The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

750 3t scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The 750 3T-scanner is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system manufactured by GE Healthcare. It has a magnetic field strength of 3 Tesla, which is commonly used in advanced clinical and research applications. The 750 3T-scanner is designed to provide high-quality imaging for a variety of medical purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 750 3t scanner

1

fMRI Scanning Protocol for Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After undergoing a mock scanning session to familiarize participants with the fMRI environment and reduce motion, data were acquired on a GE 750 3T-scanner (Waukesha, WI) at the NIH. Each functional run included 231 functional image volumes with 24 contiguous axial slices (in-plane resolution=2.6×2.6 mm) obtained with a T2*-weighted echo-planar sequence (repetition time/echo time ([TR/TE])=2,300/25 ms, flip=50◦; field of view (FOV)=240mm, matrix=96×96). A high-resolution structural scan was acquired (axial plane) with a T1-weighted magnetization-prepared spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence (echo time/inversion time (TE/TI)=min full/425 ms, flip=7◦; FOV=220mm, matrix=256 ×256, in-plane resolution, 1.2×1.2 mm) for anatomical localization and co-registration of functional data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neuroimaging Protocol for Brain Function Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuroimaging data were collected on a GE 750 3 T scanner with a 32-channel head coil at the University of Michigan. Functional images were acquired using multiband echo planar (EPI) pulse sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 1.2 s; in-plane resolution = 2.5 × 2.5 mm; slice thickness = 3 mm; 51 sagittal slices; multiband acceleration factor = 3. Participants’ anatomical images were acquired at the end of the experiment using spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (SPGR) imaging with 1x1x1 mm3 spatial resolution. To reduce potential head motion, fMRI scans were acquired first, followed by the anatomical scan. The total duration of the scans related to this study was about 30 min. If possible, we also collected resting-state fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging scans at the end of the scanning session for analyses unrelated to the current study. However, some participants, especially the younger ones, could not complete these two additional scans, and the results of these scans are not reported here. The total duration of the MRI session with the additional scans was about 50 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Resting-State fMRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed information on the RS-fMRI acquisition is provided on https://www.nitrc.org/projects/eceo_rsfmri_9/. Here, we listed a summary of the acquisition parameters in Supplementary Table 1. All RS-fMRI data that we used in this study were acquired on GE 750 3T scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MRI Imaging Protocol for 3T Brain Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI scanning was performed on a GE × 750 3 T scanner (General Electric, Waukesha, WI, USA) with an eight-channel head coil and parallel imaging with the Array Spatial Sensitivity Encoding Technique. A T1-weighted volume scan was acquired in the axial plane with a 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence using the following parameters: inversion time (TI) = 450 ms; repetition time (TR) = 8.2 ms; echo time (TE) = 3.2 ms; flip angle = 12°; acquisition matrix = 256 mm × 256 mm, field of view (FOV) = 256 mm; slice thickness = 1.0 mm, no gap, yielding a voxel resolution of 1 mm isometric. A 3D T2 FLAIR sequence was acquired in the sagittal plane using the following parameters: TI = 1868 ms; TR = 6000 ms; TE = 123 ms; flip angle = 90°; acquisition matrix = 256 mm × 256 mm, FOV = 256 mm; slice thickness = 2.0 mm, no gap, yielding a voxel resolution of 1 mm × 1 mm × 2 mm. Additional details have been previously described [6 (link), 7 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3T fMRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were acquired on a GE 750 3T-scanner (Waukesha, WI), at the NIH. Each functional run included, 231 image volumes, with 24 contiguous axial slices (in-plane resolution = 2.6 × 2.6 mm) obtained with a T2*-weighted echo-planar sequence (repetition time/echo time ([TR/TE]) = 2,300/25 ms, flip = 50◦; field of view (FOV) = 240 mm, matrix = 96 × 96). To facilitate anatomical localization and co-registration of functional data, a high-resolution structural scan was acquired (axial plane) with a T1-weighted magnetization- prepared spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence (echo time/inversion time (TE/TI) = min full/425 ms, flip = 7◦; FOV = 220 mm, matrix = 256 × 256, in-plane resolution, 1.2 × 1.2 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Neuroimaging Protocol for Brain Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were collected in a GE 750 3 T scanner using a 32-channel head coil in the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center at the NIH.
The following imaging parameters were used:
T1-weighted anatomical images: Magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE), 3D inversion recovery, TR: 7.664 ms, TE: 3.42 ms, TI: 425 ms, slice thickness: 1 mm, 1 × 1 mm in-plane resolution, percent phase FoV: 100, flip angle: 7, matrix size: 256 × 256.
T2-weighted diffusion images: Fat-saturated, 62 images, TR: 7.500 ms, TE: 100.74 ms, slice thickness: 2.5 mm, 0.9375 mm × 0.9375 mm in-plane resolution, FoV: 240, percent phase FoV: 80, flip angle: 90, matrix size 256 × 256, maximum B value 1100, 70 diffusion directions and 10 non-diffusion weighted images.
Functional MRI data: Echoplanar images (EPI), TR: 2000 ms, TE: 27 ms, 40 slices with thickness: 3 mm, 2.5 × 2.5 mm in-plane resolution, axial orientation, FoV: 240, percent phase FoV: 100, flip angle: 70, matrix size: 96 × 96. FMRI data were collected during rest with eyes closed for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Knee MRI Protocol Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All scans were performed on a 3T 750 scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with the Institutional Review Board protocol at our institution. The volunteer scans used a 16-channel receive coil wrapped around the knee (GEM Flex by NeoCoil, Waukesha, WI, USA), the phantom scans used a single-channel transmit-receive wrist coil (GE BC-10 by Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA), and the patient scans used an 8-channel transmit-receive knee coil (Knee Array Coil by Invivo, Gainesville, FL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of Line-Based Signal Model and Denoising in MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We evaluated our line-based signal model and denoising method with simulations as well as phantom and in vivo scans, with parameters as shown in table 1. Spoiler gradient moments will be specified with the number of dephasing cycles (full rotational differences between spins in a voxel) produced by the gradient over a 3 mm slice, where Gn = n · 7.83 mT m−1 · ms gives n cycles of dephasing. This is a convenient unit as it should ideally be kept at integer values for proper spoiling.
All scans were performed on a 3T 750 scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). Informed subject consent was obtained in accordance with the Institutional Review Board protocol at our institution. All in vivo scans used a 16-channel flexible receive coil that wrapped around the knee (GEM Flex by NeoCoil). All scans used a water-selective spectral-spatial radiofrequency pulse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!