The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti prmt5

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Anti-PRMT5 is a laboratory product that detects the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5). PRMT5 is an enzyme that catalyzes the symmetric dimethylation of arginine residues in target proteins. This product can be used to identify and quantify PRMT5 in biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using anti prmt5

1

Comprehensive Lipid Metabolism Regulatory Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All general chemicals and reagents were procured from Sigma-Aldrich/ Merck Millipore, HiMedia and Promega. Tissue culture plastic ware was purchased from Jet Biofil or Tarsons India Pvt. Ltd. and Corning Inc. siRNAs were obtained from Dharmacon as siGENOME SMART-pool reagents against Yy1, Prmt5, Notch1, Itch. Oleic acid, HRP-tagged anti-β-ACTIN (A3854), 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-cleaved NOTCH1, anti-ITCH, anti-YY1, anti- α-TUBULIN, anti-PRMT5, anti-EZH2, anti-H3K27me3 antibodies were procured from Cell Signaling Technology (USA). Anti-H4R3me2s antibody was sourced from Abcam. Anti-ADRP and anti-CD36 antibodies were procured from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (USA). Anti-LAMINB1 antibody was purchased from IMGENEX. HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG/anti-mouse IgG was obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch (USA). Lipofectamine 3000 was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. BODIPY 493/503 (4,4-Difluoro-1,3,5,7,8-Pentamethyl-4-Bora-3a,4a-Diaza-s-Indacene lipid stain was from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblotting Analysis of Xenograft Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates extracted from the xenografts and cell lines were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for immunoblotting as described41 (link). Primary antibodies used in this study were anti-TGFBR2 (diluted 1:1000, clone D-2, sc-17799, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-SMAD2 (diluted 1:1000, clone D43B4, 5339, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-pSMAD2 (diluted 1:1000, clone 138D4, 3108 Cell Signaling, USA), anti-SMAD3 (diluted 1:1000, clone C67H9, 9523, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-pSMAD3 (diluted 1:1000, clone C25A9, 9520, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-Involucrin (diluted 1:1000, clone SY5, MA5-11803, Invitrogen, USA) anti-MTAP (diluted 1:1000, 4158 S, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-PRMT5 (diluted 1:1000, 2252 S, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-MAT2A(diluted 1:10000, clone B-10, Sc-166452, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-SDMA (diluted 1:1000, 13222 S, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-Caspase-3 (Asp175)(diluted 1:1000, clone 5A1E, 9664, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-BAX (diluted: 1000, 2772, Cell Signaling, USA), anti-p53 (diluted 1:1000, clone DO-1, Sc-126, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-Actin (diluted 1:100000, clone13E5, 4967, Cell Signaling, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Optimization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysate was prepared by scraping cells directly from 6-well plates in urea lysis buffer (8M urea, 1% β-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5). Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel prior to transferring onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in 5% BSA before probing with desired primary antibodies and corresponding horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies. Proteins were detected by radiography using ECL with film in dark room. Antibodies for western blotting were developed as previously described for anti-CARM1 substrates (NRIBme2a),41 (link) acquired either from Invitrogen (anti-ATR #710746), Millipore (anti-PRMT5, #07–405), or Cell Signaling (anti-ADMA, #13522, anti-SDMA, #13222, anti-ATR pS428 #2853, anti-CHK1 pS296 #2349, anti-CHK1 pS345 #2348, anti-CHK1 # 2360, anti-Actin #3700, anti-Mouse HRP #7076, anti-Rabbit HRP #7074).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ChIP Assay of PRMT5, BRG1 and H3R8

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
INS-1 cells were plated at a density of 2×106 cells/10-cm tissue culture plate, and cultured for 30 hours with each treatment condition. After collection of cells, ChIP assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a QuickChIP kit (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, USA), as previously reported (Feng, et al. 2017b (link); Matkar, et al. 2015 (link)). Briefly, cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde and then lysed according to the protocol in a ChIP lysis buffer with protease inhibitors, and cellular DNA was sheared with sonication. After clearing, this lysate was incubated with either control IgG or a specific primary antibody (4 μg) at 4°C overnight, and collected with protein A/G agarose beads. The antibodies used here include anti-PRMT5 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA, Cat # ab31751), anti-BRG1 (Abcam, Cambridge, USA, Cat # ab110641), anti-H3R8 (Abcam, Cambridge, USA, Cat # ab130740), and anti-IgG (Abcam, Cambridge, USA, Cat # ab46540). The protein-DNA complexes were eluted from the beads and DNA was amplified by qPCR using primer pairs (S-Table 1) specific to the insulin promoter. Reactions were done in duplicate, and results are normalized to input chromatin and are reported as % input +/− SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Pancreas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse whole pancreas tissue was fixed in 4% formalin and processed for paraffin embedding. Antigen retrieval was performed by microwave heating in antigen retrieval solution-citrate buffered (Abcam, Cambridge, USA). Detection was done using fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (BD, Franklin Lakes, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions as previously reported (Yang et al. 2010 (link)). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-Insulin (1:200) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA, Cat # 8138S), anti-Prmt5 (1:200) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA, Cat # ab31751), and anti-Ki67 (1:200) (Abcam, USA, Cat #ab15580). Cell nuclear staining was performed using DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA, Cat # 10236276001). The sections were visualized using a Nikon Eclipse E800 fluorescent microscope (Tokyo, Japan) with a CCD digital camera. Whole pancreas scanning was implemented using a Leica DMI6000B fluorescent microscope (Wetzlar, Germany). Quantification of insulin-positive areas and staining intensity was performed with Image J software (Wayne Rasband, NIH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!