The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using starch

1

Inorganic Anion Solution Preparation and TA/2-HTA Dosing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KOH, KI, I2, KHCO3, KCl, KNO3, KH2PO4, K2HPO4, and K2SO4 were purchased from VWR International (USA). Stock solutions of inorganic anions (0.1 M) were prepared in deionized (DI) water for carbonate. The starch solution was prepared by adding 0.5 g of starch (VWR International) in 100 mL of boiling DI water and mixing until complete dissolution. After 12 h settling, the supernatant was collected. TA (0.5 mM) and 2-HTA (0.125 mM) solutions were prepared by dosing 16.72 mg of TA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 4.69 mg of 2-HTA (Sigma-Aldrich) in 200 mL of DI water, adjusting pH to 7.9 with KOH, and mixing on a magnetic stir plate overnight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

α-Amylase Inhibition Assay with HI Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four filter discs with a diameter of 0.5 cm were placed in a 92 × 16 mm Petri dish (Sarstedt, Nuernbrecht, Germany) filled with medium comprising 1% agar–agar (Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 1% starch (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, 80 µL of HI extract at concentrations of 0–10 mg/mL was mixed with 20 µL α-amylase (derived from porcine pancreas, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). Acarbose was utilized as a reference inhibitor. A total of 20 μL of each sample was pipetted onto filter discs and left at 37 °C overnight. After removing the filter discs, plates were incubated with 5 mM iodine in 3% potassium iodide solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). After 15 min, the diameters of the cleared zones were evaluated and the percentage inhibition of α-amylase was calculated. The disc assay was performed on two independent testing days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lignite Characterization from Choa Saiden Shah

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lignite was collected
from Choa Saiden Shah Coal Mines, Chakwal (Pakistan).
All the chemicals used in this experiment were of reagent grade. The
urea, boric acid, starch, and PVA were purchased from VWR International
(USA), and C-SRF was purchased from Fatima Fertilizer Limited, Pakistan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Colorimetric Assay of Food Additives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals such as ascorbic acid, sodium nitrite, glucose, citric acid, potassium iodide, potassium iodate were obtained from VWR Life Science (Randor, PA, USA). The pH indicators such as phenol red, bromophenol blue, chlorophenol red, and bromocrescol green were purchased from BDH-VWR Analytical (Randor, PA, USA). Enzymes such as glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase were procured from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Indicators such as Griess reagent, starch, phenolphthalein, and guaiacol were obtained from VWR Life Science (Randor, PA, USA). Lactaid capsules were purchased from Amazon, USA. Whatman filter paper No.1 (11 µm pore diameter) was provided from Bio rad Laboratories, USA. Distilled water used for experimentation was obtained from a Milli-Q water purifier.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

α-Amylase Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The α-amylase disc assay was conducted according to (Correia et al., 2004 (link)) with minor modifications. Root extracts were diluted 1:4, 1:16 and 1:64 with ultrapure water (Purelab Flex, ELGA Veolia, United Kingdom). 80 µl of these dilutions or, as control, ultrapure water was mixed with 20 µl porcine pancreatic α-amylase (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) (20 mg/ml 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.9). Acarbose added at concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 mM was used as a reference inhibitor. Four filter discs (diameter of 0.5 cm) were placed on Petri plates (92 × 16 mm, Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) filled with medium containing 1% agar-agar (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 1% starch (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany). 20 µl of the mixtures were given onto a filter disc and the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. After removing the filter discs, 5 mL of iodine stain solution (5 mM iodine in 3% potassium iodide solution, both chemicals from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were added to each plate. Following 15 min incubation excess iodine stain was drained, before the diameter of the cleared zones was measured. The percentage inhibition of α-amylase at each extract concentration was calculated by using the following equation: Inhibition(%)=(1Diameter of sampleDiameter of control)×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Analysis of Raw-Re Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the reagents were of an analytical grade or better. The de-ionized water was used in all the experiments. The raw-Re nanostructures were obtained from the precursor solution of ammonium perrhenate(vii) (NH4ReO4), which contains 2000 mg L−1 of Re(vii) ions. The reagents for the determination of the selected RNS and ROS were purchased from Hanna Instruments (Salaj, Romania) and Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), respectively. The reagents used for ROS determination were: (i) potassium iodide, (ii) starch, and (iii) agar, and they were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials (Gliwice, Poland), Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), and BTL (Lodz, Poland), respectively. The 4-NP and NaBH4 (MERCK, Branch Poland) used for the catalytic hydrogenation were applied as received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Photocrosslinkable Chitosan-Based Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chitosan (low molecular weight 50,000–190,000 Da; deacetylation degree 75–85%), diacrylate poly(ethylene glycol) (crosslinker, Mn = 700 g/mol), 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropiophenone (photoinitiator, d = 1.077 g/mol, 97%, Mw = 164.2 g/mol) and L-aspartic acid (≥98%) were purchased in Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Starch (natural potato-Starch) was bought in Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A. (Gliwice, Poland). All reagents were applied without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STZ (Streptozotocin) and 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) (Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), α-amylase (Blulux Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Faridaban, India), Acarbose (Bayer, Germany), Aluminum chloride, sodium carbonate, sodium nitrate, starch, sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate, disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate (BDH Laboratory Supplies Ltd, England), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazine (DPPH), Galic acid, qurcetin and Folin-Ciocalteu's reagent (Sigm Chemicals Co, St. Louis, MO, USA), glibenclamide (Sanof–Aventis, USA) and glucose (Munchen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen Polymer Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paracetamol, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Mw 89,000-98,000, 99+% hydrolysed), polyethylene oxide (PEO) Mw 100,000 Da, PEO Mw 200,000 Da, poly (ethylene) glycol (PEG) Mw 4000 Da, and PEG Mw 30,000 Da were purchased from Sigma Aldrich UK. Ibuprofen was supplied by BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Starch was obtained from BDH Chemicals (Poole, England). Sodium Starch glycolate was purchased from Shin-Etsu (Tokyo, Japan). Croscarmellose sodium was acquired from FMC Europe N.V. (Brussels, Belgium). Sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) was supplied by Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Beerse, Belgium). Freeze dried strawberry powder was purchased from Healthy Suppliers (Hove, UK). Solvents were analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!