifuged at 15,870g for 20 min at 4 °C and protein was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce, Waltham, MA). Samples were separated on 15% polyacrylamide SDS–PAGE gels and transferred to a polyvinyldifluoride membrane which was blocked with TBST plus 5% BSA and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (anti-LC3A/B (4108; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti-FTH1 (3998; Cell Signaling), and anti-Actin (A1978; Sigma)), diluted in blocking buffer. Blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated to secondary antibodies and protein was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Invitrogen). Densitometry analysis was carried out using ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Immunoblotting for Autophagy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were scraped into ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS with protease inhibitor cocktail) and lysed for 10 min on ice. Lysates were then centrifuged at 15,870g for 20 min at 4 °C and protein was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce, Waltham, MA). Samples were separated on 15% polyacrylamide SDS–PAGE gels and transferred to a polyvinyldifluoride membrane which was blocked with TBST plus 5% BSA and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (anti-LC3A/B (4108; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti-FTH1 (3998; Cell Signaling), and anti-Actin (A1978; Sigma)), diluted in blocking buffer. Blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated to secondary antibodies and protein was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Invitrogen). Densitometry analysis was carried out using ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting and Antibody Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Jacobs et al., 2008). Primary antibodies were followed by mouse- or rabbit-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (HRP). HRP-conjugated antibodies (anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG HRP conjugate, Promega) were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Thermofisher). This included the following antibodies: ACC (3662, Cell Signaling), phospho-ACC (3661, Cell Signaling), pan-AMPKα (2532, Cell Signaling), phospho-AMPKα (2535, Cell Signaling), 4EBP1 (9644, Cell Signaling), phospho-4EBP1 (2855, Cell Signaling), c-myc (9402, Cell Signaling), phospho-mTOR (5536, Cell Signaling), Activated Notch (ab8925, Abcam), RAPTOR (2280, Cell Signaling), phospho-RAPTOR (2083, Cell Signaling), S6 (2217, Cell Signaling), phospho-p70 S6K (9204, Cell Signaling), p70 S6K (2708, Cell Signaling), phosphor-TSC2 (5584, Cell Signaling), TSC2 (3612, Cell Signaling). Alternatively, primary antibodies were followed by fluorescently labeled anti-mouse or rabbit antibodies (LiCor) and imaged using the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LiCor). This included the following antibodies: Glut1 (ab652, Abcam), hexokinase 2 (2867, Cell Signaling), hexokinase 1 (ab104835, Abcam), cytochrome C (556433, BD Biosciences), β-actin (A5441, Sigma), phospho-S6 (4858, Cell Signaling). Western blots were quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot and Senescence-associated β-Galactosidase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates from different experiments were obtained by lysing the cells in RIPA buffer (Wanlei Biotechnology, Beijing, China). The BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used to quantify protein concentrations according to the manufacturer’s protocols. We used 10% SDS-PAGE to resolve 30 ug proteins and then transferred them to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C for 12 h, followed by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit or goat-anti-mouse secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, CA, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. Specific bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The signal intensity was determined with ImageJ software version 1.48. The antibodies used were: PIM1 (3247, Cell Signaling, 1: 2000), SND1 (ab65078, Abcam, 1: 1500), Phosphoserine (ab9332, Abcam, 1: 3000), and β-actin (PM053, MBL, 1: 5000). SA-β-gal activity was assessed as described previously [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After transfection, cells were washed with cold PBS before being solubilized in a lysis buffer containing 120 mM Tris/Hepes, pH 7,4; 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 3 mM KCl; 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors (Complete Roche 1697498, Meylan, France). Samples were then harvested and centrifuged at 16,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. For immunoprecipitation, cells were solubilized with lysis buffer containing 0.4 M NaCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9; 5% (v/v) glycerol; 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40) and protease inhibitors (Complete, Roche Diagnostics). Immunoprecipitation was carried out using anti-V5 (Invitrogen) or anti-ManIA (Sigma ) antibody, and affinity purification using protein G-agarose beads (Dynabeads, Invitrogen, Paris, France). After incubation with protein G-agarose beads for 1 h at room temperature, the immunocomplex was washed in PBS (Invitrogen). The protein samples were then boiled in loading buffer, run on gradient 7.5% or 10% or 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, probed with primary antibodies of interest and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Les Ulis, France) according to the manufacturer′s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Bone Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from mouse femurs adding RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 0.004% sodium azide) to ground bone. Proteins were run on an 8% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked with milk, and stained with osteocalcin (15 kDa) primary antibody (Clontech), HRP-linked anti-rat IgG secondary antibody (Abcam) and collagen 1 alpha 2 (130 kDa) primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), HRP-linked anti goat IgG secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Thermo Scientific). The loading control used was β-actin (43 kDa) (Abcam). P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test. Differences with a P-value of <0.05 were considered significant. Data were expressed as mean±SEM (standard error of the mean).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Expression and Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), incubated for 15 min on ice and centrifuged at 16 800 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the protein concentration. Proteins were resolved by SDS/PAGE and transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membrane. After blocking with 5% skim milk, membranes were individually probed with anti‐phospho‐AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐phospho‐ERK (Cell Signaling Technology), anticleaved caspase 3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐PARP (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐p21 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐MDM2 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐MDM4 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐p53 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐PUMA (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti‐actin (Sigma‐Aldrich Corporation) antibodies. The membranes were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibodies, followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoblotting for Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After transfection, cells were washed with cold PBS before being solubilized in a lysis buffer containing 120 mM Tris/Hepes, pH 7,4; 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 3 mM KCl; 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors (Complete Roche 1697498, Meylan, France). Samples were then harvested and centrifuged at 16,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Protein expression levels were assessed after normalizing and loading equal amounts of total protein for 7.5% SDS-PAGE separation and immunoblotting with the antibodies of interest and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. The primary antibodies used in this study were mouse anti–Myc (Takara, Clontech, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France) and anti-Sar1A (Invitrogen). Proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Les Ulis, France) according to the manufacturer′s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blotting Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was carried out by following standard protocols. Protein (30 μg) was separated by denaturing SDS–PAGE and then transferred on to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and then incubated overnight with the primary antibodies at 4 °C. Then, the blots were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies conjugated with HRP at RT for 1 h. Visualization was carried out by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Uncropped raw version of various blots is included in Supplementary Fig. 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl buffer pH 7.5 containing 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and protease inhibitors) for 20 min on ice. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation. The protein concentration in post-nuclear supernatants was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method as recommended by the manufacturer (Sigma), using bovine serum albumin as standard. Proteins from cell lysates or virus purification fractions were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-ECL; Amersham) by using a Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad). The proteins of interest were revealed with specific primary antibodies, followed by species-specific secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson Immunoresearch), and enhanced chemiluminescence detection as recommended by the manufacturer (Thermofischer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!