The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Em ccd camera

Manufactured by Hamamatsu Photonics
Sourced in Japan, Germany

The EM-CCD camera is a highly sensitive imaging device designed for low-light applications. It utilizes an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EM-CCD) sensor to amplify the signal, enabling the detection of even the faintest of light signals. This camera is capable of capturing high-quality images and videos with exceptional clarity and resolution, making it a valuable tool for a variety of scientific and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

139 protocols using em ccd camera

1

Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy for Leg Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leg disc development was imaged using an inverted spinning disk confocal microscope (CSU-X1, Yokogawa, coupled to a Leica or Zeiss microscope) mounted with 20×/0.8 multi-immersion 40×/1.2 oil or 20×/0.8 air objectives and equipped with 488 nm and 561 nm LEDs and a piezo stage. Images were acquired over time with an EMCCD camera (Hamamatsu) controlled by the Metamorph or Zen software, at a rate of one z-stack every 5 to 15 min. Images were processed with the ImageJ software for registration (StackReg plug-in from Thévenaz and co-workers, EPFL, Switzerland), bleaching correction by histogram matching (Bleach Correction plug-in from Miura, EMBL, Germany), stitching (Pairwise Stitching plug-in Preibisch et al., 2009 (link), background correction and smoothing. The length of the PE and that of the leg (Fig. 1C and Fig. S1) were measured on image z-stacks, from the dorsal tip to the distal pole (PE) and from the femur to the distal pole (leg), respectively, as indicated in Fig. 1B. The occurrence time of a particular event (Fig. 1D) was defined as the first timepoint when the event was visible.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Phagolysosome Dynamics in RPE Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phagolysosomes were stained and imaged as previously described19 (link). Freshly dissected posterior eyecups were incubated at 37 °C for 15 minutes in DMEM (11995-065, Gibco) with 0.4 µM LysoTrackerTM Red DND-99 (L7528, Molecular Probes) to label acidified phagolysosomes and 5 µM 4′,6-Diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) to stain nuclei. Confocal images (z-stacks, 0.3 µm steps, 30 µm in total) were captured in the central part of the RPE, using an Olympus IX-81 inverted microscope equipped with a Yokagawa CSU X1 spinning disk confocal scan-head, a Hamamatsu EMCCD camera (C9100-13). The volume occupied by phagolysosomes inside individual RPE cells was calculated using Volocity™ software (version 6.3, PerkinElmer). RPE cells were imaged from 8 independent experiments (4 WT and 4 TG animals) and a total of 13 microscope fields per group (3–4 images per animal), representing 297 and 331 RPE cells from WT and TG animals respectively, for final analysis. Mann-Whitney U-test (one-tailed) was used; significance was set to P ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative FRAP Analysis of CFP1 Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FRAP experiments were performed on an UltraView spinning disk microscope (Perkin Elmer) equipped with an EM-CCD camera (Hamamatsu) using a 60x/1.4NA oil objective. 50 pre-bleach and 1,000 post-bleach images were captured at a rate of 8 frames per second (fps) (Figures 1B and C) after bleaching a circular diffraction limited spot of ∼2.5 μm diameter using a 488-nm laser line at 100% transmission. Alternatively, to capture the rapid recovery of the P/C/S mutant effectively, we used an acquisition rate of 13 fps (Figures 1E and F). FRAP curves were calculated in MATLAB, normalizing for the initial conditions (brightness of the cell and brightness of the spot) and corrected for acquisition photobleaching over time (Mueller et al., 2012 (link)). Half recovery times (t1/2) were calculated using a biexponential fit. Briefly, this involved deriving t1/2 values from individual cells (Figures S1F and S1G) and then collecting the distribution of t1/2 values across biological triplicates for the same transgene (Figures S1H and S1I). To compare the dynamics of individual GFP-CFP1 transgenes, a Student’s t test was then used to calculate the probability (p) that there was no difference between the wild-type and mutant versions of CFP1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intravital Imaging of Muscle Microvasculature

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were subjected to sciatic nerve transection and exposure of the ipsilateral gastrocnemius muscle under anesthesia with isoflurane; inhaled anesthesia was maintained throughout the subsequent intravital imaging experiment. Mouse body temperature was maintained using a heating pad. Gastrocnemius muscle intravital imaging experiments were performed using a spinning-disk confocal microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 basic stand inverted scope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU-X spinning disk unit and an EMCCD camera [Hamamatsu]). Samples were excited with 488-nm and 633-nm laser lines, and emission was collected using a 10×/0.3 and 25×/0.8 objective with standard emission filter sets (Semrock). Images were acquired using ZEN acquisition software (Zeiss). The muscle microvasculature was visualized by intravenous infusion of 5 µg of anti-PECAM-1. Neutrophils inside the muscle microvasculature and tissue were visualized via topical application of fluorescently labeled anti-Ly6G (1A8) antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Yeast Cell Imaging with Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast cells were imaged with a Yokogawa spinning-disc confocal microscope equipped with Nikon PlanApo 100X/1.45NA or ApoTIRF 60X/1.49NA objective lens and a Hamamatsu cooled back-thinned CCD-camera or EM-CCD camera 46 (link). Cells were grown overnight to OD ~0.5, then placed between 2% agarose YE5S pad and glass coverslip for imaging. Images were acquired at ~20°C and processed with MetaMorph 7.7 (www.MolecularDevices.com). Precise details of imaging conditions are provided for each figure below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Single-molecule microscopy for tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For single-molecule microscopy, a Nikon Eclipse Ti with a TIRF objective (× 100, Apo, NA: 1.49) was used. Image acquisition was accomplished using a back-illuminated EMCCD camera (Hamamatsu). The center of a 20-fold expanded beam from a 100-mW multiline argon laser (JDS Uniphase, laser head: 2219-G5MLS) was focused on the back focal plane and operated during image acquisition with 150 to 200 W/cm2. A 514-nm laser diode was used as excitation source. For image acquisition, the program Andor Solis 4.21 was applied. Streams of 1500 frames of 20 ms were acquired. Cells continued to grow after imaging, showing that there is little to no photo damage during acquisition. Acquired streams were loaded into Fiji ImageJ [75 (link)], and pixel sizes (106 nm) and time increments were calibrated. Tracking of single molecules was achieved using u-track 2.0 [76 (link)]. Only trajectories with at least four frames were used for further analysis to calculate the diffusion coefficients. Trajectory x/y coordinates and diffusion coefficients were calculated using a custom-made MATLAB script which included localization error. At least 1000 tracks were used for each analysis so that the CDF curves had at least 104 points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Live-Cell Confocal Imaging Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDC microscopy was performed utilizing a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope equipped with an UltraVIEW VOX confocal system (Perkin Elmer) and an EM-CCD camera (Hamamatsu) housed within a sealed chamber at 37°C. Cells in their native medium were excited using laser wavelengths of 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and/or 640 nm and fluorescence was detected by either a 100X/1.49NA apo TIRF objective (Nikon) or 60X/1.4NA Plan Apo objective (Nikon) with standard emission filters. For confocal imaging of live submerged cultures, cells were transduced and/or transfected with fluorophore-tagged constructs and then seeded into glass-bottom dishes (MatTek #P35G-1.5–20-C) at least 24 hr prior to imaging in their native medium. For imaging of live stratified cultures, organotypic epidermis was transferred from the transwell into a 35 mm glass-bottom dish with the top of the tissue against the glass. Multi-color Z stack images were acquired using a piezo motor with a step size of 200 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Confocal Imaging of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope with Zeiss ×40 and ×63 oil objectives (NA 1.3) with the appropriate filter sets and a back-thinned Hamamatsu EMCCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

3D-Printed Electrotaxis Assay Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We 3D-printed electrotaxis chambers (Figure 2—figure supplement 1) with dimensions of 20 mm × 5 mm × 0.25 mm and composed of a clear resin using a Formlabs Form2 3D-printer. Agar bridges were used to isolate cell media from electrodes to minimize electrochemical products and pH changes. Twenty V/cm constant EFs were applied. Time-lapse images of the phase-contrast channel and the RFP/GFP channel were recorded using PerkinElmer spinning-disk microscope at a frame rate of 0.1 frames/s (Yokogawa CSU-X1 spinning-disk scan head (5000 rpm)) with Hamamatsu EMCCD camera and Volocity analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Photobleaching Dynamics of ParB Foci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Escherichia coli cells (Stellar) carrying pJYB213 (ParBF‐eGfp), grown in mid‐exponential phase in MGC medium and spotted on microscope slides coated with 1% MGC‐buffered agarose, were subjected to laser‐bleaching. Each field was imaged three times (pre‐bleached step) before photobleaching (at ~2.4 s) a single ParBF focus with a 488 nm laser into two‐foci cells. ROI (region of interest) were 0.2 × 0.2 or 0.3 × 0.3 corresponding to 5 or 9 pixels, respectively. The laser power was set between 67 and 74 Hz to ensure partial bleaching, thus enabling to follow fluorescence recovery on a time scale of second right after photobleaching. Images were taken using an EMCCD camera with a 0.13 μm per pixel resolution (Hamamatsu). To follow recovery dynamics, images were taken every 5, 10, and 20 s up to 38, 108, and 169 s, respectively. Overall, photobleaching in the field of view during the time course of each FRAP experiment (green curves in Fig 6B and Appendix Fig S6A) was averaged from 15 unbleached foci from each field. Normalization to 1 was performed by averaging the focus fluorescence intensity from the three pre‐bleached images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!