The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using lc 20 prominence system

1

HPLC Analysis of Polyphenol Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC analysis for apigenin (A), luteolin (L), hydroxytyrosol (HT), oleuropein (OP), A7G, and L7G was carried out using a Shimadzu Prominence LC-20 system as previously reported [22 (link)]. The HPLC column was ZORBAX SB-C18 (5 µm, φ 4.6 × 150 mm). Separation was carried out at 40 °C with a gradient elution program at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The mobile phases were 10% formic acid in water (A) and a 1:1 mixture of acetonitrile and methanol (B). The gradient program was 0–100% (B) for 40 min, followed by a re-equilibration duration of 10 min. The monitoring wavelength was configured at 280 nm for A, L, HT, and OP, while for A7G and L7G, it was set at 331 nm. The injection volume of the WOL (50 mg/mL MeOH, 0.22 µm filtration) in the HPLC system was 10 µL.
For apigenin-7-O-rutinoside (A7R) and oleuroside (OS), the analysis condition was modified somewhat. The HPLC column was a TSKgel ODS-100 V (3 µm, φ2 × 150 mm). Separation was carried out at 40 °C with a gradient elution program at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The mobile phases were 0.5% acetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The following multistep linear gradient was applied: 0 min, 5% B; 5 min, 15% B; 25 min, 30% B; 35 min, 95% B. The monitoring wavelength was 311 nm for OS and 254 nm for A7R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Polyphenol Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC analysis for apigenin (A), luteolin (L), hydroxytyrosol (HT), oleuropein (OP), A7G, and L7G was carried out using a Shimadzu Prominence LC-20 system as previously reported [22 (link)]. The HPLC column was ZORBAX SB-C18 (5 µm, φ 4.6 × 150 mm). Separation was carried out at 40 °C with a gradient elution program at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The mobile phases were 10% formic acid in water (A) and a 1:1 mixture of acetonitrile and methanol (B). The gradient program was 0–100% (B) for 40 min, followed by a re-equilibration duration of 10 min. The monitoring wavelength was configured at 280 nm for A, L, HT, and OP, while for A7G and L7G, it was set at 331 nm. The injection volume of the WOL (50 mg/mL MeOH, 0.22 µm filtration) in the HPLC system was 10 µL.
For apigenin-7-O-rutinoside (A7R) and oleuroside (OS), the analysis condition was modified somewhat. The HPLC column was a TSKgel ODS-100 V (3 µm, φ2 × 150 mm). Separation was carried out at 40 °C with a gradient elution program at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The mobile phases were 0.5% acetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The following multistep linear gradient was applied: 0 min, 5% B; 5 min, 15% B; 25 min, 30% B; 35 min, 95% B. The monitoring wavelength was 311 nm for OS and 254 nm for A7R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The system
was composed of a Shimadzu Prominence LC20 system (Shimadzu Corp.,
Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a 3200 Qtrap mass spectrometer (AB Sciex,
Ontario, Canada). The column used was a Supelco Discovery HS C18,
2.1 × 150 mm, 3 μm, and the mobile phases were A: 10% acetonitrile
in water with 0.1% formic acid and B: 100% acetonitrile with 0.1%
formic acid. The gradient elution program was at 0.15 mL/min and started
at 20% B, followed by a ramp to 100% B in 18 min and kept for 7.5
min, then reduced to 20% B in 0.5 min and kept at 20% B for 4 min.
The MS was operated in ESI+ using multiple reaction monitoring
(MRM). The collision energy was set to 50 V. Curtain gas was set to
40 and the ionization spray at +5000 V. The source temperature was
set to 450 and gases 1 and 2 were set to 20 and 15, respectively.
Declustering potential was set to 95.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-RI Determination of Compound Concentration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the determination of the concentration of the compounds, the solutions were analyzed by HPLC on a Shimadzu Prominence LC‐20 system as previously reported.[22] Two successively connected organic acid columns (CS‐Chromatography, 100 mm×8.0 mm and 300 mm×8.0 mm) were used, and the HPLC was equipped with a refractive index (RI) detector. The columns were thermostated at 40 °C, aqueous CF3COOH with a concentration of 154 μL L−1 was used as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. Measurement time was 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized HPLC-MS/MS Method for Analyte Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation was carried out using a Shimadzu Prominence LC 20 system (Duisburg, DE). A Phenomenex reversed-phase column (150 × 2.0 mm) filled with Luna Phenyl Hexyl material (5 μm particle size) was used for the separation. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/ min, and a volume of 10 µL was injected. A binary gradient consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) was applied. The best peak shape and separation was obtained with the following eluent gradient profile: start 10% B; 2 min: 10% B; 10 min: 80% B; 12 min: 80% B; 13 min: 10% B and 15 min:10% B. The temperature of the column was held at 40°C. The mass spectrometer measurements were performed on a triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer, API 4000 QTrap (AB Sciex, Darmstadt, DE) It worked with electrospray ionization in the positive mode under the scheduled multiple reaction monitoring conditions. The curtain gas was set to 20 psi, collision activated dissociation gas to medium, GS1 to 55 psi and GS2 to 50 psi. The source temperature was 600°C, and ion spray voltage was 3500 V in positive mode. For each analyte, two mass transitions were recorded, applying individually optimised MS/MS conditions (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Bound and Released DEX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amounts of bound and released DEX were quantified by reversed-phase HPLC using the Shimadzu LC-20 Prominence System (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a diode-matrix detector and Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 µm bead size; Santa Clara, CA, USA). The isocratic elution mode was applied using a mixture of acetonitrile and water (30/70, v/v). DEX elution was detected at 237 nm. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.5 mL/min, and the volume of the injection loop was 20 μL. The analysis was performed within 25 min (tR (DEX) = 21 min). Each sample was analyzed two times. The calibration plot and examples of chromatograms can be found in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S4 and S5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Separation of Multicomponent Mixtures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC was performed using a Shimadzu LC-20 Prominence system (Shimadzu, Kyoto Japan) equipped with ZORBAX Eclipse XDB C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, particle size: 5 μm) reverse-phase column for the separation of the multicomponent mixtures. The gradient elution program was as follows: 0.01–4 min, 100% A; 4–60 min, 100–25% A; 60–75 min, 25–0% A; control washing 75–120 min, 0% A. Solvent A - deionized water, solvent B - acetonitrile. The entire HPLC analysis was performed using a UV-VIS detector SPD-20A (Shimadzu, Kyoto Japan) at wavelengths of 230 and 330 nm at 17 °C provided with column oven CTO-20A (Shimadzu, Kyoto Japan) with an injection volume of 20 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC (Agilent 1260 Infinity) with diode array detector (DAD) was utilized with ZORBAX Eclipse XBD-C18 column (Analytical 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 um). With reference and slight modification to the protocol previously described22 (link), briefly, the column temperature was maintained at 30 °C with an injection volume of 10 µl. The mobile phase consisted of isocratic mixture of water (0.1%TFA) and acetonitrile (86:14) with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. The UV detector was operated at a wavelength 254 nm. The HPLC was performed on a LC-20 Prominence system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a SPD-20A UV–VIS detector using LC-Solution software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Polymer Characterization by FTIR and NMR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FTIR spectra were recorded on a Varian 3100 FTIR spectrometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. 1H, 13C, and 15N NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker DPX-400 (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) and Bruker AV-400 (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 400.13, 100.62, and 40.55 MHz, respectively, in CDCl3 and D2O. Chemical shifts are given relative to TMS (1H, 13C) and MeNO2 (15N). The 2D 1H–15N NMR spectra were recorded using the HMBC-gp 1H–15N correlation technique. The molecular weight of the polymer was determined by gel permeation chromatography using a Shimadzu LC-20 Prominence system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) fitted with a differential refractive index detector Shimadzu RID-20A and column Agilent PolyPore 7.5 mm × 300 mm (PL1113-6500) at 50 °C. N,N-Dimethylformamide solution was used as the eluent at the flow rate of 1 mL/min. Dissolution of the samples was performed at 50 °C for 24 h with stirring. The calibration was carried out using a series of polystyrene standards, Polystyrene High EasiVials (PL2010-0201), consisting of 12 samples with molecular weights from 162 to 6,570,000 g/mol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction and Quantification of Eurycomanone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried cell biomass was powdered to fine particles, 0.5 g of this powder was soaked in 10 mL methanol at 60 °C and with a shaking speed of 120 rpm for 8 h, repeating this step for three times. The extract (30 mL) was then filtered and concentrated completely at 50 °C. The precipitate was dissolved in 5 mL methanol (eurycomanone extract) and filtered through Minisart 0.2 µm membrane (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) to prepare sample for HPLC.
The HPLC analysis was carried out at ambient temperature with a C18 column (Xbridge: 5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm), flow rate: 0.8 mL/min, run time: 17.5 min, detector wavelength: 254 nm. The stationary phase was silica gel and the mobile phase was acetonitric:H2O (15:85). A 20 µL aliquot of sample was injected into the column using a Hamilton syringe. The HPLC was performed on a LC-20 Prominence system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a SPD-20A UV-VIS detector using LC-Solution software. All solvents were of analytical grade and were purchased from Merck & Co. Inc. (Darmstadt, Germany).
A standard curve of eurycomanone (Santa Cruz, CA) was used for measurement of the eurycomanone content in the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!