The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using cd44 apc

1

Multiparametric Flow Cytometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adherent cells were collected by trypsinization, stained using antibodies CD49f-APC (FAB13501A), CD140b-FITC (FAB1263F) (R&D Systems), PROCR (CD201)-PE (130-105-256), EpCAM-PE (130-091-253), EpCAM-APC (130-091-254) (Miltenyi Biotech Inc.), CD271-APC (345108) (Biolegend), CD44-APC (559942), CD24-PE (555428), CD73-PE (561014), CD90-APC (559869), CD166-PE (559263), JAM-1-PE (552556), MUC-1-FITC (559774) (BD Pharmingen), CD10-PE (340920) (BD Biosciences), and CD117-FITC (11-1178-42) (eBioscience), and were acquired using a BD LSR II flow cytometer. Data were analyzed using CellQuest or FlowJo software. Forward and side scatter were used to ensure that only live cells were considered in the analysis. Gating was done using appropriate FITC (555573), PE (555749) and APC (555576) (BD Pharmingen) isotype control antibodies and only a representative isotype control for two fluorescent markers are shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CD44 Expression Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached into single cells, washed with cold PBS, preincubated with Human TruStain FcX™ (422,301; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and then incubated with CD44-APC (B265921; BioLegend) on ice in the dark. The cells were assayed by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenotypic Characterization of Canine BMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenotypic characterization of canine BMSCs was performed as described.18 Adherent cells were dissociated with 0.05% trypsin‐ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Life Technologies) and resuspended in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were washed once with phosphate‐buffered saline (Life Technologies), and after centrifugation the phosphate‐buffered saline was removed and replaced with phosphate‐buffered saline containing 2% canine serum (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK). The cells were placed on ice for 20 minutes, followed by incubation for a further 20 minutes on ice with monoclonal antibodies against cluster of differentiation 11b (CD11b; AbD Serotec), CD29‐PE (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD44‐APC (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), CD45‐eFlour (ebioscience, San Diego, CA), and CD90‐APC (ebioscience). The CD11b antibody was detected using goat polyclonal secondary antibody to mouse immunoglobulin G heavy and light chains (DyLight 488; Abcam). Isotype‐identical antibodies were used as controls. Flow‐cytometric analyses were performed using the Gallios system (Beckman Coulter, Danvers, MA). Propidium iodide (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used to exclude dead cells from analyses. Each sample was assessed at least in triplicate. Data were analyzed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Lymphocyte Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell suspensions from iliac lymph nodes, blood and tumors were first incubated with 1µg/106 cells of Fc block treatment (BD Pharmigen) and then stained for surface markers in FACS buffer (PBS + 1% FBS). For Treg staining on cells isolated from iliac lymph nodes: Live/Dead (Fixable Near-IR Dead Cell stain kit, Life Technologies); CD3 FITC, clone 145-2C11 (Biolegend); CD4 Pacific Blue, clone RM4-5 (Biolegend); Foxp3 APC, clone FJK-16S (eBioscience). For Treg staining on cells isolated from tumors: Live/Dead (Fixable Near-IR Dead Cell stain kit, Life Technologies); CD45 PerCP-Cyanine 5.5 (eBioscience); CD4 Pacific Blue, (Biolegend); CD8 Brilliant Violet 510, clone 53-6.7 (Biolegend); Foxp3 APC, (eBioscience). For effector memory staining on cells isolated from blood: Live/Dead (Fixable Near-IR); CD8 PerCP, (Biolegend); CD44 APC (Biolegend); CD62L FITC, clone MEL-14 (BD Pharmigen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Splenic T Cell Subsets by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For splenic T cell sorting, magnetic bead-mediated positively selected CD4+ cells were stained with combinations of antibodies (0.5μg/mL per) to CD62L-PE (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) or CD62L-BB515 (BD Bioscience), CD44-APC (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD45Rb-APC/Cy7 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD124 (1μg/mL, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and CD25-BV421 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). For Tregs, FoxP3-RFP reporter signal was used for FACS. Cells were washed twice in MACS buffer (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA) before sterile cell sorting using a FACSAria (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) with the support of the Cytometry & Imaging Microscopy Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Analysis of all FACS data was performed using FlowJo v10 (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MSC Surface Marker Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze cell-surface expression of typical MSC surface marker proteins, cells were detached, counted and labeled with the following anti-human antibody conjugates: CD44 - APC; CD73 - APC; CD90 - PE; CD14 - PerCp/Cy5.5; CD45 - PerCp/Cy5.5; CD31 - FITC; CD34 - FITC; CD19 - Pacific Blue; HLA-DR - Pacific Blue (all from Biolegend) and also CD105 PE (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The mouse isotype antibodies used as the respective controls were: Pacific Blue IgG1; Pacific Blue IgG2a; IgG1k PErCp/Cy5.5; IgG2a PerCp/Cy5.5; IgG1k PE; IgG1k APC and IgG1k FITC (all from Biolegend®, San Diego, CA, USA). A total of 10,000 labeled cells were acquired using a Gallios Flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and results analyzed with Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Characterization of MSC-Derived EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface markers on MSC-EVs were analyzed using Apogee A50-Micro flow cytometer (Apogee Flow Systems, UK). The following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against murine antigens were used according to the manufacturer’s protocols: CD29-APC (clone: HMβ1-1, Biolegend), CD44-APC (clone: IM7, Biolegend), CD81-APC (clone: Eat2, BD Bioscence), CD90-APC (clone: 30-H12, Biolegend), CD309-APC (clone: Avas12, Biolegend) and Sca-1-APC (clone: E13-161.7, Biolegend) as well as the following isotype controls: Armenian hamster IgG-APC (clone: HTK888, Biolegend), Rat IgG2a, κ-APC (clone: RTK2758, Biolegend) and rat IgG2b, κ-APC (clone: RTK4530, Biolegend). MSC-EVs were co-stained with SYTO RNA Select dye (ThermoFisher Scientific), which binds RNA molecules. Staining was conducted for 30 min in the dark at 4 °C. The obtained results were analyzed using Apogee Histogram software (Apogee Flow Systems). In order to confirm the presence of the indicated antigens on MSC-EVs, an ImageStream X Mark II imaging cytometer (Merck) was additionally used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cancer Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured, divided and treated into HCCMF, RCF or SHAM groups. After seven days of treatment cells were labelled for CD44-APC (mouse anti-human 1:20,000(Huh7) and 1:10(Hep3B), Cat#103011 Biolegend) and CD133-PE (mouse anti-human 1:10 (Huh7) and 1:20(Hep3B), Cat# 130–098-826 Miltenyi Biotec) markers of cancer stem cell, fixed and analysed via flow cytometry. Data collection was performed on a C6 Accrui flow cytometer while analysis was performed on CFlow Plus software (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometric Analysis of T-Cell Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Harvested cells were stained for flow cytometry in PBS for 20 min at RT. The following antibodies were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, United States) and used for flow cytometric analysis: CD8a-BV510 (cat: 100752, clone: 53-6.7, dilution 1:200), CD45.1-PacificBlue (cat: 110722, clone: A20, dilution 1:200), CD44-APC (cat: 559250, clone: IM7, dilution 1:100), CD11c-PerCP (cat: 117326, clone: N418, dilution 1:200), CD69-PeCy7 (cat: 104512, clone: H1.2F3, dilution 1:100), CD25-FITC (cat: 553072, clone: 3C7, dilution 1:100). The viability of cells was determined by using fixable near-IR dead cell staining (LifeTechnologies, Carlsbad, United States). Biotinylation was assessed by streptavidin-PE (BioLegend) staining for 10 min at RT. T-cell activation was determined by the expression of GFP expression under the control of the Nur77 promoter. Data was acquired on a CantoTM flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, Allschwil, Switzerland) and analyzed using the FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA) (see Supplementary Fig. 12 for gating strategy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

T cell transfer colitis protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The T cell transfer colitis model has been described previously.18 (link) Briefly, for transfer of CD4+ naïve T cells, splenic CD4+ cells from CD4-Cre+/TgMettl14FL/FL conditional knockout mice and littermate control mice were isolated with CD4+ T cell isolation kit II (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The isolated CD4+ T cells were then stained with CD4-FITC, CD25-PE, CD62L-BV421 and CD44-APC (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). Naïve T cells were fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) sorted as CD4+, CD25, CD62L+, and CD44 cells. Each recipient Rag1–/– mice was injected with 5 × 105 naïve T cells. For co-transfer of CD4+ naïve T cells and Treg cells, naïve T cells were isolated as described previously from C57BL6-CD45.1 mice in which the CD45.1 marker can be used as a donor marker for naïve T cells. For isolation of Treg cells, splenic CD4+ cells from Foxp3YFP–CreMettl14FL/FL conditional knockout mice and littermate control mice were isolated with CD4+ T cell isolation kit II (Miltenyi Biotec). The T cells were then stained with CD4-APC-Fire750 (BioLegend). Treg cells were sorted as YFP+ CD4+ cells. Recipient Rag1–/– mice were injected with naïve T cells and Treg cells at a 2:1 ratio. The mice were then weighed every 3–4 days. Mice were scarified 7–8 weeks after T cell transfer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!