The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using model 1261

1

Bromatological Analysis of Fish Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bromatological analyses of the experimental diets, fish carcasses and feces were performed following the Association of Official Analytical Chemists procedures [19 ]. Briefly, dry matter was determined by drying samples at 105 °C in an oven until constant weight; ash by incineration at 450 °C for 16 h in a muffle furnace; crude protein content (N × 6.25) by the Kjeldahl method after acid digestion using a Kjeltec digestion and distillation unit (model 1015 and 1026, Tecator Systems, Höganäs, Sweden, respectively); lipid content by petroleum ether extraction (Soxtec HT System, GeminiBV, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands); and gross energy, by direct combustion in an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (PARR model 1261, PARR Instruments, Moline, IL, USA). Yttrium oxide was determined as follows: sample digestion with HNO3 + H2O2 + HF in a microwave, dilution and analysis on an ICP-SFMS (ElementTM 2 ICP-SFMS, ThermoFisher ScientificTM, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Feces were analyzed for protein, lipids, energy and yttrium oxide (Y2O3) contents. Apparent digestibility coefficients (ADC) were calculated according to the following formula: ADCnutrient = 100 − [100 × (Y2O3 diet/Y2O3 feces) × (nutrient feces/nutrient diet)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analytical Procedures for Dietary Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of the ingredient mixture, SSF products, diets, feces, and whole fish was determined following the standard procedures of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [39 ]. Briefly, dry matter (DM) was determined by drying overnight or until a constant weight at 105 °C and ash by incineration in a muffle furnace at 450 °C for 16 h. Crude protein (N×6.25) was analyzed via the Kjeldahl method using a Kjeltec digestion and distillation unit (Tecator Systems, Höganäs, Sweden; models 1015 and 1026, respectively). Crude lipids were determined via extraction with petroleum ether using a Soxtec HT System (Tecator, Höganäs, Sweden). Gross energy was analyzed via combustion in an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (PARR Instruments, Moline, IL, USA; PARR model 1261). Chromium oxide content in the diets and feces was quantified using acid digestion, according to Bolin et al. [40 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analytical Methods for Diet Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical analyses of the diets were performed following the Association of Official Analytical Chemists methods (29) . Energy content was determined by direct combustion in an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (PARR model 1261; PARR Instruments) and starch content was analysed according to Beutler (30) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Net Energy Intake in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cumulative food intake, mice that received the same AAV were housed 4 mice/cage, and the amounts of diet consumed each week were recorded. Broken up food crumbs that fell onto the cage bottoms were recovered, weighed, and subtracted from the food intake calculation to increase accuracy of the measurement. In a separate experiment, after 5-week diet feeding, before differences in body weight appeared, mice were individually housed for 48 h during which body weights and food weights were recorded at time 0, 24, and 48 h. Broken up food crumbs were recovered and subtracted from the food consumption calculation. Feces were collected and weighed at the end of 48 h. Energy content of food and feces was determined using a bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instruments, Moline, IL) as previously described112 (link). Samples were dried and the energy content of the dried samples were measured in duplicate and then averaged. Net energy intake of each mouse, expressed as kcal/day), was calculated as [daily food consumption (g/day)* energy content of diet (4.782 kcal/g)] − [fecal weight (g/day)* energy content of feces (kcal/g)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proximate Composition and Caloric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proximate composition such as crude fat, crude protein, moisture and collagen contents in the cuts were analyzed using a Food Scan Lab 78810 (Foss Tecator Co., Ltd., Hillerod, Denmark) according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2006 ). To determine calories, the sample was homogenized in a blender (HMF 3160S, Hanil Co., Seoul, Korea), and then the homogenate was used for caloric measurement with a calorimeter (model 1261, Parr instrument, Moline, IL, USA). Calories were expressed as cal/g of the sample. Cholesterol content was determined according to the method of Rhee et al. (1982) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nutrient Digestibility in Chickens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three birds per pen were transferred to metabolic cage to conduct the trial in nutrient digestibility. The chickens were fed diets with chromic oxide (0.25%) added for the last 10 days (adaptive and collective periods) of each phase to determine the apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter (DM), gross energy (GE), crude protein (CP) and Cu. The excreta samples per replicate were collected into stainless steel trays and then dried in a forced-air oven at 60°C for 72 hours, grounded in a Wiley Mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) using a 1-mm screen, and used for chemical analysis. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate for DM (Method 930.15) and CP (Method 990.03), according to the methods of AOAC [31 ]. The Cu in the feed, and excreta was determined by inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP) according to the methods of AOAC [31 ]. The GE of the diets and excreta were measured using a bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instrument, Molin, IL, USA), and the chromium concentrations were determined with an automated spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) according to the procedure described by Fenton and Fenton [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proximate Composition and Calories of Horse Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proximate composition such as moisture, carbohydrate, protein, fat, and ash
contents in the horse meat were investigated using a Food Scan Lab 78810 (Foss
Tecator Co., Ltd., Hillerod, Denmark) following the method of the Association of
Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2002 ).
To establish the calories, the horse meat was homogenized in a blender (HMF
3160S, Hanil Co., Seoul, Korea), and then the homogenate was used for caloric
measurements using a calorimeter (model 1261, Parr instrument, Moline, IL, USA).
Calories were showed as kcal/100 g of the horse meat. Cholesterol content was
established according to the method described by Rhee et al. (1982) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nutrient Digestibility Assessment in Pigs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of Phase 1 and Phase 2, the nutrient digestibility test was performed
to determine the apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM), gross energy (GE),
and crude protein (CP). The two selected pigs were placed in individual cages
(one pig per cage) on day 7 in phase 1 and on day 28 in phase 2 to collect fecal
samples. A 2.5 g kg−1 chromium oxide (indigestible marker) was
added to the diet of the selected pigs. Fecal samples were collected from days
12 to 14 in phase 1 and from days 26 to 28 in phase 2. The drying (60°C,
72 h) process was performed directly after sample collection in a forced
air-drying oven and then powdered with a mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill, Thomas
Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) using a 1 mm screen. Diet and feces analyses of
DM and CP were conducted using the AOAC [25 ] method. A bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instrument, Moline,
IL, USA) and a spectrophotometer (Jasco V-650, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) were used to
determine the Cr2O3 concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Digestibility Assessment of Gestating Swine Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromic oxide (0.25%) was added into each diet from day 104 to 112 of gestation as an inert indigestible indicator to measure the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients. Fecal samples were harvested from the floor during the last four days of gestation to measure the ATTD of DM; GE; CP; NDF; and ADF. The samples were mixed within the pen and dried in a forced-air drying oven at 60 °C for 72 h, and ground in a Wiley mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley Mill, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) using a 1-mm screen and used for chemical analysis. Experimental diets and excreta samples were analyzed in triplicate for DM (Method 930.15), CP (Method 990.03), and ADF (Method 973.18) according to AOAC [50 ]. The gross energy of the diets and feces was measured by a bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL), and chromium concentrations were determined with an automated spectrophotometer (Jasco V-650, Jasco Corp., Tokyo, Japan) according to the procedure of Fenton and Fenton [51 (link)]. This is an improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. The NDF was determined gravimetrically with exposure of samples to neutral detergent, amylase, and sodium sulfite, then filtration of samples on a 1.5-µm glass filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Nutritional Analysis of Barley and Rye

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the 48 h collection period, excreta from both experiments were frozen immediately after collection and subsequently freeze-dried, weighed, and ground in a coffee grinder for homogenization. Diet and excreta samples were analyzed for gross energy at the University of Illinois using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instruments, Moline, IL) that was standardized using benzoic acid. Diet samples were also analyzed for dry matter (Method 934.01; AOAC International, 2007 ). Analysis for total nitrogen via combustion (Method 990.03; AOAC International, 2007 ) for diet and excreta was performed at the Experiment Station Laboratories, University of Missouri-Columbia. Further analyses of the barley and rye were also conducted at the University of Missouri-Columbia (Methods 990.03, 934.01, 920.39, 978.10, 942.05, and 991.43 [AOAC International, 2007] for crude protein, moisture, crude fat, crude fiber, ash, and total, soluble, and insoluble dietary fiber, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!