The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using anti 5hmc

1

Quantification of DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from tibias using FastPure Cell/Tissue DNA Isolation Mini Kit (Vazyme, DC102-01, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Qubit Fluorometer 4.0 (Life Technology, United States) was used to quantify the DNA concentration. DNA samples were diluted with 10x NaOH and 10 mM Tris at pH 8.5 and then loaded onto a Hybond N+ nylon membrane (GE Health, RPN303B, United States) using a 96-well dot blot apparatus (Bio-Rad, United States). After hybridizing at 80°C for 2 h and being blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h at room temperature, the membrane was incubated in anti-5mC antibodies (ZYMO RESEARCH, #A3001-200, 1:5000) and anti-5hmC (Active Motif, 39,769, 1:10,000) at 4 °C overnight and visualized by chemiluminescence. To ensure equal loading, the membrane was then stained with methylene blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Intestine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissected mouse intestinal tissues were cut open along the longitude axis, washed in cold PBS, and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C before paraffin-embedding. Antigen retrieval was performed using retriever in buffer A (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-5mC (Active Motif), anti-5hmC (Active Motif), anti-Ki67 (BD Pharmingen), anti-Axin2 (Abcam), anti-Sox9 (Millipore), anti-c-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-GFP (Aves Labs) antibodies. After incubation with secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories) for 2 h at room temperature, samples were mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (Dako) or developed using the VectaStain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories). Images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescence microscope and a Leica SP8 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Global 5mC and 5hmC Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the global levels of 5mC and 5hmC in clinical tissues, 2 μl of DNA (200 or 400 ng/μl) from each sample was denatured and spotted onto a positively charged nylon-based membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany), which was cross-linked and blocked with 5% non-fat milk. After washing in 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS, the membrane was incubated with anti-5hmC (1:10,000, Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA) and anti-5mC (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4°C followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:5000). The signal was developed with WEST-ZOL Plus (Intron) and visualized using RAS-4000 (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Relative 5hmC intensity was calculated by dividing the positively stained areas by the total area using Multi Gauge v3.0 (Fujifilm). To estimate the relative concentration of DNA, we performed methylene blue staining (0.02% methylene blue in 0.3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of 5-hmC in MCF-7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MCF‐7 cells were grown on coverslips in 35‐mm dishes. After treatment with SFN, the cells were washed in PBS, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X‐100 in PBS for 15 min, and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The fixed cells were blocked for 30 min in blocking reagent buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and incubated with primary antibodies in blocking reagent buffer. The primary antibodies and the dilutions used for immunostaining were anti‐5hmC (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA, no. 39770) antibodies at 1 : 200. After three 5 min washes in PBS, the cells were incubated with Alexa‐488‐labeled secondary antibody (Servicebio, Wuhan, China, GB25301) diluted 1 : 300 in blocking buffer. The nuclei were stained with bisBenzimide H33342 trihydrochloride. Images were captured using a Zeiss (Jena, Germany) LSM 700B confocal microscope. The integrated optical density (IOD) of the annotated nuclei was measured in Image‐Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybermetrics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). We selected three fields to calculate the IOD value as the following formula: total optical intensity/number of cells in each field.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TSCs were grown on coverslips, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. Further details on staining procedure are provided in the Supplemental Information. Antibodies used were anti-5hmC (Active Motif, 39769) at 1:2,000 dilution, and anti-TET1 (GeneTex, GTX125888) diluted 1:750. Primary antibodies were detected with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, diluted 1:500). Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing TET1 and 5hmC in Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary skin fibroblasts stably expressing TET1 were seeded on coverslips placed in a 24-well dish (0.1 × 105 cells/well). Cells attached to the coverslip were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100, incubated in 4 N HCl, neutralized, blocked with 10% goat serum, 3% BSA, and 0.1% Triton X-100, then incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-TET1 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or anti-5hmC (1:300, Active Motif, La Hulpe, Belgium) antibodies, washed and then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies. Fluorescence was analyzed using the LSM 780/ELYRA PS.1 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Laser power and acquisition parameters were similar for each image. The “Range Indicator” option was used, which helps to set the image lighting objectively. There was no post-capture image manipulation. For each sample, 50 nuclei were quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Detection of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed, fixed, and incubated with each monoclonal antibody at 48 h after plasmid transfection as described previously 18. Dilution of primary antibodies was 1:1000 for anti‐FLAG M2 (Sigma) and 1:500 for anti‐5hmC (ActiveMotif, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Indirect detection of primary antibodies was achieved by 60 min‐incubation with 1:100 diluted secondary antibodies: FITC‐labeled goat anti‐mouse IgG (Zymed 62‐6511, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Rhodamine‐labeled goat anti‐rabbit IgG (Chemicon AP‐187R, EMD Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were stained for 10 min with 0.5 μg/mL 4', 6'‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI). Images were acquired on an Olympus BX60 fluorescence microscope fitted with a charge‐coupled device camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA) and controlled by a Macintosh computer running the Quips mFISH software (Vysis Inc., Downers Grove, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was extracted using a lysis buffer consisting of (50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 250 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mM Na3VO4) supplemented with 1× protease inhibitor cocktail solution (Roche). Extracts were quantified using Qubit protein assay (ThermoFisher) and were run on polyacrylamide gels. Gels were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes using a wet transfer method in 3-(Cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid (CAPS) buffer. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used in this study: anti-FLAG (A8592, Sigma), anti-TET1 (GTX124207, GeneTex), anti-TET1 (GT1462, Sigma), anti-5hmC (catalog # 39769, Active Motif) and anti-β-actin (A5316, Sigma). For the DNA slot blot analysis, we followed the protocol established previously with the exception of using a slot blot apparatus instead of a dot blot (19 (link)). Blots were imaged using FluorChem Q and unsaturated bands were quantified using the multiplex band analysis tool followed by normalizing to local background and β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying DNA Modifications and Histone Marks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For DNA dot blot analysis, total DNA was extracted, quantified. DNA (80 ng) was loaded on nitrocellulose membrane, air dried, and exposed in UV for 20 min. After blocking with by 5% BSA/TTBS at room temperature for 2 hours, the membrane was incubated in anti-5hmC (Active Motif) and anti-5mC (Abcam) antibodies at 4°C overnight. For protein blot, histones were acid-extracted from cell samples. 2µg of histone samples were electrophoresized with 15% SDS-PAGE gels, and the blotted membranes were incubated with anti-H3K4m3, H3K9m3, H3K27m3, H3K36m3 and H3 antibodies (all from Millipore). Positive bands were detected and captured by ChemiDocR (Bio-rad, Hercules, Ca), and intensities of the bands were quantified using Image J software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij). Quantification was performed using average values from three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying 5hmC and 5mC Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Kit (QIAGEN), denatured (0.4M sodium hydroxide, 10mM EDTA at 100°C for 10 min), and then neutralized (6.6M cold ammonium acetate, pH 7). We applied 200 ng of DNA to a prewet Amersham Hybond‐N+ membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The membrane was blocked and incubated in primary antibody overnight (anti‐5hmC and anti‐5mC 1/200; Active Motif, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), followed by the appropriate peroxidase‐labeled secondary antibody (1/5000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Blots were visualized using Luminata Forte HRP substrate (Millipore), and quantified using ImageJ software (NIH; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!