The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using counting beads

1

Tumor Cell Killing Assay with T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lines (prelabeled with fluorescent tracer DiO) and primary cells were incubated with T cells in 3DTEBM and treated with or without Isotype/CD3, nanoBiTEs, or nanoMuTEs at a concentration of 3.7 nM for 4 days. Before digestion of the matrix, 5 μL of counting beads (Miltenyi Biotec) were added to the culture. The matrix was then digested, cells were retrieved, and analyzed by flow cytometry using MACSQuant Analyzer 10. For cell lines, the number of tumor cells analyzed as DiO+ cells and normalized to the number of counting beads using BD FlowJo Software. For primary cells, MM cells were identified as CD38+/CD3-/CD14-/CD16-/CD19-/CD123-, as previously described (50 (link)), and the number of MM primary cells was normalized to the number of counting beads using BD FlowJo Software. For the analysis of WM killing without T cells, the above procedure was mimicked except without including T cells in 3DTEBM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

3D Tumor Microenvironment Killing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lines (prelabeled with fluorescent tracer DiO) and primary cells were incubated with T cells in 3DTEBM and treated with or without isotype/CD3, nanoBiTEs, or nanoMuTEs at a concentration of 3.7 nM for 4 days. Before digestion of the matrix, 5 μl of counting beads (Miltenyi Biotec) were added to the culture. The matrix was then digested, cells were retrieved, and analyzed by flow cytometry using MACSQuant Analyzer 10. For cell lines, the number of tumor cells analyzed as DiO+ cells and normalized to the number of counting beads using BD FlowJo Software. For primary cells, MM cells were identified as CD38+/CD3−/CD14−/CD16−/CD19−/CD123−, as previously described [49 (link)], and the number of MM primary cells was normalized to the number of counting beads using BD FlowJo Software. For the analysis of WM killing without T cells, the above procedure was mimicked except without including T cells in 3DTEBM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LEC-T Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LECs were sorted by flow cytometry (Astrios sorter; Beckman Coulter) from Atg5ΔProx1 and Atg5WT stromal cell cultures and incubated (100,000 LECs/well) in 24-well plates coated as before. At cell confluence, cells were starved (in HBSS) or not starved overnight (250 µl). LEC culture medium was supplemented with 600 µl of RPMI, and transwell membrane (5-µm pores; Cornix) was added in each well. CD4+ T cells were purified from naive mice using a magnetic isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) and activated in vitro (anti-CD3 + anti-CD28 antibodies) for 3 d. Then, activated CD4+ cells were treated or not with FTY-720 (100 nM; Sigma-Aldrich) for the last 12 h, washed, and added (150,000 cells) in the upper part of the transwell. 4 h later, CD4+ T cell migration was analyzed in the bottom part by flow cytometry using counting beads (BD Bioscience). Results are expressed as ratio of CD4+ T cell migration compared with control group (unstarved Atg5WT LECs with CD4+ T cells untreated with FTY-720).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At indicated time points, injected inguinal LNs, spleen and, in some cases, non-treated axillary and brachial LNs were excised and processed by manual dissociation through a 40 µm cell strainer. Cells were collected by centrifugation (5 min, 800 g, 4°C). Spleen samples were resuspended in Ack lysing buffer (Invitrogen) to remove red blood cells, and then washed with PBS. LN cells were washed with PBS without lysis. Cells were counted using an automated cell counter (NanoEnTek) or counting beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences) and either plated for ex vivo restimulation assays or analyzed immediately by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mouse Lung Single Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse lungs were minced to single cell suspensions and filtered through 70‐μm cell strainers (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) as previously described.9, 28 The erythrocytes were lysed using red blood cell lysis buffer (BD Biosciences) and washed with phosphate‐buffered saline. Cells were labeled with monoclonal antibodies including anti‐mouse CD45‐FITC, Gr‐1‐PE, CD11b‐PerCP, CD48‐APC, and counting beads (BD Biosciences) was added. Matched isotype antibodies were used as negative controls. All samples were analyzed using a FACSCalibur cytometer (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest software, and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Analysis of Endothelial Microvesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EMVs were immunophenotypically defined as CD45−/CD42b−/CD31 + (31). Blood samples were pre-diluted 1:100 in buffered saline solution (PBS) and 50 μL of the diluted solution were used for cell-labeling reaction. Anti-human monoclonal antibodies with suitable volumes were added to the diluted sample: 5 μL of FITC CD45 (BD, clone HI30), 2 μL of CD31 Alexa Fluor 647 (BD, clone WM59) and 5 μL of CD42b PE (BD, clone HIP1). The samples containing monoclonal antibodies were incubated for 30 min protected from light at room temperature, and 2 mL of PBS was added; they were then centrifuged for 5 min at 540 g. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended with 500 μL PBS and 50 μL counting beads (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California) were added. A total of one million events were acquired using a flow cytometer (FACSCanto II) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California) and analyzed using by Infinicyt version 1.7 (Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain). A blinded investigator processed all samples. The amount of EMVs was determined from the number and volume of counting beads. Microvesicle sizes were compared to platelet sizes using average fluorescence intensity of forward scatter, showing a mean diameter ≤ 1.0 μm. Figure S5 (supplementary material) describes the gating strategy for CD45−/CD42b−/CD31 + EMVs. EMV was assessed 10 min before and 10 and 70 min post-intervention.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Nes-GFP+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T cells were stained for CD3-PB (Pacific Blue) and sorted with an Influx apparatus (BD), while flow cytometric analyses were performed with Influx or Gallios (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) flow cytometers. Data were analyzed with FlowJo 10.6.2 software (Treestar, Woodburn, OR, USA). Additionally, we used counting beads (BD Biosciences, 340334, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to determine the % of Nes-GFP+ cells. The primary and secondary antibodies are listed in the Supplementary Information, Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DC Adoptive Transfer and Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After coculture, DCs were purified by CD4+ T cell depletion with a CD90.2-positive selection depletion kit (StemCell). Between 5 and 1 × 106 cells, in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS were injected in the footpad of C57B/L6 wild-type mice (CD45.2). To reduce animal variability, nonsynaptic or postsynaptic DCs were injected in different limbs of the same mice. After 24 hours, popliteal, inguinal, and axillary lymph nodes were removed and processed with Liberase and deoxyribonuclease. Cells were then stained using CD45.1, CD11c, CD3, and Ghost Red 780 Viability Dye antibodies and analyzed in a BD FACS Canto II cytometer. Total number of cells was normalized using Counting Beads (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Chemotactic Migration of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Postsynaptic DCs were purified after 48 hours of IS formation and resuspended in RPMI medium with 0.1% BSA. Cells were settled in 100 μl in a Transwell permeable support (5-μm pore size, polycarbonate membrane, Costar) over 600 μl of RPMI medium with 0.1% BSA alone (basal) or containing mouse CCL19 (100 ng/ml). A well was filled with the same amount of cells without the membrane as input. Cells were let to migrate for 3 hours at 37°C. Afterward, membrane was removed and migrated cells were recovered. Then, cells were stained with a viability dye (7AAD) and CD11c+ antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. The number of migrated cells was counted and normalized using Counting Beads (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Murine liver immune cell profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were isolated from freshly harvested murine livers by mechanical and enzymatic digestion as previously described [6 (link)]. For flow cytometry analysis, cell suspensions were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for CD45, Ly6G, CD103, Ly6C, B220, NK1.1, Counting beads (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany), CD11b, F4/80, CD11c, MHCII, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD62L, FoxP3, viability dye (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), α-GalCer (NIH) and analyzed using a LSR Fortessa flow cytometer system (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany). NKT cells were gated as singlets, viable, CD45+, CD3+ and NK1.1+ signals. For detailed gating strategy of all immune subsets see Supplementary Table S2. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!