The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using m mlv reverse transcription

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cell populations using an RNA Miniprep Kit (Tiangen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol as previously described (Liu et al., 2017b (link)). Then, cDNA was synthesized with M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega). mRNA transcripts were analyzed with the ABI 7300 quantitative PCR (qPCR) system using the specific primer pairs listed in Table S2. Relative expression levels were calculated and normalized to endogenous Actb.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of RNA Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cultured H295R and HFA cells and human placental tissue with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). HFA RNA and adult adrenal RNA were obtained from the HDBR tissues and a Human Total RNA Master Panel II (Clontech), respectively, and converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) via M-MLV reverse transcription according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Southampton, UK). Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed in triplicate (each sample) on a Stratagene Mx3000P thermocycler with KAPA SYBR fast qPCR master mix with 200 nM forward and reverse primers (sequences available on request). Data were analyzed in MxPro software (Stratagene, Stockport, UK). The threshold cycle value was quantified by interpolating the quantity from a standard curve made from a gel-purified amplicon. Data were normalized to GAPDH expression and presented as a proportional increase or decrease from the calibrator (placenta or adult adrenal normalized to a value of 1 for comparison).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extraction and Amplification of RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and reverse transcribed by M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega) using oligo dT primers at 42°C for 60 min. cDNAs were then subjected to 35 cycles of PCR amplification. The primer sequences are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry-based mRNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell populations were isolated by flow cytometry. Total RNAs were extracted with RNA Miniprep Kit (Tiangen Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, cDNA was synthesized with M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega). mRNA transcripts were analyzed with the ABI 7300 qPCR system using specific primer pairs as listed in Table S3. Relative expressions were calculated and normalized to endogenous Actb expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying lncRNA Expression in Sinonasal Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted and purified using standard methods (Life Technologies; RNA Easy, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega) was utilized to synthesize cDNA. 5 lncRNA expressions in sinonasal tissues were measured by qRT-PCR which was performed on the ABI 7500 qPCR system with the primer pairs listed in Table 2. The raw quantifications were normalized to the beta-actin gene values for each sample and fold changes were shown as mean ± SD in three independent experiments, each in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Silkworm Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was prepared using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, the cDNA was synthesized at 42 °C for 30 min by M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR was performed using specific primers designed to amplify the open reading frame (ORF) of genes and probable splice form of Masc, as well as to detect the sex-specific pattern of Bmdsx under different conditions. The corresponding primers for RT-PCR are shown in Supplementary Table S1. For qPCR, the reactions were run on an ABI7500 Real-Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™II (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan). The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (silkworm microarray probe ID sw22934) was used as the internal control [18 (link)]. We used the 2−ΔΔCt method to analyze data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Gene Expression in Mouse Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted from the AGM region of mouse embryos with TRNzol reagent (Tiangen) and were then reverse transcribed using M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega) to obtain cDNAs for use as qPCR templates. The qPCR assays were performed with a Bio-Rad system (CFX96), and the expression levels of gapdh for mouse embryos were used as the internal controls. The sequences of the primers used for qPCR and the lengths of the PCR products are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten pairs of hippocampal tissues were used for qRT-PCR validation. After RNA isolation, M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used to synthesize cDNA. Quantitative PCR analysis and data collection were performed on the ABI 7500 qPCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primer pairs are listed in Table 1. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method, and fold changes are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. U6 and β-actin were used as references.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Differential Expression Analysis of lncRNAs and mRNAs in Atherosclerosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
QRT-PCR was performed to verify the differential expression of lncRNAs and mRNAs between atherosclerotic plaque tissues of ApoE/ mice fed with a HFD for 12 weeks and normal aortic tissues. Total RNA extracted for microarray analysis was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. QRT-PCR was performed using an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and a SYBR Green kit (Takara, Dalian, China) using the primer pairs listed in Table 1. We used 18S RNA as an endogenous control for normalization. For relative quantification, 2−ΔΔCt was calculated and used as an indication of gene relative expression.

Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR

Gene symbolForwardReverse
Cldn1ATCCACAGTCCCTCGTAGGGTTTCATCCTGGCTTCT
Ccl8ATACCCTGCTTGGTCTGGGCTCATAGCTGTCCCTGTC
Spp1ACCATGCAGAGAGCGAGGATTGGGACATCGACTGTAGGGACG
Traf3TCCGAGGTATCCACTATGATGTCGCCCAAACTGTTCT
FasTTCGTGAAACTGATAAAAACTGCTCTGATGGTCTCCAAAATGCT
mapk3GGCTTTCTGACGGAGTATGTGGCTGGTCCAGGTAGTGCTTGCCG
NONMMUT000151GCATCAATAGTCCCAGTAAGATGGAGGTCTGGTTTGT
NONMMUT042398GATCACTACAGCCTCCTCCTGGTAAATCAGGCAACT
Gm13241TTTGAAACCTCCTCCCTAATGCCCAGTGGTGTATTT
NONMMUT019491ACCCTGCTTCTATTCCACGTAGGCAAACACCCAGAC
NONMMUT001754CGAAATGAAGCGTAGTGTTTGACAACCAGGAATAGC
NONMMUT051707AACTAGGCTCACTGAATAAATGTAACTGGGAAGGAAGA
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Virus Detection in Taro and Banana Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from taro leaf samples in RNAlater® using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit and synthesis of cDNA was performed using M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega, United States; Wang et al., 2017 (link)). A universal potyvirus-specific ELISA (Agdia Inc., USA) and a universal potyvirus-specific RT-PCR (Zheng et al., 2010 (link)) were used to test two samples with feathery mottling and distorted leaves, and one asymptomatic sample. RT-PCR with dasheen mosaic virus (DsMV) CI-specific primers and a DsMV-specific triple-antibody sandwich ELISA (Agdia Inc., United States; Wang et al., 2017 (link)) were used to confirm DsMV in taro leaf samples.
We used the CTAB method to isolate total DNA from 100 mg banana leaf samples with banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) symptoms kept in RNAlater® using CTAB method and were tested by PCR using BBTV-Rep gene-specific primers and CP-specific primers BBTV-HAF1 and BBTV-HAR1 (Hamim et al., 2017 (link)). Six samples were also tested for BBTV using a BBTV-specific antibody in a triple-antibody sandwich-ELISA (Agdia, Elkhart, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!