The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

56 protocols using summit 4

1

Monocyte Phenotypic Validation by Flow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenotypic validation of monocytes isolated from healthy donors was performed by flow cytometry analysis using the PE‐conjugated anti‐CD14 mouse monoclonal antibody TÜK4 (Miltenyi Biotec, SAS, Paris, France), the FITC‐conjugated anti‐CD3 mouse monoclonal antibody UCHT1 (Becton Dickinson France, SAS, Le Pont de Claix, France) and the PE‐conjugated anti‐CD19 mouse monoclonal antibody J3.119 (Beckman Coulter France, SAS, Villepinte, France). All FACS analyses were performed using a Cyan ADP flow cytometer equipped with Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter France, SAS, Villepinte, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Endothelial and Cardiomyocyte Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis of endothelial and cardiomyocyte oxidative stress and IL-36R was performed as previously described (15 (link)). Briefly, hearts were collagenase-digested to obtain single-cell suspensions. Cells were incubated with antibodies: anti-DNA/RNA damage (1:100 dilution, Abcam), anti-IL-36R (1:100 dilution, R & D Systems; Alexa-647 secondary, 1:100 dilution, Biolegend), anti-CD31 (1:100 dilution, Biolegend), anti-cTnT (1:100 dilution, Miltenyi Biotec), and Zombie dye (1:500 dilution, Biolegend), along with appropriate IgG controls. Flow cytometry using a CyAn™ ADP instrument (Beckman Coulter, USA) captured 250,000 events per sample. Data analysis was performed with Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Mitochondrial ROS in hPSC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine mitochondrial ROS production, hPSC were dissociated using TrypLE Select, centrifuged at 300g, incubated in mTeSR1™ with the MitoSOX Red superoxide indicator (1 μM, Invitrogen) for 20 min at 37°C, counterstained with 300 nM DAPI, and washed twice with PBS. Cells were then run on a Beckman Coulter CyAn analyzer (Beckman Coulter), where a minimum of ten thousand live cell events were acquired using DAPI gating for each sample. Flow density plots were generated using Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter). Mean log10 fluorescence data values were recorded and normalized for the statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of SP and non-SP Cell Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SP- and non-SP-cell fractions were identified and isolated using a modified protocol described by Goodell et al (16 (link)). Briefly, 1×106/ml cells were re-suspended in D-MEM containing 2% fetal bovine serum and labeled with H33342 (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) at a concentration of 2.5 μg/ml for 60 min in 37°C water bath, either alone or with 225 μM verapamil hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH). After 60 min the cells were centrifuged (300 g, 4°C) for 5 min, and then resuspended in ice-cold PBS containing 2% fetal bovine serum. The cells were passed through a 40-μm mesh filter and maintained at 4°C in the dark until flow cytometry analysis or sorting. Cells were counter-stained with 10 μg/ml propidium iodide to label dead cells, and the entire preparation was then analyzed using a BD-LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) and FlowJo software (Treestar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA), or sorted using a MoFlo cell sorter with the Summit 4.3 software (Beckmann Coulter GmbH, Krefeld, Germany). Hoechst dye was excited at 355 nm (32 (link)), and fluorescence was measured at two wavelengths using a 450/50-nm (blue) band-pass filter and a 670/30-nm (33 (link)) long-pass edge filter. Following isolation the SP and non-SP cell fractions were used for in vitro and in vivo assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunophenotypic Characterization of Enteric Nervous System Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was performed on ENSc at time of isolation (T0) and after 7-day culture (T7) using the primary antibodies reported in Table 1. In parallel, controls were stained using only corresponding secondary or isotypic antibodies. Data were acquired using FACSCanto II Flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Josè, CA, USA) and FACSDiva v6.1.3 software (BD Biosciences). The positive expression of each target marker was established using the overton subtraction tool of Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, CA, USA).

Primary and secondary antibodies used for the immunophenotypical characterization of ENS cells

Primary antibodiesManufacturing company
Mouse anti-rat NG2 FITCSanta Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Goat anti-rat Nanog PEBD Biosciences
Mouse anti-rat CD34 PECy7BD Biosciences
Rabbit anti-rat Sox2Millipore
Rabbit anti-rat Sox10Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Rabbit anti-rat TLR4Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Goat anti-rat Frizzled 9Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Mouse anti-rat NestinMillipore
Mouse anti-rat GFAPMillipore
Mouse anti-rat PAN neuronalMillipore
Rabbit anti-rat p75Millipore
Secondary antibodies
Goat anti-mouse FITCSanta Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Goat anti-rabbit FITCSanta Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Bovine anti-goat FITCSanta Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
Donkey anti-goat PESanta Cruz Biotechnology, Inc
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Intracellular Protein Staining in ESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular staining was performed using BD transcription factors staining kit (BD), according to the manufacturer instructions with modifications. In brief, cells (1 × 106/tube) were incubated with BD Horizon fixable viability dye450 (1:1000) diluted in PBS (4 °C, 25 min). Cells were rinsed in PBS, resuspended in fixation buffer (4 °C, 45 min), and washed with ice-cold permeabilization/washing buffer. Fixed cells were incubated with primary antibodies (see supplementary table 1), diluted in permeabilization/washing buffer, overnight at 4 °C. The following day, cells were washed in permeabilization/washing buffer and incubated in secondary antibody (anti mouse-APC,1:500, Santa Cruz), for 45 minutes. After 3x washes in permeabilization buffer, cells were resuspended in ice-cold 500ul running flow buffer consisting of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.5 mM EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in PBS. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using Beckman-Coulter CyAn analyzer (Beckman-Coulter), Summit 4.3 software (Beckman-Coulter) and Flowlogic software (Inivai technologies). Single cells were gated based on forward-side scatter profiles and dead cells excluded using violet Horizon viability dye (data not shown). Undifferentiated ESCs were used as a negative control to set gates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometry Analysis of S. pombe and HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. pombe DNA content and cell size were measured by flow cytometry as previously described (Costello et al., 1986 (link)). Samples were sonicated and 30,000 events processed using a Beckman Coulter Cyan ADP instrument with 488 nm excitation detection filter and 530/40 nm bandpass. HeLa cells were fixed drop-wise with 70% ethanol and 5000 events processed as above. Data were analysed using Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing microRNA-induced Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BC cell lines were transiently transfected with reagent only (mock), miR-control, miR-145-5p, miR- 145- 3p, siRNA-control, or si-UHRF1 at 10 nM in 6 well tissue culture plates, as described previously [14 (link), 17 (link)–19 (link)]. Cells were harvested by trypsinization 72 hours after transfection and washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline. For apoptosis assays, double staining with FITC-Annexin V and propidium iodide was carried out using a FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations and analysed within 1 hour by flow cytometry (CyAn ADP analyzer; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Cells were identified as viable cells, dead cells, early apoptotic cells, and apoptotic cells using Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter), and the percentages of early apoptotic and apoptotic cells from each experiment were then compared. As a positive control, we used 2 μg/mL cycloheximide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Cycle Analysis of Drug-Treated Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCCLM3 and MDA-MB 231 cells were seeded (0.5–0.6 × 106) overnight in culture cell dishes (60 mm) followed by specified drug (PJM) treatment at 24, 48, and 72 hrs time interval. The treated/untreated cells were harvested, fixed via ethanol (70%) for half an hrs at + 4 °C and stored at −20 °C until required further. The ethanol-fixed cells were then washed following centrifugation and resuspended in 0.5 ml 1X PBS containing 1 μl/ml RNase A (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham: U.S.A) and 7 μl/sample PI (Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas: U.S.A). After placing the test samples in dark for 15 to 20 min, they were filtered and the cell distribution was investigated in various phases of cell-cycle through LSRFortessaTM flow cytometer (BD-Biosciences, San Diego: U.S.A) and Summit-4.3 software (Beckman-Coulter, Inc.). All samples to be tested were analyzed within 1 hr of PI staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Cycle Analysis of Breast Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10A cells were seeded in duplicate at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 24 h before drug treatment. After that, cells were exposed to the indicated drug concentrations for 12, 24, and 48 h to analyze cell cycle distribution. The treated cells were harvested by trypsinization followed by washing with PBS buffer and centrifugation at 4°C for 5 min at 200 × g. After overnight incubation at 4°C of fixed cells in chilled absolute ethanol, centrifugation was performed at 300 × g for 5 min and 1 ml of 1× PBS was used for re-suspension of pellet. 0.5 ml of RNase A was then applied to re-suspended cells for 20 min and subsequently stained with 1 mM PI at 37°C for 15 min. DNA content in a cell population was measured by flow cytometry (BD LSRFortessaTM cell analyzer, United States) and cell cycle distribution was analyzed with Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!