The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using aptima sars cov 2 assay

1

SARS-CoV-2 Detection via Aptima Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SARS-CoV-2 RNA was obtained from upper respiratory specimens (nasopharyngeal swab) by a commercial molecular test—the AptimaTM SARS-CoV-2 Assay with the PantherTM Fusion System (Hologic, Rome, Italy)—following the manufacturer’s instructions. This assay received emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Briefly, the assay combines the technologies of target capture, transcription-mediated amplification, and dual kinetic assay, and detects two conserved regions of the ORF1ab gene. Quantitative results were determined by a cutoff based on the total relative light units and the type of kinetic curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Respiratory Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SARS-CoV-2 RNA was studied in upper respiratory specimens (nasopharyngeal swab) by a commercial molecular test, AptimaTM SARS-CoV-2 Assay with the PantherTM Fusion System (Hologic, Italia, Rome), following the manufacturer’s instruction. This assay received Emergency Use Authorization by the Food and Drug Administration. Briefly, the assay combines the technologies of target capture, Transcription Mediated Amplification, and Dual Kinetic Assay and detects two conserved regions of the ORF1ab gene. Qualitative results were determined by a cut-off based on the total Relative Light Units and the kinetic curve type [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Variants Amidst Omicron Surge

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between December 2021 and March 2022, all nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) received in our laboratory were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 with qualitative diagnostic molecular assays able to detect all viral variants circulating at that time (Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay (Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) or Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)), as declared by the companies. Samples that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 were tested using TaqPath for rapid discrimination between the Omicron BA.1 variant and Delta variant and between the Omicron BA.1 variant and Omicron BA.2 variant, as recommended by the ECDC and WHO [14 ,15 ]. Several samples (see below) were then analyzed with the Novaplex SARS-CoV-2 Variant VII assay.
All procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of INMI Lazzaro Spallanzani (n.70/2018).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Viral Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each participant, an NPS was collected in a viral transport medium (Greiner Bio One® or Labo Moderne LMR®, Ozyme®). Each fresh sample was subsequently split into two aliquots: one 400-µL aliquot for antigen testing by EIA and another aliquot for concomitant SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by means of a commercially available NAAT (TMA-based Aptima™ SARS CoV-2 Assay, Hologic, San Diego, California; or PCR-based Alinity m® SARS CoV-2 Assay Abbott, Germany). Samples found to be RNA-positive in TMA were retested by RT-PCR (ARGENE® SARS-COV-2 R-GENE, bioMérieux, France, or RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0) for the determination of Ct values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

COVID-19 Sample Collection and Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were received within the routine diagnostic service. Upper-airway samples were collected into viral transport medium following Public Health England guidelines [11 ]. Lower-airway samples (sputum, tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage washings) were transported in universal containers and underwent mucolysis with Mucolyse Sputum Digestant (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Richmond Hill, Canada). Initial testing used one of two platforms: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) against one or two targets using an in-house assay, or transcription-mediated amplification against two targets using the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay on the Panther System (Hologic, Marlborough, United States). Assays are detailed in the web-only Supplementary Material (Methods).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Variant Detection Protocols for SARS-CoV-2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 at sites across the province were referred to the ProvLab for VOC testing. Assays used to test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 included the following rRT-PCR assays: E gene laboratory-developed test (19 (link)), cobas SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Molecular Systems), Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid), Simplexa COVID-19 Direct (Diasorin Molecular), Allplex 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene), BD SARS-CoV-2 Reagents for the BD Max System (Becton, Dickinson and Company), Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Hologic), and an E/N gene laboratory-developed test (unpublished data). Point-of-care testing was also performed using the ID NOW COVID-19 test (Abbott Laboratories) and Panbio rapid antigen test (Abbott Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

COVID-19 Testing Protocol Using Molecular Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NP swabs for confirmatory molecular testing were collected by a health care professional, placed in viral transport medium (VTM) (virus sampling kit; Yocon Biology Technology Company, Beijing, China), and sent to the reference laboratory. Molecular confirmation was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 or Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV assays (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay on the Panther system (Hologic, Inc., San Diego, USA), or the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test on the 6800 instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Meinheim, Germany) (43 (link)). Where available, cycle threshold (CT) values were recorded. For consistency, only CT values derived from the Xpert SARS-CoV-2 FluA/B/RSV assay were used for the CT stratification analyses, as this platform was used for the majority of samples. Positive and negative RT-PCR results were communicated to the patient, and any positive results were also reported to Public Health for further management and case contact tracing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using Aptima Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay on the Panther instrument (Hologic, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) targets two parts of the ORF1 ab region of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and one internal control. This test is based on End-Point Transcription-Mediated Amplification (EP-TMA), which is a binary test for the presence or absence of SARS-CoV-2 [11 (link),12 (link)]. After amplification, chemiluminescent probes hybridize to amplicons and emit light measured by a luminometer in relative light units (RLUs). For valid samples, the RLU value will range between approximately 250 (internal control only) and 1250 RLUs with a positive internal control, and two positive targets (of 500 RLUs each). Assay results are determined by a cutoff based on the total RLU and the kinetic curve type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SARS-CoV-2 Testing Capacity: From Wave 1 to Wave 2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our laboratory began testing on 13 March 2020 with initial capacity for around 150 PCR tests per day, before increasing to around 500 tests per day in late April during wave 1 and up to 1000 tests per day during wave 2 (online supplemental figure 1).
Testing commenced during the first wave on 13 March 2020 was limited to cases requiring admission or inpatients who had symptoms of fever or cough, as per national recommendation; guidance suggested cases which did not require admission should not be tested. For wave 2, all cases admitted to the hospital were screened and underwent universal interval screening at varying time points. Staff testing for symptomatic healthcare workers (HCWs) was also introduced towards the end of wave 1. Comparative analysis was therefore restricted to SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive cases requiring admission. Cases without laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection were not included.
Assays used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA include PCR testing using Aus Diagnostics or by the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay. Nucleic acid was first extracted using the QIAGEN QIAsymphony SP system and a QIAsymphony DSP Virus/Pathogen Mini Kit (catalogue number 937036) with the off-board lysis protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Healthcare Workers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testing of HCW for SARS-CoV-2 was performed using routine diagnostic procedures in the virology laboratory of the University Hospital of Lyon (Hospices Civils de Lyon, HCL) and included: transcription mediated amplification (TMA) (Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay, Hologic, Marlborough, US), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (SARS-CoV-2 ID NOW, Abbott, Sligo, Ireland) and RT-qPCR with different kits (Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay, Roche, Basel, Switzerland or Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assay, Hologic). To determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) in HCW, available positive samples with quantification cycle (Cq) < 28 were sequenced using COVIDSeq (Illumina) as previously described [12 (link)]. Libraries were sequenced to 1 M paired-end reads (2 × 100 bp) and data were analysed using the in-house seqmet bioinformatic pipeline (available at https://github.com/genepii/seqmet). Clades and lineages were determined on samples with genome coverage > 90% using Nextclade and PangoLEARN, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!