The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using stacking gel

1

Plasma ApoA-IV Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ad libitum–fed plasma apoA-IV protein levels were determined via Western blot analysis as described previously (24 (link)). Briefly, 20 µL 2× SDS sample buffer was added to each sample, boiled for 5 min, and then loaded onto a 10% Tris-HCl gel, with a 4% stacking gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Gels were run at a constant voltage (80 V) until the protein standards were well separated. Proteins were then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for 1 h at a constant current of 350 mA. After nonspecific binding sites on the membranes were blocked for 1 h with a 5% solution of nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween (TBS-T), membranes were then incubated with goat anti-rat/mouse apoA-IV antibodies diluted 1:12,000 overnight at 4°C. After incubation, the blots were subsequently washed with nonfat milk in TBS-T, and then incubated with either horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies or with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated rabbit anti-goat antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted 1:20,000 with 2.5% nonfat milk in TBS-T at room temperature for 30 min. Detection was achieved by using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents, Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, U.K.), and X-OMAT AR films (Kodak) were used for development and visualization of the membranes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Muscle Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscles were ground in a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen, and frozen muscle powder was placed into Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and protease inhibitors. Samples were homogenized on ice and centrifuged at 10 000 g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein content of samples was determined using the bicinchoninic acid method (Sigma‐Aldrich, Poole, UK). For assessment of specific proteins in muscle, 20 mg of total protein was applied to a 4–20% mini‐PROTEAN TGX precast gel with a 4% stacking gel (Bio‐Rad Laboratories Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK). The separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes by western blotting. Membranes were probed using antibodies against calstabin, serca1, calsequestrin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), DHPR, RYR (Thermo Scientific, USA), calcineurin, nuclear factor of activated T‐cells (NFAT), calpain (Cell Signaling, Hitchin, UK), and CuZnSod (Enzo, Farmingdale, NY, USA). Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti‐rabbit IgG or anti‐mouse IgG (Cell Signaling) was used as secondary antibody. Peroxidase activity was detected using an ECL Plus substrate (Amersham International Cardiff, UK), and band intensities were analysed using Quantity One Software (Bio‐Rad Laboratories Ltd). All protein contents were normalized to protein levels determined by the ponceau stain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biomolecule Immobilization on FPNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The possibility of directly immobilizing biomolecules on FPNPs was tested by their treatment with BSA (at the desired concentration in DI water) for 2 h at 25 °C with gentle mixing. Following immobilization of the BSA, the FPNPs were immediately immersed in DI water and incubated for 4 h to hydrolyze any unreacted NHS esters. After this time, the un-immobilized BSA was removed by centrifugation at 4000g for 30 min. TEM was employed to visualize the BSA-immobilized FPNPs. Electrophoresis, i.e., SDS-PAGE, was performed to assess the conjugation process. Electrophoresis was carried out by regular SDS-PAGE with 12% polyacrylamide gel and 5% stacking gel according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Mega-900 UV-vis spectrophotometer (SCINCO, Seoul, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SDS-PAGE Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein samples were dissolved in Milli‐Q water at 4 mg mL−1, and then diluted with 2× Laemmli buffer (Bio‐Rad, USA) with the ratio of 1:1 to a final protein concentration of 2 mg mL−1. The diluted protein samples were heated at 100 °C for 5 min (non‐reducing condition); mixed with 10% DL‐Dithiothreitol (1 m) to Laemmli buffer and heated at 100 °C for 5 min (reducing condition). Afterward, the protein marker (10 µL) and the protein samples (10 µL) were loaded in each well on the gel (12% separating gel and 5% stacking gel, from Bio‐Rad Laboratories Inc.) at 200 V for 30–40 min. The running buffer for electrophoresis (1 L) contained 3 g Tris, 14.4 g Gly, and 1 g SDS, then the pH was adjusted to 8.3. The gels were stained with Coomassie Blue Fast Staining Solution (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). Afterward, the gels were destained using distilled water for 24 h. The sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) images were analyzed using the gel imaging system (ChemiDoc XRS+, Bio‐Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!