The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Torrent suite software v 5

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Torrent Suite Software v.5.0 is a software application designed for the analysis and management of data generated by Thermo Fisher Scientific's Ion Torrent sequencing platform. The software provides tools for base calling, sequence alignment, and variant calling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using torrent suite software v 5

1

Molecular Profiling of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acids were isolated from EUS-FNA pancreatic cyst fluid specimens that were collected into a DNA/RNA preservation solution. DNA and mRNA were isolated using the MagNA Pure Compact instrument (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Extracted DNA and RNA was quantitated on the Glomax Discover using the QuantiFluor ONE dsDNA System and the QuantiFluor RNA system, respectively (Promega, Madison, WI). NGS libraries of genes summarized within the Supplementary Data were created from 10 ng of DNA and 10 ng of RNA using the Ion AmpliSeq Library kit PLUS and Ion Xpress Barcode Adapters as previously described.22 (link), 23 (link) These genes include those implicated in pancreatic cysts and associated neoplasms and include “hot-spot” alterations, copy number alterations/loss of heterozygosity, gene fusions, gene expression alterations (KRT7, KRT20, and PGK1) and CHGA RNA expression. The libraries were normalized for template preparation on the Ion Chef and sequenced on an Ion S5 System according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The Torrent Suite Software v5.12 (ThermoFisher Scientific) and an in-house developed software Variant Explorer v2 were used for data analysis and interpretation. In parallel, one-step quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) for CEACAM5 was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Pancreatic Cysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acids were isolated from EUS-FNA pancreatic cyst fluid specimens that were collected into a DNA/RNA preservation solution. DNA and mRNA were isolated using the MagNA Pure Compact instrument (Roche). Extracted DNA and RNA were quantitated on the Glomax Discover using the QuantiFluor ONE dsDNA System and the QuantiFluor RNA system, respectively (Promega). NGS libraries of genes summarized within the Supplementary Data, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SLA/A622 were created from 10 ng of DNA and 10 ng of RNA using the Ion AmpliSeq Library kit PLUS and Ion Xpress Barcode Adapters as previously described.22 (link),23 (link) These 74 genes include those implicated in pancreatic cysts and associated neoplasms and include “hot-spot” mutations, such as KRAS, GNAS, etc., copy number alterations/loss of heterozygosity, GFs, gene expression alterations (GEAs; KRT7, KRT20, and PGK1) and CHGA RNA expression. The libraries were normalized for template preparationon the Ion Chef and sequenced on an Ion S5 System according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The Torrent Suite Software v5.12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an in-house developed software Variant Explorer v2 were used for data analysis and interpretation. In parallel, one-step quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) for CEACAM5 was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptome Analysis of Megakaryocytes and Platelets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD41+ 8N and ≥ 16N MKs were collected (23 ± 3k and 81 ± 5k, respectively) for RNA isolation (RNeasy Mini kit, Qiagen) followed by library preparation using SMARTer Stranded Total RNA Low Input Sample Prep kit (Clontech) and RNA-sequencing by Illumina HiSeq1500. The reads were aligned with STAR43 (link) to Ensembl mm10. Differential gene expression analyzed with EdgeR.44,45 (link)
Platelet RNA was isolated using TriReagent (Sigma-Aldrich). Libraries were prepared using an Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Mouse Gene Expression Kit and sequenced on Ion Proton Sequencer (Thermo Fisher).46 (link) The data were analyzed using Torrent Suite Software v5.6 (Thermo Fisher) and differential gene expression analyzed using DESeq2.47 (link) Gene ontology enrichment analysis were conducted with DAVID.48 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Identification and Characterization of Copy Number Variations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CNVs were identified by analyzing the percentages of sequencing reads per amplicon and allele frequencies of the common SNPs, using the Torrent Suite Software v5.6 (ThermoFisher Scientific) and Microsoft Excel (2010). Allele frequencies of the SNPs were obtained from the Variant Caller Files. A deletion was identified if multiple consecutive amplicons contained a lower percentage of reads than other samples, combined with loss of heterozygosity. A gain was called if multiple consecutive amplicons contained higher read percentages combined with an allelic imbalance. The coordinates of the CNVs are based on the 3′-end and the 5′-end of the amplicons that are located upstream and downstream of the amplicons with altered read counts. The CNVs were classified according to the joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) for interpretation and reporting of CNVs. 18 If parental DNA was available, it was used for SNP array to determine on which allele the CNV arose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Somatic Mutation Analysis for Precision Oncology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was carried out using Torrent Suite Software v5.0.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). First, somatic mutations were selected using the following criteria19: (1) variant allele frequency of somatic mutations in tumor tissues >4%, (2) removal of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms with a threshold allele frequency value ≥0.01 in either the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500; http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) or the Integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database (iJGVD, 20181105) (https://ijgvd.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/)24, and (3) registration of mutations as “pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants” in ClinVar25 or “oncogenic/likely oncogenic variants” in OncoKB (http://oncokb.org) databases26 using OncoKB‐annotator (accessed on 14 April 2020). In the current study, gene aberrations with evidence levels 1A‐3B registered in OncoKB were identified as candidate actionable mutations for molecular‐targeted drugs.27 Finally, all selected variants were manually inspected using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (http://www.broadinstitute.org/igv/).28
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimized Somatic Variant Calling for Ion Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary alignment of the sequencing reads to the reference genome and subsequent base calling was performed using the instrument provided Torrent Suite software v.5.0.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The Torrent Suite software pipeline was adapted in view of the highly optimized analysis parameters specific to Ion instrument data. The human genome build 19 was used for the alignment, calling and annotations of potential variant changes in the specimen. Subsequently, the generated BAM files were uploaded to the Ion Reporter Cloud. Detailed annotation of the individual variant calls was generated by the Ion Reporter v.5.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) software as shown previously.7 (link) In addition to the Ion Reporter annotation, a custom built software pipeline composed of Linux bash scripts was used to confirm the somatic variants of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion-deletion (indel) changes called by Ion Reporter. For the purposes of variant calling, we set a coverage threshold of 200X reads for SNVs and 350X reads Indels at a variant allele fraction of 5%. Anything below these limits was not called.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Somatic Mutation Detection in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing reads were mapped to the UCSC human reference genome (GRCh37), and data analysis was carried out using the Torrent Suite Software v5.0.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). First, somatic mutations were selected as follows: (1) The variant allele frequency of somatic mutations of more than 4% in tumor tissues was included; (2) single nucleotide polymorphisms were removed if they showed a threshold allele frequency of ≥ 0.01 in either the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500) (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) or the Integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database (iJGVD, 20181105) (https://ijgvd.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/)37 (link); (3) the mutations were registered as “pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants” in ClinVar38 (link) or as “oncogenic/likely oncogenic variants” in the OncoKB dataset (http://oncokb.org) (using oncokb-annotator ver 2.2.0, https://github.com/oncokb/oncokb-annotator/tree/v2.2.0) were included7 . Finally, all the selected variants were manually checked using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (http://www.broadinstitute.org/igv/)39 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Variant Identification for Oncogenic Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was carried out using the Torrent Suite Software v5.0.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We selected mutations that met the following criteria: the frequency of variant alleles was more than 4% in tumor tissues; single nucleotide polymorphisms were excluded if they showed a threshold allele frequency ≥ 0.01 in either the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Grand Opportunity Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500; http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) or the integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database (iJGVD, 20181105; https://ijgvd.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/). The variants have been registered as “pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants” in ClinVar42 (link) or “oncogenic/likely oncogenic variants” in OncoKB (http://oncokb.org) databases using the OncoKB annotator commit 8910b65 (accessed on June 29, 2019). All selected variants were validated using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV; http://www.broadinstitute.org/igv/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Identification of rG4-Enriched mRNA Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse forebrain tissues were lysed and precleared using the Protein G HP SpinTrap Kit (GE Healthcare). The precleared samples were incubated at 4°C overnight in a Protein G HP SpinTrap column that had been treated with His-tagged BG4 (or normal rabbit IgG for control) and anti-6×His. The resultant solution was washed three times with wash buffer and eluted with elution buffer. Wash buffer and elution buffer were provided with the RiboCluster Profiler RIP-Assay Kit (MBL). The BG4-bound RNA fraction was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and subjected to RNA-sequencing library preparation using the Ion Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cDNA libraries obtained were sequenced on an Ion Proton sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Data were processed using the Torrent Suite Software v.5.2.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to remove adapter sequences and low-quality ends. The Cufflinks software package was used to analyze BG4-enriched mRNAs compared with IgG-treated samples. Putative rG4-forming motifs of mRNAs were predicted using the QGRS mapper (http://bioinformatics.ramapo.edu/QGRS/index.php) and QuadBase2 (http://quadbase.igib.res.in/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA-Seq Analysis of Mouse Transcriptome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the cells as previously described. RNA samples were checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 with RNA 6000 nano kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and RNA integrity number (RIN) was calculated. The high-quality RNA (RIN > 7.2) samples were subjected to RNA sequencing using the Ion Torrent NGS system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, RNA libraries were prepared using 10.62 ng of total RNA with an Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Mouse Gene Expression kit, and sequenced on Ion Proton using an Ion PI Hi-Q Sequencing 200 kit and Ion PI Chip v3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The data were analyzed using AmpliSeqRNA plug-in v5.2.0.3 in the Torrent Suite Software v5.2.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and normalized using RPM (reads per million mapped reads) method. The normalized data were further analyzed and visualized using GeneSpring v14.9.1 software (Agilent Technologies), R Studio (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!