The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Glidescore

Manufactured by Schrödinger
Sourced in United States

GlideScore is a computational tool developed by Schrödinger for molecular modeling and drug discovery. It provides a scoring function for evaluating the binding affinity between a ligand and a protein target.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using glidescore

1

Docking and Binding Affinity Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ligands underwent docking procedures employing the extra precision mode (XP) without any constraints, and specific parameters included a van der Waals (vdw) radius scaling factor of 0.80 and a partial charge cut-off of 0.15. To estimate binding affinity and rank ligands, GlideScore, implemented in the Glide software (Maestro, version 11.8. (2018) Schrödinger, LLC, New York), was employed. The XP Pose Rank was used to identify and select the best-docked pose for each ligand. Subsequently, the final list of compounds was subjected to in-depth analysis by considering binding scores and conducting a comprehensive examination of all binding interactions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural Modeling and Ligand Docking of T. cruzi Proteasome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The homology model of T. cruzi 20S proteasome was built using ‘Prime’ protein structure prediction program (Schrödinger) and X-ray structure of bovine 20S proteasome (pdb accession code 1IRU)39 (link) as the template. The model was subjected to restrained minimization to relieve inter-chain clashes. ‘SiteMap’ program (Schrödinger) was used to identify pockets on a protein surface suitable for small molecule binding. Flexible ligand docking was performed using ‘Glide 5.8’ (Schrödinger). The grid box was centered in a middle of the identified pocket and extended by 10 Å, with outer box extending additional 20Å. The ligand was docked using the standard precision (SP) algorithm and scored using ‘GlideScore’ (Schrödinger). The GNF6702 GlideScore is equal to −8.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Docking of Ebola GP Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the commercial docking software GLIDE (Schrödinger 10.0, Portland, OR) within Schrödinger Suite 2014 that applies a two-stage scoring process to rank the best conformations and orientations of the ligand based on its interactions with the Ebola GP (PDB code, 5JQ7)(Friesner et al., 2006 (link)). Three-dimensional coordinates of the ligands and their isomeric, ionization, and tautomeric states were calculated using the LigPrep (including Ionizer) module within the Schrödinger Suite 2014 programs. The protein was prepared using the “protein preparation tool”, and the structures were minimized with Macromodel software within Schrödinger Suite 2014. A grid file (20 Å by 20 Å) encircling toremifene in the cavity of GP was generated. Conformational flexibility of the ligands was handled via an exhaustive conformational search. Initially, we used Schrödinger’s proprietary GlideScore scoring function in standard precision (SP) mode. We selected top-scored compounds to dock again in extra precision (XP) mode to score the optimized position, and used UCSF CHIMERA to view the binding positions and generate pictures(Pettersen et al., 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Modeling and Molecular Docking of IFNAR2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to molecular docking calculations, we constructed the IFNAR2 model structure using the X-ray crystallographic structure of IFNAR2 (PDB ID: 3S9D) [25 (link)]. IFN-α2 and water molecules were removed, and the protein structure was prepared using Schrödinger Protein Preparation Wizard of maestro module (Schrödinger, New York, NY, USA) [26 ]. Docking center was set to the loop that included Tyr39 and Tyr43. We used a compound library for docking simulations provided by Namiki Shoji (Tokyo, Japan). The compound library was filtered using Lipinski’s rule of five, resulting in exclusion of compounds with reactive groups and selection of approximately 300,000 compounds at random. Alternative protonation states of each compound as well as chiral forms were generated for the 7 ± 2 pH range using the LigPrep module and ionization penalties were calculated using the Epik panel (Schrödinger, NY, USA) at pH 7 [27 ]. The docking simulations were performed using GOLD with GoldScore (The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, Cambridge, UK) [28 (link)], Glide (SP mode) with GlideScore (Schrödinger, NY, USA) [29 ], and Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) Docking score (S score) (Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Canada) [30 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural Modeling and Ligand Docking of T. cruzi Proteasome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The homology model of T. cruzi 20S proteasome was built using ‘Prime’ protein structure prediction program (Schrödinger) and X-ray structure of bovine 20S proteasome (pdb accession code 1IRU)39 (link) as the template. The model was subjected to restrained minimization to relieve inter-chain clashes. ‘SiteMap’ program (Schrödinger) was used to identify pockets on a protein surface suitable for small molecule binding. Flexible ligand docking was performed using ‘Glide 5.8’ (Schrödinger). The grid box was centered in a middle of the identified pocket and extended by 10 Å, with outer box extending additional 20Å. The ligand was docked using the standard precision (SP) algorithm and scored using ‘GlideScore’ (Schrödinger). The GNF6702 GlideScore is equal to −8.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

EGFR Kinase Docking and Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computer-aided compound docking was performed with GLIDE (GlideScore version SP5.0 Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021, re. 2021-2) with standard precision, the Maestro 12.8.117 portal. The receptor grid was generated from the EGFR(T790M/V948R) kinase domain from Chain D of PDB ID 8FV4 (compound 2) with the omitted ligand using the Protein Preparation Wizard68 (link). Compound 4 was prepared with LigPrep (OPLS4 force field, Epik pH = 7.0 ± 2). The best binding poses were ranked on the basis of the lowest docking and GlideScore values69 (link),70 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BDNF Dimer Modeling and Peptide Docking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BDNF dimer model was re-constructed using the template of the X-ray structure of the BDNF/NT3 heterodimer complex (PDB: 1BND). Our approach to docking BDNF pro-peptides on the surface of mature BDNF dimer models utilized two steps that took into account several levels of structural flexibility and scoring criteria: (1) rigid-body docking of BDNF pro-peptide to identify the binding position; and (2) refinement of the BDNF pro-peptide/mature BDNF dimer model complex by re-docking with greater structural flexibility and Glide score (Schrödinger, LLC). To obtain the initial binding position of an extended BDNF pro-peptide on the surface of a mature BDNF dimer model, we used ZDOCK (ver.2.3) 16 with the option of sampling at 6-degree rotational steps. Using fast Fourier transform, ZDOCK searches for all possible binding orientations of a BDNF pro-peptide along the surface of a mature BDNF dimer model, optimizing desolvation, shape complementarity and electrostatics. To account for structural flexibility in the refinement step, the Glide Induced Fit Docking (IFD) protocol17 (Schrödinger, LLC) was utilized, followed by iteratively combining rigid-receptor docking (Glide) and protein remodeling by side chain searching and minimization (Prime) techniques. Finally, the best model was rescored according to the binding energy that was calculated using Glide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!