The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman grade 1

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United Kingdom

Whatman grade 1 is a type of filter paper used for general laboratory filtration purposes. It is a cellulose-based medium designed to provide effective filtration of a variety of aqueous and non-aqueous solutions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using whatman grade 1

1

Oyster Opening and Shucking Yield

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Opening rate and shucking yield were analyzed using 20 oysters of each condition studied. Each oyster was examined and opening effects were recorded as follows: no adductor muscle release (no opening), partial adductor muscle release (partial opening) and total adductor muscle release (full opening) [24 (link)]. Shucking yield was measured according to Cruz-Romero et al. [21 (link)]. After calculating the opening rate, oysters were shucked, drained in a stomacher filter bag (Seward, London, UK) and subsequently dried by placing the oyster tissue between 2 filter papers (Whatman Grade 1; Whatman International, Maidstone, UK) for 5 min. Shucking yield was expressed as mass of oyster tissue (g) per 100 g of whole closed oyster.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tenebenal™ Mosquito Bioassay Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The efficacy of Tenebenal™ via tarsal contact was evaluated against 4 mosquito strains (An. gambiae: susceptible Kisumu, resistant Kisumu RDL; Ae. aegypti: susceptible New Orleans, resistant Cayman) [10 (link)]. Solutions of Tenebenal™ were made up in acetone in a tenfold dilution series from 1 to 0.00001%. An aliquot of 0.66 ml of each solution was added to 0.66 ml of a carrier oil (Dow Corning 556 cosmetic grade fluid, Azelis UK Life Sciences Ltd, Hertford, UK) and 0.66 ml of additional acetone. Using a pipette with a disposable tip, the resulting 1.98 ml of mixture was dripped carefully onto each 12 cm × 15 cm filter paper (Whatman® Grade 1), trying to cover the paper as evenly as possible, to give a tenfold dilution series from 366.66 to 0.0036 mg/sq m. Papers were dried overnight in a fume hood. Treated filter papers were wrapped in aluminium foil and stored at 4 °C until used for bioassays.
Three replicates of 10 adult female mosquitoes of each strain were exposed to each filter paper for 60 min using the World Health Organization (WHO) standard susceptibility test method [14 ], with parallel exposures to an untreated paper and 0.01, 0.1 and 1% etofenprox and deltamethrin papers as reference treatments. After exposure, mosquitoes were held as for the topical application assay and scored for KD (1 h post-exposure) and mortality (24, 48 and 72 h post-exposure).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fining Agents Evaluation in Winemaking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After receiving the three untreated wines, the reference fining agents (x4) and the YPE (x2) were simultaneously tested. Fining assays were conducted in triplicates, during 48 h, using glass bottles of 275 ml of total volume. Just before the fining trials, each bottle was filled in with 250 ml of wine and the experiments were conducted at a controlled temperature of 22 ± 2°C. For the application of the reference fining agents, the dosages (minimum and maximum) were defined according to the supplier recommendations. In the case of the two YPE, the fining dosages were determined according to the previously fining experiments performed at laboratory scale. The tested dosages are presented in Table 1. Fining substances were left to flocculate and sediment to the bottom of the bottles during 48 h. Clarified wine samples (supernatants) were then gently pipetted and filtered through a qualitative paper filter, pore size 11 μm (Whatman™ Grade 1) to new, clean bottles. Wine samples were posteriorly analyzed by the following wine analytical methodologies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Paper-based Origami Cell Construction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphate buffered saline (1X PBS, without calcium and magnesium, pH 7.4, Cellgro, Manassas, VA, USA) solution containing 37 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4 and potassium ferricyanide (PF, 99+%, for analysis, ACROS OrganicsTM, Morris, NJ, USA) was purchased from Fisher Scientific. All chemicals were used as received without further purification. Silver foil (Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA, 0.10 mm thickness, 99.998% pure, annealed) and platinum foil (Alfa Aesar, 0.127 mm thickness, 99.99%, Premion®) were used for reference and counter electrodes. Chromatographic cellulose filter paper (Whatman grade 1, 0.18 mm thickness, WhatmanTM, Florence, SC, USA) was used for the paper-based Origami cell construction. Circuit paper (AgIC International Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used for printing the silver conductive pathway.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hop Extraction Methods Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hop (H. lupulus L.) pellet samples of four different varieties
(Cascade, Saaz, Tettnang, and Summit) were selected according to their
widespread use in brewing production and obtained from a local beer
producer (Menaresta Brewery, Carate Brianza, Italy). Hop pellets (2
g) were extracted in (a) boiling water (200 mL) for 2 h or (b) hydroalcoholic
solution (10% ethanol in water) at 30 °C for 24 h under magnetic
stirring. The suspension was filtered on a cotton and paper filter
(Whatman grade 1, pore size 11 μm) and, finally, the permeate
was concentrated under reduced pressure. Residues were freeze-dried,
and samples were stored at −20 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Olive Oil Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The olive samples were coarsely crushed with the help of a hammer. A representative aliquot of the solid samples (olives, olive paste, residual pomace) was then dried in an oven at 75 °C for 12 h to remove moisture and thus facilitate solvent extraction. Next, the samples were ground, and a 15 g aliquot was added to 40 mL of hexane and subjected to ultrasound-assisted extraction for 1 h in the case of olive samples and 2 h in the case of pomace samples. The extract was then filtered on paper (Whatman™ Grade 1), collected in a flask along with the washes (5 × 3 mL of hexane), and, finally, the solvent was removed from the extracted oil by means of a rotary evaporator until a constant weight was achieved.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fabrication of PDMS-based Composite Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation procedure was reported in previous study [12]. Briefly, PDMS was dissolved in THF so that a dilute solution of 0.7% PDMS by weight was obtained, into which three types of filler particles were added, each equivalent in weight to PDMS, so that weight of the filling materials in the mixture corresponded to 3 times the weight of PDMS (Table 1). The dispersion mixture was mixed with a magnetic stirrer and then in an ultrasonic bath and transferred to the tank of the spray gun without delay. The dispersion mixture was applied onto Whatman Grade 1 with a spray gun while the distance between the spray gun nozzle and the paper substrate was kept constant. Afterwards, the samples were left in the hood overnight for the evaporation of the THF solvent. Samples were then heat-treated at 120 °C for 36 h. After the heat treatment step, samples were left to cool to 23 °C. Soxhlet extraction with THF was performed to get rid of the excess/unreacted PDMS.
At least 10 samples were prepared for each of the above listed sample sets. It is important to note that the PDMS/GS/aero/N20 sample has a similar composition with those of the samples prepared in our previous study. The aim of preparing PDMS/GS/aero/N20 is to be able to compare the properties of the 6 above mentioned sample sets having different coating formulations with each other and with WFP control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Silanization of Paper Triangles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paper triangles were cut manually from filter paper (Whatman grade 1) with base width of 9.5 mm and height of 16.5 mm (paper area was approximately 80 mm2). Typically, the precut paper triangles were treated using 0.5 mL of trichloro(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)silane or trichloromethylsilane in a vacuum desiccator. The untreated paper was not subject to this reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enzymatic Activities of C. uda Fermentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

C. uda has the capability of expressing cellulose and hemicellulose degrading enzymes [11 (link), 12 (link), 58 (link)]. The cellulase activity of the fermentation broth was measured by a filter paper assay as described previously for a general approach [59 ]. Nevertheless, the assay was adjusted to the requirements of the present process as follows: (I) 0.2 M MOPS buffer pH = 7.4 was applied instead of citrate buffer and (II) 6 cm−2 of filter paper (Whatman grade 1, Whatman plc, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), 1 mL MOPS buffer and 1 mL of culture broth were incubated at 313 K and 1400 rpm for 240 min (Thermomixer‐compact, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany).
The xylanase activity was determined according to Rapp and Wagner [12 (link)] with some modifications: (I) 0.05 M sodium citrate buffer pH = 5 was applied instead of phosphate buffer in order to produce the 0.7 w% xylan testing solution and (II) 1 mL of culture broth and 1 mL of xylan solution were incubated at 323 K for 90 min.
The enzymatic reaction was stopped after the incubation period by heating up the sample to 368 K for 10 min. Sugar concentrations (cellobiose and xylose) were determined using HPLC, as described in the supporting information.
The enzymatic activity A, both for cellulase and for xylanase, was determined according to the Equation (2).
A=(cSugar,Assay0.5·cSugar,Fermentation)·VAssayMSugar·tAssay·16.67
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chromium Toxicity Assessed in Earthworms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The filter paper test was performed as described in the OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals (OECD, 1984) . Worms were kept on clean moist filter paper for 3 h before being placed in test dishes to allow them to void their gut contents. Animals were then washed with deionised water and dried before use. K 2 Cr 2 O 7 was dissolved in Milli-Q water to give the range of Cr(VI) concentrations used in the experiment i.e. 2, 15, 30 µg mL -1 . Then, 1 ml of each contaminant solution was spread onto a filter paper (Whatman grade 1), evaporated to dryness and placed on the bottom of a Petri dish. Control filter papers were treated with 1 ml of Milli-Q water. After drying, 1 ml of deionised water was added to each dish to moisten the filter paper. The test was performed in the dark at 20 ± 1 °C and for a period of 1 and 3 d. At least ten replicates per treatment for each assay, consisting of one worm per dish, were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman grade 1 »