The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Omni 2.5 array

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The Omni 2.5 array is a high-density genotyping microarray platform developed by Illumina. It is designed to detect and analyze genetic variations across the human genome. The core function of the Omni 2.5 array is to provide comprehensive genomic coverage and enable the identification of genetic markers associated with various traits and diseases.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using omni 2.5 array

1

Ancestry Estimation using 1000 Genomes Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ancestry was estimated as previously described29 (link) using the reference population of 1,445 unrelated participants of the 1000 Genomes Project (1KG) comprising five superpopulation groups (African, Asian, South Asian, European, and American admixed). Genotypes of these individuals on the Illumina Omni 2.5 array (Illumina, San Diego, CA) were downloaded (29 August 2012), and variants were linked to dbSNP 135 identifiers using GATK (there were 41,572 SNPs shared between the Omni 2.5 array and the exome sequencing data set). To identify SNPs informative for ancestry, informativeness (In) was calculated across the five superpopulation groups, and markers were chosen in order of In that were in low linkage equilibrium (r2 < 0.2) with previously chosen markers within 1 Mb. SNPs with positive informativeness (n = 29,973) were used to cluster the genotypes of each MCCD case with the 1KG participants using multidimensional scaling in PLINK v1.07. To identify the most similar superpopulation for each MCCD case, a linear discriminant model was created based on the top 20 multidimensional scaling components using linear discriminant analysis (lda command in MASS package30 in R) with the 1KG individuals as a training set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ancestry Estimation using 1000 Genomes Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ancestry was estimated as previously described29 (link) using the reference population of 1,445 unrelated participants of the 1000 Genomes Project (1KG) comprising five superpopulation groups (African, Asian, South Asian, European, and American admixed). Genotypes of these individuals on the Illumina Omni 2.5 array (Illumina, San Diego, CA) were downloaded (29 August 2012), and variants were linked to dbSNP 135 identifiers using GATK (there were 41,572 SNPs shared between the Omni 2.5 array and the exome sequencing data set). To identify SNPs informative for ancestry, informativeness (In) was calculated across the five superpopulation groups, and markers were chosen in order of In that were in low linkage equilibrium (r2 < 0.2) with previously chosen markers within 1 Mb. SNPs with positive informativeness (n = 29,973) were used to cluster the genotypes of each MCCD case with the 1KG participants using multidimensional scaling in PLINK v1.07. To identify the most similar superpopulation for each MCCD case, a linear discriminant model was created based on the top 20 multidimensional scaling components using linear discriminant analysis (lda command in MASS package30 in R) with the 1KG individuals as a training set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Cancer Cell Analysis via Illumina Omni2.5 SNP Array

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Omni2.5 array (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was used to analyze cancer cell lines and matched normal samples at 2,379,855 (2.5 M) SNP loci. Analysis was carried out with Genome Studio with the following criteria: an average LogR Ratio (LRR) ≤ −2.0 for homozygous deletions (HDs); LRR of 0–0.53 and B Allele Frequency of 0 or 1 for loss of heterozygosity (LOH); and an average LRR ≥ 1.4, with at least one SNP LRR ≥ 2.0, for amplifications. At least four SNPs must fit criteria for the region to be called an alteration and boundaries were the first and last SNPs that meet criteria. Adjacent deleted or amplified regions (within 100 kb) were considered to be one alteration. Given that half or more of the p16 and SMAD4 inactivations are HDs, we excluded the 4 FPC and 81 SPC cases without SNP microarray data, in the analysis of p16 and SMAD4 genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

FSHR SNP Analysis in Mexican Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the allelic and genotype frequency of the FSHR SNPs found in the above described groups with those from an open Mexican population, a third group of data (SIGMA cohort) from a large database genotyped using the Illumina OMNI 2.5 array was analyzed. This reference sample was conformed by 8182 Mexican mestizo subjects participants in the Slim Initiative in Genomic Medicine from the Americas (SIGMA) Type 2 Diabetes Consortium [35 (link)] [3515 (43%) male and 4667 (57%) female; 4366 (53%) non-diabetic and 3848 (47%) subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D), all exhibiting Native American and European ancestry as determined by Principal Components Analysis [36 (link)]]. Details on the selection criteria, quality control procedure, and estimation of Native American and European ancestry proportions have been reported elsewhere [35 (link)]. In our secondary analysis of this reference database, information related with reproductive events such as age at menarche and menopause, and number of pregnancies in a subset of 520 women (aged 34 to 89 years, median 52 years) were extracted from this database (UIDS cohort; [35 (link)]) and analyzed for potential associations with the FSHR SNPs studied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lipid Profiling in Mexican Diabetes Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study participants in the Mexico City Diabetes Study, as well as
genotyping using the Illumina OMNI2.5 array and exome-sequencing, have been
previously described (Estrada et al.,
2014
; Williams et al.,
2014
). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the
study was approved by the Comité de Etica e Investigatión
committee at The Centro de Estudios en Diabetes. In sum, plasma from a total
of 677 individuals with genotyping, including 364 carriers of the
SLC16A11 risk haplotype (mean age 52.6 ± 7.6;
40.4 % male) and 313 controls (mean age 52.6 ± 7.6; 37.4 % male),
underwent lipid profiling as described below. No individuals at the time of
lipid profiling had type 2 diabetes. An analysis of the influence of sex on
the association between SLC16A11 status and TAG pattern was
not performed because sex is not known to influence the association between
SLC16A11 status and diabetes risk
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Affymetrix and Illumina genotyping for US Latina GWAS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SFBCS, NC-BCFR and GALA1 samples were genotyped with the Affymetrix 6.0 array according to the manufacturer’s instructions in the Laboratory of Esteban Gonzalez Burchard at UCSF. The MEC samples were genotyped with the Illumina Infinitum 660 W-Quad or the Omni 2.5 array in the Genomics Center at USC and at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA, USA).
Before imputation, we excluded 15 cases and 30 controls from the SFBCS/NC-BCFR/GALA1 set that had a genotyping call rate <95% or showed either known or cryptic relatedness. We excluded 26 cases and 8 controls from the MEC because of unexpected relatedness. The final analysis included 1,497 cases and 3,213 controls (1,699 individuals from the SFBCS/NC-BCFR/GALA1 set (977 cases and 722 controls) and 3,011 from the MEC (520 cases and 2,491 controls)).
A scatter plot of the first and second principal components estimated for the US Latina samples included in the discovery phase of the study showed the expected distribution for this population, with most samples spreading between the European and Asian axes (and beyond the Asian cluster towards what would be the Indigenous American cluster) and a smaller proportion of samples deviating towards the African cluster (Supplementary Fig. 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole Genome Sequencing of Autism Families

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pilot study of two SSC families (SSC_12605 and SSC_12596) and one Utah family (K21) was conducted. The SSC was assembled at 13 clinical centers, with the blood drawn from parents and children (affected and unaffected) sent to the Rutgers University Cell and DNA Repository (RUCDR) for DNA preparation. WGS was performed at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) on the two SSC families using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform at an average coverage of 75×, using paired-end 100-bp reads.
The Utah family had previously undergone fragile X screening and chromosomal microarray (CMA) genotyping for the proband and mother at the University of Utah. K21 blood samples were collected at the Utah Foundation for Biomedical Research, and genomic DNA was extracted and purified. Finally the DNA was quantified using Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Invitrogen) and 1 µg was sent to the CSHL sequencing facility where WGS was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform at an average coverage of 40× using paired-end 100-bp reads, and a parallel DNA sample was genotyped with an Illumina Omni2.5 array at the CHOP core facility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Whole-Exome Sequencing of Diverse Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, 3862 samples were selected for whole-exome sequencing from a larger data set of 8214 samples previously genotyped with the OMNI 2.5 array (Illumina).4 (link) To increase representation of genetic variation not queried in studies of European populations, selection criteria for whole-exome sequencing was based on the proportion of Native American ancestry estimated from principal component analysis of genotype data (eMethods section and eFigures 1 and 2 in the Supplement). Whole-exome sequencing was performed on blood DNA from these samples using Sure-Select Human All Exonv2.0(Illumina),44-Mb–baited target. Raw reads were mapped with the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner, reprocessed with Picard to recalibrate base quality scores and perform local realignment around known indels. Genetic variants were called with the Genome Analysis Toolkit Unified Genotyper module14 (link) and were filtered to remove likely artifacts using several quality-control metrics such as mean coverage, concordance of nonreference genotypes with array data, and missing rate as specified in the eMethods section in the Supplement. Independent replication was sought in whole-exome sequence data from the T2D-GENES and GoT2D projects, which together sequenced 13 098 individuals from 5 ethnic groups (Europeans, East Asians, African Americans, South Asians, and Latinos).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ancestry Identification Using 1KG Participants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the participants of the 1KG [13 (link)] as a reference population for ancestry identification. These individuals derive from 21 different population groups covering five superpopulations: African (AFR), East Asian (ASN), South Asian (SAN), European (EUR), and Ad Mixed American (AMR) (see Additional file 1). We obtained genetic data for 1,445 unrelated individuals profiled on the Illumina Omni 2.5 array ([19 ]), and annotated sites to dbSNP 135 identifiers using GATK [18 (link)]. We focused on the 41,572 sites that overlapped those on the HumanExome Array.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping Using Illumina OMNI2.5 and Exome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of study participants using the Illumina OMNI2.5 array (Williams et al., 2014 (link)) and exome-sequencing (Estrada et al., 2014 (link)) have been described previously. The Genomics Platform at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA) received, quality controlled, and tracked DNA samples, and carried out exome array processing. The samples were plated into 96-well plates that included a quality control sample for processing on the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA) using manufacturer’s protocols. The arrays were scanned using Illumina iScans.
Genotypes were called using Birdsuite (https://www.broadinstitute.org/birdsuite/birdsuite). Clusters were fit using the Birdseed algorithm to each genotyping plate independently. Genotypes with confidence below 99.9% were excluded from analysis (e.g. considered “missing” or “no-call” genotypes). Samples with low numbers of non-reference alleles (< ~20,000, depending on the cohort), low call rate (<99.3%) or unusually high heterozygosity (> ~0.05, depending on the cohort) were removed from subsequent analysis; thresholds were chosen based on visual inspection of the sample distributions. Variants with low call rate (<99.2%) or mean confidence for alternative genotype calls (<99%) were also excluded from subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!