The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti v5 fitc

1

Flow Cytometry Binding Assay for T cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For binding assays, cancer cells were detached using CellStripper (Corning) and spleen or blood was freshly harvested from a BALB/c mouse. Red blood cells were lysed from whole blood by a 13 min. incubation in red blood cell lysis buffer containing 0.155 M ammonium chloride, 0.01 M potassium hydrogen carbonate, and 0.1 mM EDTA.
Cells were washed in PBS with 2% FBS before each incubation and kept on ice throughout. First incubation was with relevant proteins with/without 0.5 mg/mL CSA (Sigma) for 30 min, followed by incubation with anti-V5 (FITC, Invitrogen) or anti-penta-HIS (Alexa Fluor 488, Qiagen) antibodies, together with anti-CD4 (GK1.5, APC/Cy7, BioLegend) and anti-CD8 (53–6.7, APC, BD Biosciences) if detecting T cells. All flow cytometry was analyzed using LSR-II, Fortessa-3, or -5 (BD Biosciences) immediately, or the next day after cell fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting Protein Expression by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All SLC46 and SLC15 expression constructs are C-terminally fused to V5 tag and in order to check their expression, transfected cells were treated with trypsin/EDTA to obtain single cell suspension. After fixation and permeabilization using FoxP3 staining buffer set (eBioscience), V5 tag was stained with anti-V5-FITC or anti-V5-Alexa647 (Invitrogen) in 1X Permeabilization buffer. LSR II (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo (Tree Star) were used for flow cytometry and analysis. Dead cells were excluded using the Live/dead fixable aqua dead cell stain kit (Invitrogen). Live, singlet cells were gated for detection of V5 tag.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nrf2 Nuclear Translocation in Lung Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) nuclear translocation in lung cells was determined by immunofluorescence technique described by Lindl and Sciutto [11 (link)]. The sections of the lung tissue prepared as mentioned above were deparaffinized and rehydrated through submersion in graded alcohols. Antigen retrieval was performed with 10 mM citrate buffer pH 6 for 5 min in a microwave oven. The antibody used for immunostaining the V5-tagged protein was anti-V5-FITC (Invitrogen), and for visualizing the endogenous protein, the cells were probed with Nrf2 antibody. The fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) conjugated anti-rabbit antibody was used as a secondary antibody. To visualize the nuclei, the cells were stained with DAPI. The fluorescent images were captured using appropriate filters in a Nikon inverted fluorescent microscope. The antibodies were achieved from Wuhan Servicebio Technology Co Ltd. (Wuhan, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of IDO2 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human 293-T-REx™ cells stably transfected with V5-tagged wild-type (wt) IDO2, R235W, or Y346X or untransfected controls (parental) were fixed in IC Fixation buffer (Invitrogen), permeabilized with 0.2% Tween-20, and stained with anti-V5-FITC (Invitrogen). Samples were gated for live cells using forward and side scatter. The samples were acquired on a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer using FACSDiva Software and analyzed using FlowJo Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying rVAR2 Binding to A549 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein binding to A549 was tested by flow cytometry. A549 cells were detached with StemPro AccutaseTM Cell Dissociation Reagent (A1110501, Gibco). Cells were incubated with a twofold dilution of V5-tagged WT or mutant rVAR2 (400–12.5 nM) for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by an incubation with 500x diluted Anti-V5 FITC (Invitrogen 46-0308) for detection. Gating strategy showing forward and side-scatter is shown in Fig S12. Samples were processed on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD) and results were analysed using FlowJoTM software (BD Life Sciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating rVAR2 Binding to Burkitt's Lymphoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Binding of rVAR2 to sporadic BL-derived cell lines was evaluated using 2×106 cells/ml incubated with his-tagged 400-1.56 nM recombinant DBL1-ID2a (rVAR2) in PBS containing 2% FBS for 30 minutes at 4°C. After a secondary incubation using a 500 times diluted anti-penta his alexa fluor 488 antibody (Qiagen), binding was analyzed using a FC500 flow cytometer (Beckmann Coulter). To test specificity of rVAR2 binding to the BL-derived cell lines, cells were stained with rVAR2 (200nM) in the presence of increasing amounts (2-fold dilution, from 200-0 μg/ml) of CSA (Sigma) and HS (Sigma). After a secondary incubation using a 500 times diluted anti-V5-FITC (Invitrogen), binding was analyzed using a FC500 flow cytometer (Beckmann Coulter). An additional specificity control was done by pre-incubating the cells with 0.5 U/ml ChAC (Sigma) for 1 hour at 37 °C. Lastly, a domain of the VAR2CSA protein known not to be involved in the binding (rDBL4) was also used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating CAR T Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine target-specific proliferation, 1 × 105 CAR T cells were labeled with 1 µM CellTraceTM Violet (Life Technology) and co-incubated with either 5 × 105 target cells or 5 × 104 human T-activator CD3/CD28 beads in a final volume of 1 mL RPMI-1640 media supplemented by 10% Hyclone FBS, for 7 days at 37 °C. Cells were then recovered and labeled with anti-human CD3-BV421 (1:100; Biolegend) and anti-V5-FITC (1:200; Invitrogen). After staining, 10 µL of CountBright beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added to the cells in 190 µL volume. The number of cells and beads were calculated following the manufacturer’s protocol.
To measure CD69 expression, cells were pelleted after a 24-h co-culture (E:T = 1:2) for flow cytometry analysis, while supernatants were collected for cytokine analysis. Cells were collected and labeled with anti-human CD69-BV605 (1:100; Biolegend). All flow cytometric analysis was done on an LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FACSDiva (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star). Cytokine production was quantified by MSD U-PLEX assays (Mesoscale Discovery) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!