The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas system for windows

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States, Cameroon, Japan

The SAS System for Windows is a comprehensive software suite for data analysis, management, and reporting. It provides a powerful platform for statistical analysis, data mining, and business intelligence. The SAS System for Windows includes a wide range of tools and functionalities to help users effectively manage and analyze their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

237 protocols using sas system for windows

1

FCCP Concentration-Response and Glucose Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration-response curve for FCCP (experiment 1) was performed by nonlinear regression using the software GraphPad Prism 6. Data relating to the measurement of ATP levels and computerized analysis of sperm kinetics (experiments 2 and 3, resp.) were analyzed using the SAS System for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Thus, the interaction between FCCP and glucose factors was determined by PROC GLM. Differences between treatments were assessed using parametric (Student's t-test for each factor separately or LSD test for the combination of factors) and nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon) in accordance with the normality of the residuals (Gaussian distribution) and homogeneity of the variances. To analyze the effect of FCCP in the presence or absence of glucose in the ROS production, data normalized to the control group were compared by ANOVA variance analysis (LSD test) using the SAS System for Windows program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The level of significance to reject the H0 (null hypothesis) was 5%; that is, the significance level was 0.05. Significant differences between classificatory variables (treatments) and a specific response variable were considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Urinary Function in Uterine Fibroids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample size was predetermined based on our previously reported study that enrolled both women with and without UF-LUTS.8 (link) Statistical analyses were computed using SAS software, version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics were computed for participant characteristics and questionnaire scores. Case and control participants were matched 1:1 on key variables, therefore paired-samples two-tailed t-tests were used to compare LPA and PR length at rest, during contraction, and excursion during bearing down. Assumptions were checked graphically with histograms and quartile-to-quartile plots and statistically with the Shapiro Wilk test. Where t-test assumptions were violated, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests are reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating RA Risk from Air Pollution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We demonstrated the demographic distribution and calculated the quartile of the PM2.5 and PM10 yearly mean concentrations of all study subjects and RA patients. We assessed the incidence among study population who had at least one-year air pollution follow-up exposure before with RA diagnosis. We calculated the RA incidence rates per 10,000 person-years exposed to each quartile of PM2.5 or PM10 concentrations or RH. We executed hazards regression analysis to predict the risk of RA in people exposed to each quartile of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. Finally, the hazard ratios of RA were analyzed between participants exposed to annual average concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10. All the hazard ratios of RA were stratified by gender and adjusted for age and RH. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the SAS statistical package (SAS System for Windows, Version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Capsule vs. Upper GI Endoscopy for Variceal Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed to assess sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of capsule endoscopy versus upper GI endoscopy in determining the need for prophylaxis or treatment. A weighted κ scale was used to determine agreement of variceal grade by capsule endoscopy compared to upper GI endoscopy, using upper GI endoscopy as the gold standard. Results are expressed as frequency and percentage as appropriate. Cases with missing data for any particular measurement were omitted from analyses involving that measurement. The data analysis was generated using SAS software, version 9.1.3 of the SAS System for Windows (copyright 2007 SAS Institute Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cognitive Impairment and Physical Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline characteristics were described using means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables. A chi-square test and t-test were used to examine group differences in baseline characteristics by SPPB score. A generalized estimating equation model analysis using the GENMOD procedure in SAS was performed to estimate the odds ratio of having low physical performance (SPPB < 7) over 20-years as a function of cognitive impairment. The models used a logit link binomial distribution and an autoregressive order covariance matrix. All variables including cognitive impairment were analyzed as time varying (with the potential to change as time progressed), except for sex and education. Additional analysis was performed using the general linear mixed models MIXED procedure with an unstructured covariance matrix in SAS to estimate the average population change in SPPB over time as a continuous score as a function of cognitive impairment. These methods were chosen to account for missing or incomplete observations, as well as the modeling of time-dependent change between the variables and the modeling effects of time on the outcome. A p-value of <0.05 was set for statistical significance. SAS System for Windows (version 10; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Predictors of Survival After Spine SBRT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical factors were reported per patient and tumor factors per segment amongst each cohort. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess for potential predictors of living ≤3 mo after spine SBRT. A generalized linear mixed model with binary outcome (living ≤3 mo vs >3 yr) was used to assess the impact of patient and tumor factors per spinal segment. Predictors with P-value < .2 on univariate analysis were selected for multivariable analysis. Analyses were performed for local control, considering death as competing risk. All P-values were 2-sided, and for the statistical analyses, a P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using version 9.4 of the SAS system for Windows, 2002-2012 SAS Institute Inc (Cary, North Carolina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Analysis of Categorical and Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
It was performed a descriptive analysis with frequency tables for categorical
variables and measures of position and dispersion for continous variables. For
the comparison of proportions, it was used the chi-square test or the Fisher’s
exact test, when necessary. For the comparison of ordinal or continous measures,
it was used the Mann-Whitney test. The level of significance adopted was 5%
(p<0.05). For the performance of the analyses, it was used the software SAS
System for Windows (Statistic Analysis System), versão 9.2, SAS Institute Inc.,
2002-2008, Cary, NC, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values were expressed as the mean ± SEM. To evaluate the data, either the Student t test or the Wilcoxon test was performed for comparison between the 2 groups. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. For comparisons of mean values among the 3 groups, a 1-tailed Williams test or Shirley-Williams test was used, and a P value <0.025 was considered significant. All data were analyzed using the SAS System for Windows (Release 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Regional Disparities in Oral Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(1) Does the relation between ICON score and child oral health (measured by COHIP-SF 19) differ between regions? (2) Does this relation differ between males and females? (3) Does this relation depend on age? (4) Does the dependence of this relation on region differ between males and females? (5) Does the dependence of this relation on age differ between regions?
Note that questions 1–3 and questions 4–5 refer to two-way and three-way interactions, respectively. The caries score was right-skewed, and the assumption of linearity was—based on graphical exploration—not fulfilled in all settings. Therefore, analyses were repeated using a transformed version of the caries score which can handle the presence of zero values (inverse hyperbolic sign transformation, Burbridge et al. 1988 [13 (link)]). Since conclusions remained the same, results were only reported on untransformed values.
p-Values smaller than 0.05 were considered significant. No corrections for multiple testing were considered. Therefore, a single ‘significant’ p-value should be interpreted carefully. All analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institue Inc., North Carolina, NC, USA), version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tracking and Memory Performance in CWS and CWNS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) and SAS software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows (Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.). Data screening procedures indicated that both the tracking and memory data were non-Gaussian in nature. For this reason, generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were conducted using an exchangeable correlation matrix and a binary logistic distribution to model the dichotomous outcome of responding correctly or incorrectly to each trial. The main effects of group (CWS vs. CWNS), condition (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous), and the two-way interaction between group and condition were assessed and reported using Wald Chi-Square statistics (with 1 df using the Type III sum of squares approach, two-tailed). Chronological age was also added as a covariate to these analyses as it was moderately to highly correlated with tracking and memory accuracy in both conditions. Planned pairwise comparisons, with Bonferroni corrections applied, were used to further explore differences between means. Finally, correlational analyses between tracking and memory accuracy were conducted using Spearman’s rank partial correlation coefficients, with chronological age added as a covariate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!