The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Oasis max μelution plate

Manufactured by Waters Corporation

The Oasis MAX μElution plate is a laboratory equipment product designed for sample preparation. It functions as a solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge, enabling the concentration and purification of analytes from complex matrices. The product features a unique μElution format that allows for efficient elution and recovery of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using oasis max μelution plate

1

Ultraperformance LC-MS analysis of lipid mediators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AA- and LA-derived lipid mediators detectable by our ultraperformance LC-MS approach were assessed in the mucus samples collected at the time of surgery (see Fig E1 in this article’s Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Twenty-five to 40 μL of each mucus specimen was placed into a microcentrifuge tube containing 5000 μL 25% methanol in water and internal standard mix (1 ng each deuterated eicosanoid). The sample was vortexed and spun to pellet protein. The supernatant was then extracted on an Oasis MAX μElution plate (Waters Corp, Milford, Mass) as follows: Sample wells were first washed with methanol (200 μL) followed by 25% methanol in water (200 μL). The sample was then loaded into the well and washed with 600 μL 25% methanol. Eicosanoids were eluted from the plate with 30 μL 2-propanol/acetonitrile (50/50, vol/vol) containing 5% formic acid into a 96-well elution plate containing 30 μL water in each well. Samples were analyzed on a Waters Xevo TQ-XS triple quadrupole mass spectrometer connected to a Waters Acquity I-Class ultraperformance LC (Waters Corp). Separation of analytes was obtained using an Acquity PFP column (2.1 × 100 mm), with mobile phase A being 0.01% formic acid in water and mobile phase B acetonitrile. Eicosanoids were separated using a gradient elution beginning with 30% B going to 95% B over 8 minutes at a flow rate of 0.250 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Efficient Extraction and Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 10 μl of combined internal standards and 720 µl of 75% ACN, 0.1% NH4OH were added to 250 μl of calibrator/control/patient sample. Following 15 s vortexing, the samples were then centrifuged at 4°C at 6000g for 10 min and 800 µl of supernatant were transferred and evaporated to dryness at 40°C. Extracts were reconstituted with 500 μl of 5% NH4OH and transferred into corresponding wells of preconditioned Oasis® MAX μElution Plate (Waters). The samples were pulled through at low vacuum using Waters 96‐well Extraction Plate Vacuum Manifold and the wells were washed with 200 μl of 5% NH4OH followed by 200 μl of 60% ACN. The elution step was carried out by two‐step addition of 25 μl aliquots of 30% ACN, 1% FA into each well and collecting eluent into a plate containing 50 µl of 20BMA. The plate was sealed, and the content of wells mixed well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Plasma CP-I and CMPF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma CP‐I and CMPF concentrations were measured simultaneously according to the methods reported by Suzuki et al.
17 (link) Briefly, Oasis MAX μElution Plate (Waters) was used to pretreat 250 μL of plasma by solid phase extraction. The extract was analyzed by ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry using the Nexera X2 LC system coupled to LCMS−8040 Liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (Shimadzu) equipped with electrospray ionization. The 15N4‐CP‐I and CMPF‐d5 were used as internal standards for CP‐I and CMPF, respectively. CP‐I was measured with (M + H)+ signal in positive ion mode, and CMPF was measured with (M – H) signal in negative ion mode. The tandem mass spectrometry transitions monitored were mass‐to‐charge ratio (m/z) 655.4 → m/z 596.3 for CP‐I, m/z 659.3 → m/z 600.3 for 15N4‐CP‐I, m/z 239.0 → m/z 195.2 for CMPF, and m/z 244.2 → m/z 200.2 for CMPF‐d5. The assays were validated in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Bioanalytical Method Validation.
20 The lower limit of quantification was 0.1 ng/mL for CP‐I and 50 ng/mL for CMPF. The within‐batch accuracy of the assay ranged from 92.1% to 110.2% for CP‐I, and from 99.1% to 109.3% for CMPF. The within‐batch precision was less than 7.6% for CP‐I and 3.4% for CMPF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!