The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vacuum oven

Manufactured by Avantor
Sourced in United States

The Vacuum Oven is a laboratory equipment designed to create a controlled environment with reduced atmospheric pressure. Its core function is to facilitate the drying, degassing, or heat treatment of materials in a vacuum-sealed chamber. The vacuum oven maintains a stable and consistent environment for various applications in scientific research and industrial processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using vacuum oven

1

Corn Zein Nanofiber Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanofibers were fabricated by dissolving 5.3 g of corn zein into 10 mL of formic acid at room temperature with mixing using a benchtop vortexer (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA). Prior to dissolving corn zein, sodium citrate was dissolved into formic acid at concentrations of 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30% (weight drug/weight zein) for samples containing the drug. The dissolved zein-sodium citrate solution was transferred to a disposable syringe (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA) and attached to a Neo Siphon-Feed Dual-Action Airbrush from Anest Iwata-Medea, Inc. (Portland, OR, USA), via a plastic attachment made in-house from a piece of tubing. A DeWalt D55168 air compressor (Baltimore, MD, USA) was used to supply the airbrush with 100 psi of pressure, which provided shear to produce the fibers. The solution was sprayed into an aluminum foiled lined box approximately 1.5 m away and dried overnight in a vacuum oven (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA) at 60 °C to evaporate the excess formic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Substrate Preparation for Surface Coating

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The substrates (glass slides or Si-wafer) were cut into square pieces and then were immersed in a freshly prepared piranha solution for 1 h at 100 °C. The substrates were then rinsed thoroughly with deionized water and dried using an air stream. The substrates then were further oxidized in a UV/Ozone cleaner (model 42, Jelight) for 8 min. The cleaned and oxidized substrates were then coated with a 5 wt.% solution of 75:25 or 55:45 (by mass) PSS:PEG in DI water using a spin coater (p-6000 Spin Coater, Specialty Coating System Inc., Indianapolis, IN) at 2000 rpm for 30 s. Coated substrates were then placed in a vacuum oven (<100 mTorr) (VWR International, Radnor, PA) for 1 hour at 40 °C then the temperature was increased to 130 °C for 12 hours. After curing, the films were thoroughly rinsed with DI water to remove excess material prior to carrying the attachment experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Purification of Mono-Tosylated PEG5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Penta(ethylene glycol) (EG5) (2.00 g, 8.39 mmol) was added to a round bottom flask (RBF) equipped with a magnetic stirrer with freshly distilled DCM. Re-crystallized p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (1.76 g, 9.23 mmol) and triethyl amine (1.74 mL, 12.6 mmol) were added to the RBF and left to stir overnight. The next day, the reaction mixture was washed three times with a saturated solution of aqueous sodium chloride. The organic layer was extracted and dried with sodium sulfate. Silica gel chromatography was used to purify the singly tosylated EG5 (Tos1-EG5OH) from the doubly tosylated EG5 and unmodified EG5 using ethyl acetate as the eluent. The Tos1-EG5OH fraction was dried in vacuo (vacuum oven from VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) and its chemical composition was verified using 1H NMR (Figure S1 in SI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Reactive Oxygen Species in Kernels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent histochemical staining with confocal microscopy was used to quantify two select ROS. An Amplex Red Hydrogen Peroxide/Peroxidase Assay Kit (A22188, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used to detect hydrogen peroxide (Mohanty et al., 1997), and aminophenyl fluorescein (A36003, Molecular Probe. Inc., Eugene, OR) was used to detect hydroxyl radical (Setsukinai et al., 2003), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the collected kernels were immersed in above‐mentioned fluorescent dyes and infiltrated in the dark using a vacuum oven (VWR Scientific, Neobits, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) for 2 h and kept in vacuum overnight. Afterwards, the kernels were rinsed in 50 μm PBS buffer twice, and fluorescence was then detected using an Olympus BX41 spectrofluorometer (Olympus, Waltham, MA) coupled with a camera as previously described by Yang et al. (2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis of Graphene Oxide Aerogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sulfuric acid, potassium permanganate, hydrogen peroxide, and 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Tin chloride pentahydrate (SnCl4∙5H2O), nickel chloride hexahydrate (NiCl2∙6H2O), palladium chloride (PdCl2), and chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Graphite powders (microfyne grade) were purchased from Dixon Inc. All chemicals were used as received without further purification.
A Labconco freeze drying chamber (FreeZone 1) was used for the lyophilization of the graphene oxide hydrogels. The Labcono lyophilizer was operated at a temperature of −52 °C under a pressure of 0.02 mbar. VWR vacuum oven was used for the vacuum drying of GO powders. BRANSON digital horn sonifier was used to disperse GO in water. A Thermo Scientific tube furnace (Lindberg Blue M) was used for the hydrogen reduction of the freeze-dried graphene oxide aerogels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Purification of Mono-Tosylated PEG5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Penta(ethylene glycol) (EG5) (2.00 g, 8.39 mmol) was added to a round bottom flask (RBF) equipped with a magnetic stirrer with freshly distilled DCM. Re-crystallized p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (1.76 g, 9.23 mmol) and triethyl amine (1.74 mL, 12.6 mmol) were added to the RBF and left to stir overnight. The next day, the reaction mixture was washed three times with a saturated solution of aqueous sodium chloride. The organic layer was extracted and dried with sodium sulfate. Silica gel chromatography was used to purify the singly tosylated EG5 (Tos1-EG5OH) from the doubly tosylated EG5 and unmodified EG5 using ethyl acetate as the eluent. The Tos1-EG5OH fraction was dried in vacuo (vacuum oven from VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) and its chemical composition was verified using 1H NMR (Figure S1 in SI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparation of Lipid Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipid vesicles were prepared according to the protocols published by Jiang et al. (55 (link)). Briefly, lipids were stored in chloroform/methanol (2:1) stock solutions at −20 °C. Lipid films were prepared by drying the appropriate amounts of stock solutions under a stream of dry nitrogen followed by vacuum desiccation (vacuum oven; VWR) at room temperature for ∼2 h to remove traces of organic solvents. The resultant lipid films were hydrated using appropriate volumes of buffer containing 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM TCEP and subjected to vortex mixing (approximately three times, 60 s each). The multilamellar vesicle solutions were extruded through a 100 nm diameter polycarbonate membrane (Whatman, GE Healthcare) using an extrusion kit (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc) and used immediately for NMR and size measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Colon Tissue Fixation and Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The colon was carefully dissected and the colonic tissue 1 cm distal to the cecum was fixed in pre-chilled Carnoy’s solution containing 60% ethanol, 30% acetic acid, and 10% chloroform for 2 ~ 4 h on ice. The tissue was then rinsed under running distilled water to remove excess Carnoy’s solution, placed in 70% FLEX (Richard-Allan Scientific, San Diego CA, USA) and stored at 4°C until ready to process. Before processing, the colon tissue was placed in a cassette. The cassette was then put in a beaker containing 80% FLEX and incubated at room temperature for 30–60 min. The tissue was processed in a STP 120 tissue processor (ThermoFisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with a program set up as follows: 80% FLEX for 30 min once, 100% FLEX for 30 min twice, clear rite for 30 min twice, and paraffin type 9 wax (Richard-Allan Scientific) for 20 min twice. Cassettes were removed from the processor and put into a beaker containing paraffin type 9 wax. Wax was degassed for 10 min in a vacuum oven (VWR Scientific Inc., Bridgeport, NJ, USA) with the vacuum pressure set at 17.5 inHg and temperature at 60°C. The degas procedure was repeated once followed by embedding using a HistoStar embedding equipment (ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fabrication of Customizable PDMS Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PDMS resin and crosslinker (Dow Sylgard 184) were mixed at a weight ratio of 10:1. PDMS was degassed under vacuum (VWR vacuum oven) at room temperature for 30 min. 25 g of the PDMS was poured into a 100 mm petri dish (VWR) and cured at 60 °C for 24 h. PDMS strips were cut to either 34.8 mm long by 6 mm wide (unbent) or 36.3 mm long by 6 mm wide (bent) to fit into a standard 6 well plate (VWR). Elastomer surface abrasion was done by wiping 50X full 360° rotations with a Kim-wipe tissue in direction parallel to the axis of bending. The patterned surface cracks were generated by ‘press embossing’ (EVG 520 semi-automated Hot Embosser) a saw-tooth topography (30 µm pitch) against newly cast PDMS. All PDMS samples were cleaned by rinsing in DI water and ethanol sequentially, 5X.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dehydration of Demineralized Dentin Beams

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens of completely demineralized dentin beams were dehydrated using the method reported by Cameron et al. [10 (link)]. Briefly, the demineralized specimens were placed in a vacuum oven (VWR Scientific, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA) and subjected to −762 torr of vacuum (25 °C) created by a vacuum pump until their water content fell to 0.10 g H2O/g dry mass. The temperature of the oven was then raised 10 °C/hr beginning at 25 °C until it reached 90 °C. The loss of dry mass was followed gravimetrically for 7 days using a Mettler/Toledo AG ultramicrobalance (Model XPS, Greifensee, Switzerland) capable of measuring to the nearest 0.01 mg. Thermal denaturation of the dentin matrix may be prevented if such matrices are partially dried [30 (link)]. Previously published differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies indicate that the denaturation temperature (Td) of dentin matrix is 65.5 °C in water-saturated matrices, but 176.1 °C in relatively dry dentin matrices [30 (link)]. When the specimens fell to a water content of 0.001 g H2O/g dry mass, they were regarded as being absolutely dry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!